Social Work Chronicle

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Caregiver-Child Relationship in Residential Homes for Children


Affiliations
1 TISS, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Residential homes in India provide an alternative to family-based care for an important number of children in need of care and protection. Children’s relationship within residential homes, especially with their caregivers, has a crucial role to play in their physical and psychological recovery from any traumatic experiences in their past, and in facilitating their cognitive, physical and psycho-social development in general. In view of the relevance of interactions between caregivers and child residents, this study attempted to understand the existing status of caregiver-child relationship in residential homes for children in Delhi. The study followed a Quantitative Paradigm and used Semi-Structured Interview schedule to conduct face-to-face interviews with caregivers working directly with children across 14 residential homes. The research findings captured essential patterns of relationship between caregivers and their children and also established important linkages between the aspects of care-relationship and practices of residential homes with regard to care work. Drawing from findings of the research and insights developed from relevant literature in the national and international domain, the study brings out recommendations towards strengthening caregiver-child relationship in residential homes.


Keywords

Caregiver-Child Relationship, Residential Homes, Children in Need of Care and Protection.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Adler, J. (1976). The child care worker. New York: Brunner/Mazel.

  • Beker, J., Hustad, S., Gitelson, P., Kaminstein, P., & Adler, L. (1972). Critical incidents in child care. New York: Behavioural Publications.

  • Berridge, D., Biehal, N., & Henry, L. (n.d.). Living in children’s residential homes. United Kingdom: Department of Education.

  • Brannen, J., Statham, J., Mooney, A., & Michaela, B. (2007). The work and family lives of workers caring for venerable children. UK: The Policy Press.

  • Clough, R., Bullock, R., & Ward, A. (2006). What works in residential care: A review of research evidence and practical considerations. London: National Children’s Bureau.

  • Childline India Foundation. (2016). Annual Report 2016–2017. Mumbai: Childline India Foundation and Ministry of Women and Child Development.

  • Cocker, C., & Allain, L. (2008). Social work with looked after children. Glasgow: Learning Matters.

  • Crockenberg, S., Rutter, M., Bakermans-Kranenburg, M., Ijzendoorn, M., Juffer, F., & Collins, W. (2008). The effects of early socialemotional and relationship experience on the development of young orphanage children. Monographs of the Society for the Research in Child Development, 73, 1–298.

  • England, P. (2005). Emerging theories of care work. Annual Review os Sociology, 31, 381–399.

  • Goffman, E. (1961). Asylum, Essays on the social situation of mental patients and other inmates. USA: Anchor Books.

  • Government of India (2015). Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act. New Delhi: Gazette of India.

  • Government of India. (2016). Rules under Juvenile Justice(Care and Protection of Children) Act. New Delhi: Gazette of India.

  • Hadley Centre for Adoption and Foster Care Studies. (2015). Children and young people’s views of being in care. Bristol: University of Bristol.

  • Howe, D. (2005). Child abuse and neglect: Attachment, development and intervention.New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

  • Jones, H. (1970). The residential community. London: Routeledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

  • Kadushin, A., & Martin, J. (1980). Child welfare services. New York: Macmillan Publishing Co.

  • Kahan, B. (1979).Growing up in care: Ten people talking. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

  • Keane, M. (1954). The housemother: A member of the institutional team. Washington: National Conference of Catholic Charities.

  • Mayer, M. (1958). A guide for child-care workers. New York: Child Welfare League of America.

  • Modi, K., & Majumdar, K. (2014). Training workshops for better care and management of institutionalised children and young adults: A report. New Delhi: Udayan Care.

  • Muguwe, E. (2012). Caregiver’s perceptions of attachment and behavior exhibited by institutionalised children: Zimbabwean experience.Educational Research, 3(8), 669–676.

  • Nair, A. (2009). Importance of Caregiver. In M. Nigudkar, N. Dabir, N. Rathee, & A. Nair(Eds.), Towards quality care in residential homes for children: A training Manual for conducting sessions with care takers. Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

  • Quiroga, M., & Hamilton-Giahritsis, C. (2016). Attachment styles in children living in alternative care: A systematic review of the literature. Child Youth Care Forum, 45, 625–653.

  • Raphael, B., Stevens, G., & Pedersen, K. (2006). Vulnerability and mental health. Vulnerable Children and Youth Studies, 1(2), 127–136.

  • Sinclair, I., & Gibbs, I. (1998). Children’s homes. England: John Wiley and Sons.

  • Studies, H. C. (2015). Children and young people’s views of being in care. Bristol: University of Bristol.

  • Thomas, C. (1993). De-constructing concepts of care.Sociology, 27,649– 659.

  • United Nations. (2010). Guidelines of the alternative care of children. New York: United Nation.

  • Watzlawik, M., Guimaraes, D., Han, M., & Jung, A. (2016). First names as signs of personal identity: An intercultural comparison. Psychology & Society, 8(1), 1–21.

  • World Heath Organisation (WHO). (2004). Importance of Caregiver- Child Interactions for the Survival and Healthy Development of Young Children. Geneva: Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development.

  • Woolfolk, A. (2016). Educational psychology. Essex: Pearson Education Limited.

  • Zhao, J., Li, X., Barnett, D., Lin, X., Fang, X., Zhao, G., . . . Stanton, B. (2011). Prental Loss, Trusting Relationship with Current Caregivers and Psychological Adjustment among Children Affected by AIDS in China.Psychol Health Med., 16(4), 437–449.

  • United Nations. (1990). Convention on the Rights of the Child. United Nations.


Abstract Views: 256

PDF Views: 1




  • Caregiver-Child Relationship in Residential Homes for Children

Abstract Views: 256  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Maninder Kaur
TISS, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Residential homes in India provide an alternative to family-based care for an important number of children in need of care and protection. Children’s relationship within residential homes, especially with their caregivers, has a crucial role to play in their physical and psychological recovery from any traumatic experiences in their past, and in facilitating their cognitive, physical and psycho-social development in general. In view of the relevance of interactions between caregivers and child residents, this study attempted to understand the existing status of caregiver-child relationship in residential homes for children in Delhi. The study followed a Quantitative Paradigm and used Semi-Structured Interview schedule to conduct face-to-face interviews with caregivers working directly with children across 14 residential homes. The research findings captured essential patterns of relationship between caregivers and their children and also established important linkages between the aspects of care-relationship and practices of residential homes with regard to care work. Drawing from findings of the research and insights developed from relevant literature in the national and international domain, the study brings out recommendations towards strengthening caregiver-child relationship in residential homes.


Keywords


Caregiver-Child Relationship, Residential Homes, Children in Need of Care and Protection.

References