Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical Research and Health Care

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Faculty Members versus Teaching Assistants as Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Facilitators: Medical Students’ Perception


Affiliations
1 Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt
2 Medical Intern, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
3 Fourth Year Medical Student, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
4 Medical Education Unit, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain
 

Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that depends on the principle of using real life problems as a trigger for the acquisition and integration of new knowledge through the problem-solving skills and experiences. The PBL allows medical students to develop important skills and attributes. Among the pillars of successful PBL implementation is the ‘class tutor’. The PBL tutor is known as the guide or mentor for the students. Tutors prompt students with metacognitive questions and provide direction without directly telling the student what to look for and where to go for information. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of faculty members and teaching assistants in facilitating PBL sessions from the students' points of view. A comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted on ISNC medical students who attended PBL sessions with both faculty members and teaching assistants in various integrated modules. A questionnaire designed by the researchers and transformed into an online survey (through Google Forms) has been used for data collection. The descriptive statistics have been used and a p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. A total of 348 medical students responded to the questionnaire. The data collection tool was based on a questionnaire that was analyzed for its validity and reliability and showed a high validity reflected by KMO and Barlett‘s test of Sphericity with a value of 0.908 (p < 0.000) and high reliability reflected by Cronbach‘s alpha with a value of 0.928. The study participants reported that 63.5% and 79.6% of faculty members and teaching assistants, respectively, had sufficient to high performance, while 36.5% and 20.4% of faculty members and teaching assistants, respectively, had a poor or insufficient performance. No association was found between students’ perception of the facilitation performance of faculty members &teaching assistants and their demographic data. The perception of the medical students of the PBL facilitation skills of teaching assistants was more positive than the skills of faculty members. Teaching assistants are suitable PBL facilitators probably because they have a better understanding of students’ needs than faculty members, being closer to them in age or their recent experience as undergraduate medical students.

Keywords

Faculty Members, Medical Students, Teaching Assistants, PBL
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Taylor D, Miflin B. Problem-based learning: Where are we now? Medical Teacher. 2008; 30(8):742–763. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421590802217199. PMid:18946818.

  • Colliver J. Effectiveness of problem-based learning curricula: Research and theory. Academic Medicine. 2000; 75:259–266. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888200003000-00017. PMid:10724315.

  • Strobel J, van Barneveld A. When is PBL more effective? A meta-synthesis of meta-analyses comparing PBL to conventional classrooms. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 2009; 3(1):44–58. https:// doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1046.

  • Amin Z, Hoon E. Basics in medical education. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions.

  • ; 8:8. https://doi.org/10.3352/jeehp.2011.8.8. PMCid:PMC3152971.

  • Ding X, Zhao L, Chu H, Tong N, Ni C, Hu Z, et al. Assessing the effectiveness of problem-based learning of preventive medicine education in China. Scientific Reports. 2015; 4:5126. https://doi.org/10.1038/ srep05126. PMid:24874915 PMCid:PMC4038805.

  • Chan LC. The role of a PBL tutor: a personal perspective. The Kaohsiung Journal of Medical Sciences. 2008; 24(3):S34–S38. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1607551X(08)70092-5.

  • Baroffio A, Nendaz M, Perrier, Nu V. Tutor training, evaluation criteria and teaching environment influence students' ratings of tutor feedback in problem-based learning. Advances in Health Sciences Education Theory Practice. 2007; 12(4):427–439. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s10459-006-9008-4. PMid:16847731.

  • Leary H, Walker A, Shelton B, Fitt M. Exploring the relationships between tutor background, tutor training, and student learning: A problem-based learning meta-analysis. The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning. 2013; 7(1):40–66. https://doi.org/10.7771/1541-5015.1331.

  • Johnson SM, Finucane PM. The emergence of problembased learning in medical education. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2001; 6(3):281–291. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00267.x. PMid:11083039.

  • Grave WS, Moust JHC, Hommes JA. The role of the tutor in a problem based learning curriculum. Maastricht University, Department of Educational Development and Research. 2003; 10–12.

  • Khan KN, Saeed SA, Frossard P. Recent medical graduates as facilitators in a PBL curriculum. Medical Education. 2006; 40:1128–1128. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.13652929.2006.02575.x. PMid:17054627.

  • Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics, Norwalk: Appleton and Lange Publications. 1994. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780101016.

  • IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. [Internet]. Available from: https://www.ibm.com/ support/pages/how-cite-ibm-spss-statistics-or-earlierversionsspss.

  • World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects [Internet]. 2008. Available from: https://www.wma.net/policies-post/wma-declarationofhelsinki-ethical-principles-for-medical-researchinvolvinghuman-subjects/.

  • Al Haqwi AI, Mohamed TA, Al Kabba AF, Alotaibi SS, Al Shehri AM, Abdulghani HM, Badri M. Problem-based learning in undergraduate medical education in Saudi Arabia: Time has come to reflect on the experience. Medical Teacher. 2015; 37(1):S61–66. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2015.1006608. PMid:25803592.

  • Al-Damegh SA, Baig LA. Comparison of an integrated problem-based learning curriculum with the traditional discipline-based curriculum in KSA. Journal of College of Physicians and Surgeons Pakistan. 2005; 15(10):605– 608. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19810296/.

  • Shamsan B, Sayed AT. Evaluation of problem-based learning course at College of Medicine, Qassim University, Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Health Sciences. 2009; 3(2):249–258. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068813/.

  • Musal B, Gursel Y, Ozan S, Taskiran HC, Van Berkel H. The satisfaction levels of students on academic support and facilities, educational activities, and tutor performance in a PBL Program. International Association of Medical Science Educators. 2006; 16(1):35–42.

  • Al-Drees AA, Khalil MS, Irshad M, Abdulghani HM. Students' perception towards the problem-based learning tutorial session in a system-based hybrid curriculum. Saudi Medical Journal. 2015; 36(3):341–348. https:// doi.org/10.15537/smj.2015.3.10216. PMid:25737178 PMCid:PMC4381020.

  • Saeed SA, Zia N, Qazi Y. Facilitation skills of basic sciences faculty and fresh medical graduates: An AKU experience. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2010; 2(2):1316–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2010.03.193.

  • Steele DJ, Medder JD, Turner P: A comparison of learning outcomes and attitudes in student- versus faculty-led problem- based learning: an experimental study. Medical Education. 2000; 34(1):23–29. https://doi.org/10.1046/ j.1365-2923.2000.00460.x. PMid:10607275.

  • Wilkerson L, Hailer JP, Liu P. A case study of studentdirected discussion in four problem-based tutorial groups. Academic Medicine. 1991; 66(9):S79–S81. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199109000-00048. PMid:1930538.

  • Neville AJ. The problem-based learning tutor: Teacher? Facilitator? Evaluator? Medical Teacher. 1999; 21(4):393– 401. https://doi.org/10.1080/01421599979338.

  • Groves M, Régo P, O'Rourke P. Tutoring in problembased learning medical curricula: The influence of tutor background and style on effectiveness. BMC Medical Education. 2005; 5(1):1–7. https://doi.org/10.1186/14726920-5-20. PMid:15938758 PMCid:PMC1180438.

  • Nagraj S, Miles S, Bryant P, Holland R. Medical students' views about having different types of problem-based learning tutors. Medical Science Educator. 2019; 29(1):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-01800634-9.

  • Silver M, Wilkerson L. Effects of tutors with subject expertise on the problem- based tutorial process. Academic Medicine. 1991; 66(5):298–300. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-199105000-00017. PMid:2025366.

  • Chung EK, Hitchcock MA, Oh SA, Han ER, Woo YJ. The relationship between student perceptions of tutor performance and tutors' background in problem-based learning in South Korea. International Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 2:7–11. https://doi.org/10.5116/ ijme.4d38.d07e.

  • Maudsley G. Roles and responsibilities of the problembased learning tutor in the undergraduate medical

  • curriculum. BMJ. 1999; 318(7184): 657–661. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.318.7184.657. PMid:10066213 PMCid:PMC1115096.

  • Aldayel AA, Alali AO, Altuwaim AA, Alhussain HA, Aljasser KA, Abdulrahman KA, et al. Problem-based learning: medical students' perception toward their educational environment at Al-Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University. Advances in Medical Education and Practice. 2019; 10:95–104. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S189062.PMid:30881170 PMCid:PMC6396659


Abstract Views: 83

PDF Views: 57




  • Faculty Members versus Teaching Assistants as Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Facilitators: Medical Students’ Perception

Abstract Views: 83  |  PDF Views: 57

Authors

Asmaa Abdel Nasser
Medical Education Department, Faculty of Medicine, Suez Canal University, Egypt
Jawaher Mansour Al Sharfa
Medical Intern, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Mariam Ali AL-Garni
Medical Intern, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Fatima Aqeel Alzubaidi
Medical Intern, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Ashjan Salem Bahwirith
Medical Intern, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Mariam Aqeel Alzubaidi
Fourth Year Medical Student, Ibn Sina National College for Medical Studies, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia
Hani Atwa
Medical Education Unit, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain

Abstract


Problem-Based Learning (PBL) is a student-centered pedagogy that depends on the principle of using real life problems as a trigger for the acquisition and integration of new knowledge through the problem-solving skills and experiences. The PBL allows medical students to develop important skills and attributes. Among the pillars of successful PBL implementation is the ‘class tutor’. The PBL tutor is known as the guide or mentor for the students. Tutors prompt students with metacognitive questions and provide direction without directly telling the student what to look for and where to go for information. The aim of the study was to compare the performance of faculty members and teaching assistants in facilitating PBL sessions from the students' points of view. A comparative, cross-sectional study was conducted on ISNC medical students who attended PBL sessions with both faculty members and teaching assistants in various integrated modules. A questionnaire designed by the researchers and transformed into an online survey (through Google Forms) has been used for data collection. The descriptive statistics have been used and a p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. A total of 348 medical students responded to the questionnaire. The data collection tool was based on a questionnaire that was analyzed for its validity and reliability and showed a high validity reflected by KMO and Barlett‘s test of Sphericity with a value of 0.908 (p < 0.000) and high reliability reflected by Cronbach‘s alpha with a value of 0.928. The study participants reported that 63.5% and 79.6% of faculty members and teaching assistants, respectively, had sufficient to high performance, while 36.5% and 20.4% of faculty members and teaching assistants, respectively, had a poor or insufficient performance. No association was found between students’ perception of the facilitation performance of faculty members &teaching assistants and their demographic data. The perception of the medical students of the PBL facilitation skills of teaching assistants was more positive than the skills of faculty members. Teaching assistants are suitable PBL facilitators probably because they have a better understanding of students’ needs than faculty members, being closer to them in age or their recent experience as undergraduate medical students.

Keywords


Faculty Members, Medical Students, Teaching Assistants, PBL

References