Open Access
Subscription Access
Open Access
Subscription Access
Comparison of Selected Journal Quality Indicators of Analytical Chemistry Journals
Subscribe/Renew Journal
Aim of this research study is to predict the correlation, if any, between the journal impact factor, SCImago ranking, Eigenfactor score and H-index of Analytical chemistry journals and quality of these journals. JIF is considered a good parameter for evaluation of scientific journals but has been criticized on many counts such as self-citation, limitation to English language etc. Seventy five (75) analytical chemistry journals indexed in WoS and Scopus databases were selected in this research for comparison of various indices. Correlations between indices (JIF, ES, SJR, and H-index) were evaluated using Pearson and Spearson’s correlation. Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry was at the top with JIF of 8.0 and the lowest for American Laboratory journal with JIF of 0.028. In case of SCImago ranking, Eigen factor score and H-index, highest valued journals were reported as Annual Review of Analytical Chemistry (SJR = 3.078), Analytical Chemistry (ES = 0.1588) and Analytical Chemistry (H-index = 109). Lowest valued journals were reported as American Laboratory journal (SJR = 0.106), Archeosciences-Revue D Archeometrie (ES = 0.0001) and Instrumentation Science and Technology (H-index = 0). Throughout the study, none of the journals had the same ranking to compare different indicators. Pearson’s correlation between JIF and SJR values reached a high value (0.936) as compared to either ES (0.558) or H5 (0.567).
Keywords
- Ascaso F.J. (2011). Impact factor, eigenfactor and article influence. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol, 86:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oftal.2010.12.005. PMid:21414522.
- Garfield E. (2006). The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. JAMA,295:90–93. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90. PMid:16391221
- Seglen P.O. (1997). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. BMJ, 314:498–502. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.314.7079.497. PMid:9056804, PMCid:PMC2126010.
- Postma E. (2007). Inflated impact factors? The true impact of evolutionary papers in non-evolutionary journals. PLoS One, 2:e999. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0000999. PMid:17912376 PMCid:PMC1994586.
- Motamed M.; Mehta D.; Basavaraj S. and Fuad F. (2002). Self citations and impact factors in otolaryngology journals. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci., 27:318–20. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.13652273.2002.00574.x. PMid:12383288.
- Mario Cantín M.; Mu-oz and Ignacio Roa. (2015). Comparison between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Score, and SCImago Journal Rank Indicator in Anatomy and Morphology Journals, Int. J. Morphol., 33(3):1183−88. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-95022015000300060.
- Ramin S. and Sarraf Shirazi A. (2012). Comparison between Impact factor, SCImago journal rank indicator and Eigenfactor score of nuclear medicine journals. Nucl. Med. Rev. Cent. East Eur., 15(2):132−36. PMid:22936507.
- Kianifar H.; Sadeghi R. and Zarifmahmoudi L. (2014). Comparison between Impact Factor, Eigenfactor Metrics, and SCimago Journal Rank Indicator of Pediatric Neurology Journals. Acta Inform. Med., 22(2):103−6. https://doi.org/10.5455/aim.2014.22.103-106. PMid:24825934 PMCid: PMC4008039.
- Zarifmahmoudi L.; Jamshid Jamali J. and Sadeghi R. (2015). Google Scholar journal metrics: Comparison with impact factor andSCImago journal rank indicator for nuclear medicine journals. Iran J. Nucl. Med., 23(1):8−14.
- Garcia-Pachon E. and Arencibia-Jorge R. (2014). A Comparison of the Impact Factor and the SCImago Journal Rank Index in Respiratory System Journals. Arch Bronconeumol, Letters to the Editor, 50:308–09. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arbres.2013.10.006. PMid:24315384.
Abstract Views: 276
PDF Views: 15