Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Quality of Work Life and its Relationship with Work Performance-A Study of Employees of Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited


Affiliations
1 Himachal Pradesh University Business School, H.P. University, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
2 Himachal Pradesh University Business School, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The concept of Quality of Work Life (QWL) has become inevitable for an organization’s survival and growth in the present era of competition, complexity and rapid advancements. QWL is of paramount importance in improving the morale and motivation of employees, and hence their performance. Thus, it has become immensely important to measure and enhance the QWL of employees in order to ensure that they are satisfied and perform better.

Keeping this in view, the present study has been conducted to study the Quality of Work Life of employees and its relationship with their Work Performance. A sample of 250 employees of Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (HPPCL) was selected by using convenience sampling technique.

Results of the present study reveal that there is a positive and strong relationship between Overall QWL and Overall Work Performance of HPPCL employees. All eight QWL dimensions taken in the study have been found to contribute to enhance the Overall QWL. The QWL dimensions have also been found to have a positive, and either a strong or a moderate relationship with Overall Work Performance.


Keywords

Quality of Work Life, Work Performance, HPPCL, Working Conditions, Compensation.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aarthy, M., & Nandhini, M. (2016). A study on quality of work life among the engineering college faculty members in Coimbatore district. International Journal of Management Research & Review, 6(7), 1051-1057.
  • Barney, J. B. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 1(17), 99-120.
  • Cascio, W. F. (2006). Managing human resources: Productivity, quality of life, profits. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Gayathiri, R., & Ramakrishnan, L. (2013). Quality of Work Life - Linkage with Job Satisfaction and Performance. International Journal of Business and Management Invention, 2(1), 1-8.
  • Geetha, R., & Mani, R. S. (2016). Quality of work life: A literature review. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(16), 8928-8931.
  • Greenhaus, J. H., Bedeian, A. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1987). Work experiences, job performances and feelings of personal and family well-being. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 31(2), 200-215.
  • Gupta, M., & Sharma, P. (2011). Factor credentials boosting quality of work life of BSNL employees in Jammu region. Sri Krishna International Research & Educational Consortium, 2(1), 79-89.
  • Hsu, M., & Kernohan, G. (2006). Quality of working life. Nursing and Healthcare Management and Policy, 120-131.
  • Islam, Z., & Siengthai, S. (2009). Quality of work life and organizational performance: Empirical evidence from Dhaka Export Processing Zone. ILO Conference on Regulating for Decent Work, 1-19.
  • Jayakumar, A., & Kalaiselvi, K. (2012). Quality of work life - An overview. International Journal of Marketing, Financial Services & Management Research, 1(10), 140-151.
  • Kaighobadi, S., Esteghlal, A. & Mohebbi, S. (2014). The relationship between quality of work life and performance of the managers of SMEs of Shiraz industrial town: Case study in Iran. European Journal of Business and Management, 6(23), 220-227.
  • Koopmans, L. (2014). Measuring individual work performance (Thesis). Body@Work, Research Center on Physical Activity, Work and Health, the Netherlands. ISBN- 978-94-6203-559-1.
  • Naharuddin, N. M. & Sadeqi, M. (2013). Factors of workplace environment that affect employee’s performance: A case study of Miyazu, Malaysia. International Journal of Independent Research and Studies- IJIRS, 2(2), 66-78.
  • Nayak, T., & Sahoo, C. K. (2015). Quality of work life and organizational performance: The mediating role of employee commitment. Journal of Health Management, 17(3), 263-273.
  • Papi, A., & Nuralizadeh, R. (2014). Investigating the Relationship between the Quality of Work Life and the Emergence of Organizational Citizenship Behavior among Primary School Teachers in Andimeshk. International Journal On New Trends in Education and Literature, 1(4), 32-42.
  • Phan, G. T., & Vo, T. Q. (2016). A literature review on quality of working life: A case of healthcare workers. Journal of Applied Pharmaceutical Science, 6(7), 193-200.
  • Prasetya, A. & Kato, M. (2011). The effect of financial and non financial compensation to the employee performance. 2nd International Research Symposium in Service Management.
  • Rai, R., & Tripathi, S. (2015). A Study on QWL and its effects on Job Performance. Apeejay- Journal of Management Sciences and Technology, 2(2), 33-42.
  • Rethinam, G. S., & Ismail, M. (2008). Constructs of quality of work life: A perspective of information and technology professionals. European Journal of Social Science, 7(1), 58-70.
  • Robbins, S. (1989). Organizational behavior: Concepts, controversies and applications. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Robbins, S.P. (2001). Organizational Behavior. New Jersey: Pearson Education International.
  • Rose, R. C., et al (2006). Quality of Work Life: Implications of Career Dimensions. Journal of Social Sciences, 2(2), 61-67.
  • Saklani, D. (2004). Quality of work life in the Indian context: An empirical investigation. Decision, 31(2), 101-135.
  • Shahbazi, B., et al (2011). A Survey of relationship between the quality of work life and performance of Department Chairpersons of Esfahan University and Esfahan Medical Science University. Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1555-1560.
  • Sheel, S., et al. (2012). Quality of work life, employee performance and career growth opportunities: A literature review. International Journal of Multidisciplinary Research, 2(2), 291-300.
  • Stannack, P. (1996). Perspective on employee’s performance. Management Research News, l19(4/5), 38-40.
  • Straw, R. J., & Heckscher, C. C. (1984). QWL: New working relationships in the communication industry. Labor Studies Journal, 9, 261-274.
  • Tabassum, A., Rahman, T. & Jahan, K. (2011). A comparative analysis of quality of work life among the employees of local private and foreign commercial banks in Bangladesh. World Journal of Social Science, 1(1), 17-33.
  • Thakur, R., & Sharma, D. (2018). An Empirical Research on the Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Work Performance of Employees of Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited. Pratibimba, 18(2), 57-63.
  • Timossi, L.S., et al. (2008). Evaluation of quality of work life: An adaptation from the Walton’s QWL model. Proceedings of the XIV International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management- The integration of productive chain with an approach to sustainable manufacturing (pp. 1-17). Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
  • Viswesvaran, C., & Ones, D. S. (2000). Perspectives on models of job performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 8(4), 216-226.
  • Walton, R. E. (1975). Criteria for quality of working life. In L.E. Davis, A.B. Cherns, & Associates (Eds), The quality of working life (pp. 91-104). New York: The Free Press.

Abstract Views: 307

PDF Views: 0




  • Quality of Work Life and its Relationship with Work Performance-A Study of Employees of Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited

Abstract Views: 307  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Reetika Thakur
Himachal Pradesh University Business School, H.P. University, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India
Dinesh Sharma
Himachal Pradesh University Business School, Summer Hill, Shimla, Himachal Pradesh, India

Abstract


The concept of Quality of Work Life (QWL) has become inevitable for an organization’s survival and growth in the present era of competition, complexity and rapid advancements. QWL is of paramount importance in improving the morale and motivation of employees, and hence their performance. Thus, it has become immensely important to measure and enhance the QWL of employees in order to ensure that they are satisfied and perform better.

Keeping this in view, the present study has been conducted to study the Quality of Work Life of employees and its relationship with their Work Performance. A sample of 250 employees of Himachal Pradesh Power Corporation Limited (HPPCL) was selected by using convenience sampling technique.

Results of the present study reveal that there is a positive and strong relationship between Overall QWL and Overall Work Performance of HPPCL employees. All eight QWL dimensions taken in the study have been found to contribute to enhance the Overall QWL. The QWL dimensions have also been found to have a positive, and either a strong or a moderate relationship with Overall Work Performance.


Keywords


Quality of Work Life, Work Performance, HPPCL, Working Conditions, Compensation.

References