Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Dermatoglyphics and ABO Blood Groups, an Observational Study


Affiliations
1 (GPRST1 with the East Cumbria GP Training Programme), Education Centre, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, Cumbria- CA2 7HY, United Kingdom
2 Dept. of Physiology, Government Medical College, Gandhinagar, Kottayam, Kerala, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objectives: (a) To study distribution of finger print pattern among the subjects having different ABO and Rh blood group and (b) Identify any relation between their characters and blood groups.

Methods: 313 students at PIMS&RC were selected over a period of 6 months, their blood groups were ascertained and their finger prints studied. Fingerprints were grouped under 3 major categories, i.e. Loops, whorls and arches. Association was assessed statistically using chi-square test.

Results: Male: female ratio was 1.8:1. Majority of the subjects (35.78%) in the study were of blood group O Positive followed by blood group B Positive, A Positive, AB Positive, O Negative, B Negative, A Negative and finally AB Negative, of whom 93.93% were Rh-positive. The general distribution of pattern of finger print showed high frequency (61.35%) of loops whereas whorls were moderate (35.14%) and arches were least (3.51%) in frequency. Almost same order was noticed in both Rh-positive and Rhnegative individuals or A, B, AB and O blood groups. Blood group O Positive showed more loops (62.86%) while, blood group B Negative had more whorls (55%) and blood group O Negative had more chances of having arches (6.67%) as compared to other blood groups. The ring finger more often has whorls (52.72%), where as the little finger more often has loops (79.23), both cases true irrespective of the blood group.

Conclusion: The study suggests an association between finger print pattern and blood group. The distribution of different pattern of finger prints in individual fingers also showed some peculiarities in relation to blood group.


Keywords

Finger Print, Dermatoglyphic, Dactylography, Identification
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Modi. Text Book of Forensic Medicine. Medical Jurisprudence- Personal Identification. 4th Edn, Vol 1. JP printers, Delhi; 2004, pp: 714
  • Purkinge JE. Physiological Examination of the Visual Organ and of the Cutaneous System. (Commentatio de Examine Physiologico Organi Visus et Systematis Cutanei) Breslau: Vratisaviae Typis Universitatis, 1823. (Translated into English by Cummins, H, and R.W. Kennedy, Am.J.Crim.Law.Criminol. 1940; 31, pp. 343-356)
  • Faulds H. On the Skin furrows of the hand. Nature. 1880; 22:605
  • Herschel WJ. Skin Furrows of the hand. Nature. 1880; 23:76
  • Cummins H. Palmar and Plantar Epidermal Ridge Configuration (Dermatoglyphics) in Europeans and Americans. Am. J. Phy. Anthrop. 1926; 179: 741-802.
  • Galton F. Finger Prints. London: Macmillian and Co. 1892
  • Jain A.K. Manual of Practical Physiology, Determination of Blood Groups. 1st Edn, Vol 1. Avichal Publishing Company, Sirmour (H.P). 2000. 45-48
  • Reed T, Meier R. Taking Dermatoglyphic Prints- A Self Instruction Manual. Indiana University School of Medicine (Indianapolis) and Indiana University (Bloomington), USA.
  • Bloterogel H and Bloterogel W. Blutgrype and Dactylogramm: Konstitution Merk Male Der Poliomyelitis. Krapan Zt Rehsf Hindrih, 1934; 56: 143-163.
  • Hahne KW. Die Benfung Der Blutgramppen and Test Figures in Vaterschafts Process. Dissertation Bern 1929.
  • Herch M. Papillarmuster Bei Engeotorenen Der Loyalty Inschm, Berichungan Swischen Papillarmuster and Bluntgrainppen Beidiessen An Liner Dentschem Verglei Chsgrmppe. Ztschr. F. Rasseh Physio: 1932; 5: 163-168
  • Gowda MST and Rao CP. A Study To Evaluate Relationship Between Dermatoglyphic Features And Blood Groups. J Anat. Society of INd. 1996; 45: 39
  • Bharadwaja A, Saraswat PK, Aggarwal SK, Banerji P, Bharadwaja S. Pattern of finger-prints in different ABO blood groups. JIAFM. 2004; 26(1): pp 6-9

Abstract Views: 1024

PDF Views: 2




  • Dermatoglyphics and ABO Blood Groups, an Observational Study

Abstract Views: 1024  |  PDF Views: 2

Authors

Revin Thomas
(GPRST1 with the East Cumbria GP Training Programme), Education Centre, Cumberland Infirmary, Carlisle, Cumbria- CA2 7HY, United Kingdom
Saritha J Shenoy
Dept. of Physiology, Government Medical College, Gandhinagar, Kottayam, Kerala, India

Abstract


Objectives: (a) To study distribution of finger print pattern among the subjects having different ABO and Rh blood group and (b) Identify any relation between their characters and blood groups.

Methods: 313 students at PIMS&RC were selected over a period of 6 months, their blood groups were ascertained and their finger prints studied. Fingerprints were grouped under 3 major categories, i.e. Loops, whorls and arches. Association was assessed statistically using chi-square test.

Results: Male: female ratio was 1.8:1. Majority of the subjects (35.78%) in the study were of blood group O Positive followed by blood group B Positive, A Positive, AB Positive, O Negative, B Negative, A Negative and finally AB Negative, of whom 93.93% were Rh-positive. The general distribution of pattern of finger print showed high frequency (61.35%) of loops whereas whorls were moderate (35.14%) and arches were least (3.51%) in frequency. Almost same order was noticed in both Rh-positive and Rhnegative individuals or A, B, AB and O blood groups. Blood group O Positive showed more loops (62.86%) while, blood group B Negative had more whorls (55%) and blood group O Negative had more chances of having arches (6.67%) as compared to other blood groups. The ring finger more often has whorls (52.72%), where as the little finger more often has loops (79.23), both cases true irrespective of the blood group.

Conclusion: The study suggests an association between finger print pattern and blood group. The distribution of different pattern of finger prints in individual fingers also showed some peculiarities in relation to blood group.


Keywords


Finger Print, Dermatoglyphic, Dactylography, Identification

References