Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Ex-Gratia Response to Disasters by the Indian Government


Affiliations
1 Jamsetji Tata School of Disaster Studies, TISS, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


From time immemorial, the impact of a disaster is associated with the monetary loss faced by the community or an individual. In most cases, it is recovered either from the government or the perpetrator of the disaster. In many countries, money is allotted for disaster response intervention in the Government. In India, the Central and State Governments have been pro-active in awarding compensation which is mostly ex-gratia. In most man-made disasters, reliance is placed on the Courts to determine the quantum of damages. The decision of granting compensation and monetary assistance is swayed by the ad-hoc nature of the State machinery supplemented by a wide range of parameters determined by Courts on a case by case basis. The paper throws light on the impact of this uncertainty of post-disaster response and compensation on the lives of the victims. To address this, it presents case studies of the victims of the Puttingal Temple Fire in the Kollam district in Kerala in 2016. The case studies are employed to identify the challenges faced by affected individuals and families faced while dealing with monetary assistance extended after the incident by the State and Central governments. They cover monetary and medical assistance to the victims. The input is expected to emphasize the need for moving away from an ad-hoc approach to a more right-based approach. The study throws light on vulnerabilities of the victims to identify better measures of creating a right-based approach to support the affected people.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Zack, N. (2006), Philosophy and disaster.
  • Sugarman, S.D. (2007), Roles of government in compensating disaster victims. Issues in Legal Scholarship, 6(3).
  • Das, S., and N.K. Jha (2004), Natural Disasters and Relief Provisions in India: Commitments and Ground Realities. Centre for Budget and Governance Accountability.
  • Sabha, L. and U.Q. No (2005), Government of India Ministry of Home Affairs, SSB, 1: 76-065.
  • Government of India (2015), Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund, Retrieved from http://www.pmindia.gov.in/en/pms-funds/#skip_to_main
  • Government of India (2014), Prime Minister’s National Relief Fund. Retrieved from https://archivepmo.nic.in/drmanmohansingh/relief.php?nodeid=217
  • Prime Minister's National Relief Fund vs. Jasmeet Singh and Others, LPA 231/2016 (High Court of Delhi 2018).
  • Dr. T.P. Senkumar IPS vs. Union of India and Others, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction Civil Appeal No. 5227 of 2017 (Supreme Court 2017).
  • Senkumar, T.P. (2016), Kollam Fire, Chief Minister Disaster Relief Fund, Retrieved from http://epaper.newindianexpress.com/781747/The-New-Indian-Express-Kochi/1804201
  • Ministry of Commerce and Industry Petroleum and Explosives Safety Organisation. (2017). Annual Report 2016-17. Retrieved from http://peso.gov.in/PDF/AR_2016_17.pdf
  • Additional Chief Secretary Kerala (2016), Memorandum submitted by the Additional Chief Secretary (Revenue & Disaster Management) and State Relief Commissioner for the Puttingal Temple Fire.
  • Gobald Motor Service Ltd. and Another vs. R. M. K. Veluswami and Others, 1962 SCR (1)929.
  • Municipal Corporation of Delhi, Delhi vs. Association of Victims of Uphaar Tragedy and Others, (2011) 14 SCC 481.
  • Lata Wadhwa vs. State of Bihar (2001), 8 SCC 197.
  • General Manager, Kerala S.R.T.C vs. Susamma Thomas, 1994 AIR 1631.

Abstract Views: 402

PDF Views: 0




  • Ex-Gratia Response to Disasters by the Indian Government

Abstract Views: 402  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Saumya Kumar
Jamsetji Tata School of Disaster Studies, TISS, Mumbai 400088, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


From time immemorial, the impact of a disaster is associated with the monetary loss faced by the community or an individual. In most cases, it is recovered either from the government or the perpetrator of the disaster. In many countries, money is allotted for disaster response intervention in the Government. In India, the Central and State Governments have been pro-active in awarding compensation which is mostly ex-gratia. In most man-made disasters, reliance is placed on the Courts to determine the quantum of damages. The decision of granting compensation and monetary assistance is swayed by the ad-hoc nature of the State machinery supplemented by a wide range of parameters determined by Courts on a case by case basis. The paper throws light on the impact of this uncertainty of post-disaster response and compensation on the lives of the victims. To address this, it presents case studies of the victims of the Puttingal Temple Fire in the Kollam district in Kerala in 2016. The case studies are employed to identify the challenges faced by affected individuals and families faced while dealing with monetary assistance extended after the incident by the State and Central governments. They cover monetary and medical assistance to the victims. The input is expected to emphasize the need for moving away from an ad-hoc approach to a more right-based approach. The study throws light on vulnerabilities of the victims to identify better measures of creating a right-based approach to support the affected people.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F2019%2Fv61%2Fi4%2F191462