Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Alternative Social Welfare Function Based on Theil's Entropy Measure


     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Chakravarty (1982) derived a Social Welfare Function based on a set of axioms conforming to widely shared views on measurement of welfare. The Social Welfare Function turned out to be a decreasing function of normatised Theil's Entropy Measure and an increasing function of the mean income. Theil's measure T as such, has a number of desirable properties and conforms to the Principle of Population Replication. The normalised measure (T/log n), however, fails to do so. By altering one of the assumptions in his set up an alternative Social Welfare Function has been derived. This Social Welfare Function is a negative transformation of Theil's measure as such, not normalised, and has some Interesting properties and Interpretations different from those of Chakravarty (1982).
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

Abstract Views: 366

PDF Views: 0




  • An Alternative Social Welfare Function Based on Theil's Entropy Measure

Abstract Views: 366  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Abstract


Chakravarty (1982) derived a Social Welfare Function based on a set of axioms conforming to widely shared views on measurement of welfare. The Social Welfare Function turned out to be a decreasing function of normatised Theil's Entropy Measure and an increasing function of the mean income. Theil's measure T as such, has a number of desirable properties and conforms to the Principle of Population Replication. The normalised measure (T/log n), however, fails to do so. By altering one of the assumptions in his set up an alternative Social Welfare Function has been derived. This Social Welfare Function is a negative transformation of Theil's measure as such, not normalised, and has some Interesting properties and Interpretations different from those of Chakravarty (1982).


DOI: https://doi.org/10.21648/arthavij%2F1995%2Fv37%2Fi3%2F115975