Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Rani, Pinki
- Comparison of Rural and Urban Children According to Home Environment and Parenting Style
Abstract Views :359 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, I.C. Collage of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, I.C. Collage of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
Source
Asian Journal of Home Science, Vol 8, No 2 (2013), Pagination: 665-667Abstract
The present study was carried out in Hisar district of Haryana state. The sample consisted of 100 girls between the age group of 7-8 years and their parents (both mother and father). Hence, the total sample for the study was 300 (100 girls and 200 parents). Parenting Style and Dimensions Questionnaire (Robinson et al., 1995), Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (Bradley and Caldwell, 1984) and Vineland Adaptive Behaviour scale developed (Sparrow et al., 1984) were used to assess the parenting style, home environment and behaviour of the children, respectively. Results revealed significant differences for all aspects of home environment, namely responsivity (Z= 2.90∗) encouragement of maturity (Z=3.47∗), emotional climate (Z= 3.66∗), learning material and opportunities (Z= 5.50∗), enrichment (Z=6.51∗), family companionship (Z=6.38∗), family integration (Z=3.22∗) and physical environment (Z=5.26∗) and significant differences between parenting style, namely authoritative, authoritarian and permissive in both mother and father parenting. Result further revealed that significant differences were found between respondents of rural and urban areas in aspects of adaptive behaviour namely, communication domain, daily living skill domain and motor skill domain. It was observed that urban respondents performed better than rural respondents in all aspects of adaptive behaviour.Keywords
Parenting Style,home Environment, Socialization, Family Integration- Comparison of Rural and Urban Children According to Adaptive Behaviour and Home Environment
Abstract Views :282 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, I.C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, I.C. College of Home Science, Chaudhary Charan Singh Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), IN
Source
Asian Journal of Home Science, Vol 11, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 124-126Abstract
The present study was carried out in Hisar district of Haryana state. The sample consisted 100 girls between the age group of 7-8 years and their parents (both mother and father). Hence, the total sample for the study was 300 (100 girls and 200 parents) from both location. Home Observation for Measurement of the Environment (Bradley and Caldwell, 1984) and Vineland Adaptive Behaviour scale (Sparrow et al., 1984) were used to assess home environment and behaviour of the children, respectively. Results revealed areawise significant differences for all aspects of home environment namely, Responsivity (Z= 2.90*) Encouragement of maturity (Z=3.47*), Emotional climate (Z= 3.66*), Learning material and opportunities (Z= 5.50*), Enrichment (Z=6.51*), Family companionship (Z=6.38*), Family integration (Z=3.22*), and Physical environment (Z=5.26*). Results further revealed that significant differences between respondents of rural and urban areas in aspects of adaptive behaviour namely, Communication domain, Daily living skill domain and Motor skill domain. It was observed that urban respondents performed better than rural respondents in all aspects of adaptive behaviour.Keywords
Adaptive Behaviour, Home Environment, Emotional Climate, Family Companionship.References
- Bornstein, R.F. (2005). Direct and indirect effect of parenting style on children. Professional Psychology Res. & Practice, 36 (1) : 82-89.
- Bradley, R.H. and Caldwell, B.M. (1984). The home inventory: A validation of preschool scale for black children. Child Development, 52 : 708-710.
- Carneiro, P. and Heckman, J. J. (2003). Human capital policy. In: J. J. Heckman and A. Krueger (eds.) Inequality in America: What role for human capital policy? MIT Press on Social Attribute Checklist. J. Law & Econ., 48 (1) :1-39.
- Kotchick, B.A. and Forehand, R. (2002). Putting parenting in perspective: A discussion of the contextual factors that shape parenting practices. J. Child & Family Studies, 11 : 255-269.
- Sparrow, S.S., Balla, D.A. and Cicchetti, D.V. (1984). Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales: Expanded form manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
- Susan, S. (1995). Folger Collective on Early Modern Women. Women Critics 1660-1820: An Anthology. Bloomington, Indiana: Indiana University Press.
- Yeats, K.O., Macphee, D., Campbell, F.A. and Ramey, T. (1983). Maternal I.Q. and home environment as determinants of early childhood intellectual competence: A developmental analysis. Developmental Psychol., 19 : 731-739.
- Roger, S. (2005). What is behaviour ? http:// www.psychologyandspirit.com/privacy. html.
- The Role of Socio-Economic Variable Enhancing Self-Esteem Among Adolescence
Abstract Views :174 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Sunita
1,
Pinki Rani
1
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, College of Home Science, C.C.S. Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar (Haryana), IN
Source
Asian Journal of Home Science, Vol 13, No 1 (2018), Pagination: 104-107Abstract
Self-esteem as the experience of capable of meeting life challenge and being worthy of happiness. In today’s world self-esteem has been viewed as an important tool to face the competitive life. The study was conducted in Hisar district of Haryana state. All the adolescents studying in 9th and 10th standard falling in the age group 15 – 16 years were included in the sample for the study. Self-esteem was taken as dependent variable. Self-Esteem was assessed by Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (RSES) by Rosenberg’s (1989). Independent variable was socio-economic variables which included adolescent gender, caste, family type, family size, parental occupation and family income. Result revealed that non-significant differences were obtained in self – esteem mean scores when compared against family structure and annual income. This reflects that family structure and annual income make no significant differences in the scores of self – esteem of adolescents. Non-significant differences were established for selfesteem as per family size, caste, number of siblings and annual income. However comparison of mean scores revealed that adolescents of large families had slightly better self-esteem than adolescents living in medium and small families.Keywords
Adolescents, Self–Esteem, Gender, Academic Achievement, Parental Relationship, Family.References
- Allen, J.P. and Hauser, S.T. (1996). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of young adults’ states of mind regarding attachment. Development & Psychopathol., 8 : 793-809.
- Baron, R.A. and Byrne, D. (1991). Social psychology: understanding human interactions. (6th Ed.).Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
- Baumeister, R.F. (1993). Understanding the inner nature of self-esteem. In R.F. Baumeister (Ed.), Self-esteem: The puzzle of low self regard. pp. 201-218. New York: Plenum.
- Bowlby, J. (1982). Attachment and Loss, Vol. 1. Pengiune, New York.
- Brookover, W.E. (1985). Self concept of ability and school achievement. East Lansing, Michigan: Office of Research and Public Information, Michigan State University.
- Dhal, A., Bhatia, S., Sharma, V. and Gupta, P. (2007). Adolescent self –esteem, attachment and loneliness. J. Adolesc. Ment. Health, 3(3) : 61-63.
- DuBois, D.L., Burk-Braxton, C., Swenson, L. P., Tevendale, H. D. and Hardesty, J.L. (2002). Race and gender influences on adjustment in early adolescence: Investigation of an integrative model. Child Development, 73:1573– 1592.
- Galambos, N.L., Barker, E.T. and Krahn, H.J. (2006). Depression, self-esteem, and anger in emerging adulthood: Seven-year trajectories. Developmental Psychol., 42: 350–365.
- Laible, D.J., Carlo, G. and Roesch, S.C. (2004). Pathways to self-esteem in late adolescence: The role of parent and peer attachment, empathy and social behaviors. J. Adolescence, 27 : 703-716.
- Manning, M.A., Bear, C.G. and Minke, K.M. (2006). Self-concept and self-esteem. In G.G. Bear and K.M. Minke (Eds.). Children need III: Development, prevention and intervention pp.341 356.Washington, DC: National association of school psychologist.
- Parish, T.S. and Wiggle, S.E. (1985). A longitudinal study of the impact of parental divorce on adolescent’s evaluation of self and parents. Adolescence, 77: 239-244.
- Reasoner, R.(2005). The true meaning of selfesteem. Retrieved November 4 th from international council for self-esteem.
- Rosenberg, M. (1986). Self-concept to middle childhood to adolescence. In J. S. uls (Eds), Psychological perspectives on the self, pp. 107-136. Hillsdale, NJ; Erlbaum.
- Rosenberg, M. (1989). Society and the adolescent self-image (Rev.ed.). Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press.
- Rosenberg, M., Carmi, S. and Carrie, S. (1995). Globel selfe-steem and specific self-esteem. American Sociological Review, 141-156.
- Steinberg, L. (2001). We know some things: Parent- adolescent relationships in retrospect and prospect. J. Res. Adolescence, 11(1): 1-19.
- Uba, I., Yaacob, S.N., Juhari, R. and Talib, M.A. (2010). Effect of self-esteem on the relationship between depression and bullying among teenagers in Malaysia. Canadian Center of Sci. & Edu., 6(12):77-85.