Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Rural Livelihoods in Distress-The Case of District Mewat (Haryana)


Affiliations
1 Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Ensuring rural livelihood security in a sustainable manner is a crucial issue that is increasingly gaining ground in all poverty alleviation policy discourse in India. The viability of rural livelihoods is contingent upon the context of an area and the resultant access to adequate resources or capital assets. This paper examines the contextual factors and constraints impeding livelihoods in Mewat, a backward district in Haryana. The study builds on a referenced literature review, secondary data and the primary empirical data obtained through participatory livelihood analysis carried out in five selected villages. In doing so, the demographic characteristics, livelihood activities, asset portfolios and associated problems in respective villages have been assessed. The study locale is found to be beset by a plethora of impediments and characterised with very low capital asset endowments. The paper thus attempts to offer important insights into the main arenas of policy or project interventions for mitigation of distress and optimizing livelihood potential in the district.

Keywords

Rural Livelihoods, Mewat, Capital Assets.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akbar, I. (2010). A new chapter for Mewat. The Indian Express.
  • Bebbington, A. (1999). Capitals and capabilities: A framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Development, 27(12), 2021-2044.
  • Bezemer, D. J., & Davis, J. R. (2003). The rural non-farm economy in Armenia: Overview of fi ndings. Natural Resource Institute, Chatham. unpublished mimeo.
  • Bhalla, S. (2000). Behind Poverty: The Qualitative Deterioration of Employment Prospects for Rural Indian, Working Paper 7, New Delhi: Institute for Human Development.
  • Blaikie, P., Cannon, T., Davis, I., & Wisner, B. (1994). At Risk: Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. London: Routledge.
  • Carney, D. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: What Contribution can we Make? DFID, London.
  • Census (2011). A Government of India website. Retrieved from www.censusindia.gov.in.
  • Chambers, R., &. Conway, G.R. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century. Institute of Development Studies.
  • Coppard, D. (2001). The rural non-farm economy in India: A review of the literature, NRI Report No. 2662, Chatham: NRI.
  • DFID (2002). Better livelihoods for poor people: the role of land policy, consultation document. London: Department for International Development Retrieved from http://www.dfid.gov.uk/
  • Drinkwater, M., & Rusinow, T. (1999). Application of CARE’s livelihood approach. Paper presented at the National Resource Advisors’ Conference (NRAC) 1999. Retrieved from http://www.livelihoods.org/info/nrac/care.pdf
  • Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries: Analysis, policy, methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
  • Frankenberger, T. (1999). Household livelihood security: A holistic approach for addressing poverty and vulnerability. CARE
  • Gandhi, B. V. J., Sharma, L., & Maheshwri, P. (2009). Escaping poverty in rural mewat - case studies from an integrated approach. Research Bulletin no 1. IRRAD Publications.
  • Hogger, R. (2004). Understanding livelihood systems as complex wholes. In R. Baumgartner (Ed.), In search of sustainable livelihood systems. Managing resources and change (pp. 35-53). New Delhi: Sage Publication.
  • Indian Institute For Human Development (IIHD). (2008). A baseline survey of minority concentration Districts of India. Mewat : Haryana.
  • Jatrana, S. (1999). Determinants and differentials of infant mortality in Mewat region of Haryana State, India. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Demography Program, Research School of Social Sciences, Canberra, The Australian National University. Retreived from adsri.anu. edu.au
  • Jha, S. (2012, April 7). Meo Muslims - Left out of the development loop. Hindustan Times:Alwar.
  • Mayaram, S. (1998). Meos of Mewat -Synthesising Hindu-Muslim Identities. Manushi. 102, 17-22. http://free.freespeech.org/manushj/103/meomaha.htm1.
  • Meikle, S. (2002). The urban context and poor people' in Rakodi, C. with Lloyd-Jones, T. (eds) Urban Livelihoods: A People-Centred Approach to Reducing Poverty, Earthscan, London, 37-51.
  • Mewat Development Agency (MDA) (2009). Retrieved from http://mda.nic.in/Mewat-Glance.htm. Acessed in November 2011
  • Mortimore, M. (1993). Population growth and land degradation. Geojournal, 31(1), 15-21.
  • NSSO. (2011). Employment and Unemployment Situation in India, Key Results of NSS 66th Round (2009-2010), National Sample Survey Organisation, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation,Government of India
  • Saifi , M.Y. (2010, August 11). Mewat drowned in bad customs. The Eastern Post Weekly.
  • SANDRP. (2004). Dams Rivers and People. SANDRP, 2(7-8).
  • Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable Rural Livelihoods: A framework for analysis. Institute of Development Studies Working Paper 72. University of Sussex: Brighton.
  • Sharma, L. (2008). Saline ground water pockets in Mewat: Prevalence, challenges andsolutions' in The Reader on Water and Health . New Delhi: Sagepublications.
  • Tanwar B.S., & Kruseman, G.P. (1985). Saline ground water management in Haryana state, India. Hydrogeology in the Service of Man, Memoirs of the 18th Congress of the International Association of Hydrogeologists, Cambridge, 24-30.
  • Woolcock, M. (1998). Social capital and economic development: towards a theoretical synthesis and policy framework. Theory and Society, 27(2), 151-208

Abstract Views: 418

PDF Views: 4




  • Rural Livelihoods in Distress-The Case of District Mewat (Haryana)

Abstract Views: 418  |  PDF Views: 4

Authors

Bindiya Narang
Department of Social Work, Jamia Millia Islamia University, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Ensuring rural livelihood security in a sustainable manner is a crucial issue that is increasingly gaining ground in all poverty alleviation policy discourse in India. The viability of rural livelihoods is contingent upon the context of an area and the resultant access to adequate resources or capital assets. This paper examines the contextual factors and constraints impeding livelihoods in Mewat, a backward district in Haryana. The study builds on a referenced literature review, secondary data and the primary empirical data obtained through participatory livelihood analysis carried out in five selected villages. In doing so, the demographic characteristics, livelihood activities, asset portfolios and associated problems in respective villages have been assessed. The study locale is found to be beset by a plethora of impediments and characterised with very low capital asset endowments. The paper thus attempts to offer important insights into the main arenas of policy or project interventions for mitigation of distress and optimizing livelihood potential in the district.

Keywords


Rural Livelihoods, Mewat, Capital Assets.

References