Open Access Subscription Access
Open Access Subscription Access
A Structural Equation Model of Women Empowerment Through Self-Help Groups in Rajasthan
The main objective of the present study is to identify the association between microfinance and women empowerment. In other words, an attempt has been made to find out as to how effective microfinance has been in empowering women through their self-employment. The women linked with Self-Help Groups (SHGs) in Rajasthan are taken as a target population for this paper. For this purpose, multi-stage random sampling technique has been used. Dausa district of Rajasthan has been chosen for the field study. Lawan block has been randomly selected. Thirty-eight SHGs have been selected by random sampling. Women linked with SHG are taken as sampling unit. The randomly selected 500 women were interviewed and their views were collected through structured questionnaire under the household survey administered during the months of January-February 2018. The study identified four significant factors of empowerment viz., Economic, Autonomy, Network, communication and political participation, and Social Attitude. Among these, empowerment by the economic factor is the most effective. In fact, economic factors are twice as effective in empowering women as members’ autonomy and network, communication and political participation factors. Without doubt, the social attitudes are also decisive in terms of their contribution to women empowerment, but are about 85% as effective as the economic factors. Education factor is unable to capture statistical significance to influence the women’s empowerment.
Empowerment of Women, Economic Factors, Microfinance, Non-Economic Factors, Rajasthan, Structural Equation Modeling.
- Anderson, S., & Eswaran, M. (2005). What determines female autonomy? Evidence from Bangladesh. Working paper, 101, Bureau for Research and Economic Analysis of Development.
- Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The economics of microfinance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Bali Swain, R. (2007). Impacting women through Microfinance. Dialogue, Appui au Developpement Autonome, 37, 61-82.
- Bali Swain, R., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2009). Does microfinance empower women? Evidence from self-help groups in India. International Review of Applied Economics, 23(5), 541-556.
- Bali Swain, R., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2012). Economic or non-economic factors - What empowers women? International Review of Applied Economics, 26(4), 425-444.
- Bali Swain, R., & Wallentin, F. Y. (2014). The impact of Microfinance on factors empowering Women: Regional and Delivery Mechanisms in India’s SHG Programme. Working Paper No. 492, Centre for International Development, Stanford University.
- Bardhan, K., & Klasen, S. (1999). UNDP’s gender-related indices: A critical review. World Development, 27, 985-1010.
- Beteta, H. C. (2006). What is missing in measures of women’s empowerment? Journal of Human Development, 7(2), 221-241.
- Bobonis, G. J. (2008). Is the Allocation of Resources within the Household Efficient? New Evidence from a Randomized Experiment. Manuscript, Department of Economics, University of Toronto and CIFAR.
- Bourguignon, F., Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. A. (2008). Efficient intra-household allocations and distribution factors: Implications and identification. Review of Economic Studies, forthcoming.
- Browning, M., & Chiappori, P. A. (1998). Efficient intra-household allocation: A general characterization and empirical tests. Econometrica, 66(6), 1241-78.
- Deaton, A. (1997). The analysis of household surveys: A Microeconometric Approach to Development Policy. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Dijkstra, G. (2002). Revisiting UNDP’s GDI and GEM Toward an alternative. Social Indicators Research, 57(3), 301-338.
- Durrant, V. L., & Sathar, Z. A. (2000). Greater investment in children through women’s empowerment. A Key to Demographic Change in Pakistan. Working Paper No. 137. Policy Research Division, Population Council, USA.
- Gefen, D., Straub, D., & Boudreau, M. (2000). Structural equation modeling and regression: Guidelines for research practice. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 4(7), 1-77.
- Goetz, A. M., & Sen Gupta, R. (1996). Who takes the Credit? Gender, Power, and Control Over Loan Use in Rural Credit Programme in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(1), 45M63
- Fredrik, G. (2013). The Impact of Microcredit on Women’s Empowerment - A Case Study of Microcredit in the Tangail district, Bangladesh. Bachelor Thesis Minor Field Study Series No. 225. Department of Economics, the University of Lund, Sweden.
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2006). Multivariate Data Analysis (6th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc., Upper Saddle River, New Jersey 07458.
- Hashemi, S. M., & Schuler, S. R. (1993). Defining and Studying Empowerment of Women: A Research Note From Bangladesh. JSI Working Paper No.3. Arlington, Virginia.
- Hashemi, S. M., Schuler, S. R., & Riley, A. P. (1996). Rural credit programs and women’s empowerment in Bangladesh. World Development, 24(4), 635-653.
- Holvoet, N. (2005). The Impact of Microfinance on Decision-Making Agency: Evidence from South India. Development and Change, 36(1), 75-102.
- Joreskog, G., & Sorbom, D. (2001). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide, Scientific software international Inc., Lincolnwood, IL.
- Joshi, S. (2004). Female Household Headship in Rural Bangladesh. Determinants and Impact on Children’s Schooling. Discussion Paper No.894. Economic Growth Center, Yale University.
- Kabeer, N. (1999). From Feminist Insights to an Analytical Framework: An Institutional Perspective on Gender Inequality. Institutions, Relations and Outcomes: A Framework and Case Studies for Gender Aware Planning, Kali for Women, New Delhi and Zed Press, London.
- Kato, M., & Kratzer, J. (2013). Empowering women through microfinance: Evidence from Tanzania. ACRN Journal of Entrepreneurship Perspectives, 2(1), 31-59.
- Lancaster, G., Maitra, P., & Ray, R. (2003). Endogenous Power, Household Expenditure Pattern and New Targets of Gender Bias. Evidence from India. Preliminary Version of Paper Presented at the NEUDC Conference, Yale.
- Mahmud, S. (2003). Actually how empowering is microcredit? Development and Change, 34(4), 577-605.
- Malhotra, A., Schuler S. R., & Boender, C. (2002). Measuring Women’s Empowerment as a Variable in International Development. International Center for Research on Women and the Gender and Development Group of the World Bank.
- Mosedale, S. (2005). Assessing women’s empowerment: Toward a conceptual framework. Journal of International Development, 17, 243-57.
- Pitt, M., & Khandker, S. R. (1998). The Impact of group-Based credit programs on poor households in Bangladesh: Does the gender of participants matter? The Journal of Political Economy, 106, 958-996.
- Pitt, M., Khandker, S. K., & Cartwright, J. (2006). Empowering women with microfinance: Evidence from Bangladesh. Economic Development and Cultural Change, pp. 791- 831.
- Pitt, M. M., Khandker, S. R., Chowdhury, O. H., & Millimet, D. L. (2003). Credit program for the poor and the health status of children in rural Bangladesh. International Economic Review, 44(1), 958-996.
- Presser, H. B., & Sen, G. (2000). Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Laying the Groundwork. In Women’s Empowerment and Demographic Processes: Moving Beyond Cairo, International Studies in Demography (pp. 4-11), edited by H. B. Presser and G. Sen. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Schuler, S. R., & Hashemi, S. M. (1994). Credit programs, women’s empowerment, and contraceptive use in Rural Bangladesh. Studies in Family Planning, 25(2), 65-76.
- Schultz, T. P. (1990). Testing the neoclassical model of family labor supply and fertility. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 599-634.
- Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, New Delhi.
- Thomas, D. (1990). Intra-household resource allocation: An inferential approach. Journal of Human Resources, 25(4), 635-64.
- Weiss, Y., & Willis, R. J. (1985). Children as collective goods and divorce settlements. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(3), 268-92.
Abstract Views: 6
PDF Views: 0