Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Organisational Justice, Experiencing Interpersonal Conflict and Employee Engagement: A Moderated Mediation Analysis


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
2 University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Interpersonal conflict in a workplace is related to increased employee turnover rates, reduced creativity, and employee disengagement. Present study intends to examine how organisational justice can be related to lesser interpersonal conflict, i.e., task conflict, relationship conflict, and increased employee engagement. Data for the present study have been collected from 650 employees working in multinational corporations located in Gurgaon. Data collected have been validated using confirmatory factor analyses and hypotheses have been tested through structure equation modelling. Further, reliability and validity of data were confirmed. PROCESS has been applied to examine moderated-mediation. Results reveal that interpersonal conflict and employee engagement are negatively related, organisational justice is related to lesser conflict, organisational justice is positively related to employee engagement, and organisational justice is indirectly related to employee engagement through interpersonal conflict, but only when organisational justice is weak. The present study contributes to the existing literature by exploring that organisational justice may not only prevent conflict, but also affect how employees react when subjected to conflict. This study has been restricted to multinational corporations and Indian context only, which can be extended to other sectors and countries. This study contributes to the literature on employee engagement and the Job-Demand-Resource Theory by highlighting the moderating role of organisational justice. Present study confirms that organisational justice contributes to maintaining low levels of conflict as well as high levels of employee engagement.

Keywords

Organisational Justice, Task Conflict, Relationship Conflict, Employee Engagement.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in experimental social psychology, 2, 267-299.
  • Amason, A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: Resolving a paradox for top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 123-148.
  • Ambrose, M. L., Seabright, M. A., & Schminke, M. (2002). Sabotage in the workplace: The role of organizational injustice. Organisational behaviour and human decision processes, 89(1), 947-965.
  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modelling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423.
  • Arbuckle, J. L., & Wothke, W. (2004). Amos 4.0 Users Guide, 1999. Kline Rex B., Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling, NY, London.
  • Bies, R. J. (2005). Are procedural justice and interactional justice conceptually distinct?
  • Bies, R. J., & Shapiro, D. L. (1988). Voice and justification: Their influence on procedural fairness judgments. Academy of Management Journal, 31(3), 676-685.
  • Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Transaction Publishers.
  • Bond, S. A., Tuckey, M. R., & Dollard, M. F. (2010). Psychosocial safety climate, workplace bullying, and symptoms of posttraumatic stress. Organisation Development Journal, 28(1), 37-52.
  • Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 86(2), 278-321.
  • Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: a construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3), 386-398.
  • Colquitt, J. A., & Chertkoff, J. M. (2002). Explaining injustice: The interactive effect of explanation and outcome on fairness perceptions and task motivation. Journal of Management, 28(5), 591-610.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Judge, T. A., & Shaw, J. C. (2006). Justice and personality: Using integrative theories to derive moderators of justice effects. Organisational Behaviour and Human Decision Processes, 100(1), 110-127.
  • Crawford, E. R., Lepine J. A., &Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834-848.
  • Crawshaw, J. R., Cropanzano, R., Bell, C. M., & Nadisic, T. (2013). Organisational justice: New insights from behavioural ethics. Human Relations, 66(7), 885-904.
  • Cropanzano, R., & Randall, M. L. (1993). Injustice and work behaviour: A historical review.
  • Friedman, R. A., Tidd, S. T., Currall, S. C., &Tsai, J.C. (2000). What goes around comes around: The impact of personal conflict styles on work conflict and stress. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 32-55.
  • Dijkstra, M. T. M., De Dreu C. K. W., Evers A., Van Dierendonck. D. (2009). Passive responses to interpersonal conflict at work amplify employee strain. European Journal of Work Organisational Psychology, 18, 405-432.
  • Colquitt, J. A., Greenberg, J., & Scott, B. A. (2005). Organisational justice: Where do we stand? In
  • J. A. Colquitt & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Handbook of Organizational Justice (pp. 589-619). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
  • Greenberg, J. (1990). Organisational justice: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Journal of Management, 16(2), 399-432.
  • Greenberg, J., & Folger, R. (1983). Procedural justice, participation and the fair process effect in groups. Basic group processes, 235-258.
  • Guerra, J. M., Matinez, I., Munduate, L., & Medina, F. J. (2005). A contingency perspective on the study of the consequences of conflict types: The role of organizational culture. European Journal of Work and Organisational Psychology, 14(2), 157-176.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2009). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Hayes, J. R. (2013). The complete problem solver. Routledge.
  • Van Emmerik, I. J., Bakker, A. B., & Euwema, M. C. (2009). Explaining employees’ evaluations of organizational change with the job-demands resources model. Career Development International, 14(6), 594-613.
  • Ilies, R., Johnson, M. D., Judge, T. A., & Keeney, J. (2011). A within-individual study of interpersonal conflict as a work stressor: Dispositional and situational moderators. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 32(1), 44-64.
  • Jehn, K. A. (1995). A multi-method examination of the benefits and detriments of intra-group conflict. Administrative science quarterly, 256-282.
  • Johnson, R. A., & Wichern, D. W. (2001). Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis (5th Ed.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
  • Kernan, M. C., & Hanges, P. J. (2002). Survivor reactions to reorganization: Antecedents and consequences of procedural, interpersonal, and informational justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(5), 916.
  • Kerwin, S., Doherty, A., & Harman, A. (2011). It’s Not Conflict, It’s Differences of Opinion: An In-Depth Examination of Conflict in Non-profit Boards. Small Group Research, 42(5), 562-594.
  • Kline, R. B. (1998). Software review: Software programs for structural equation modeling: Amos, EQS, and LISREL. Journal of Psycho-educational Assessment, 16(4), 343-364.
  • Konovsky, M. A., & Cropanzano, R. (1991). Perceived fairness of employee drug testing as a predictor of employee attitudes and job performance. Journal of applied psychology, 76(5), 698-712.
  • Lages, C. R., & Piercy, N. F. (2012). Key drivers of frontline employee generation of ideas for customer service improvement. Journal of Service Research, 15(2), 215-230.
  • Levine, R. (1998). The legal environment, banks, and long-run economic growth. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 596-613.
  • Li, A., & Cropanzano, R. (2009). Fairness at the group level: Justice Climate and intra-unit justice climate. Journal of Management, 35(3), 564-599.
  • Macey, W. H., & Schneider, B. (2008). The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and organisational Psychology, 1(1), 3-30.
  • Malhotra, N. K., & Dash, S. (2010). Marketing research: An applied orientation (6th Ed.). New Delhi: Pearson Education.
  • Masterson, S. S., Lewis, K., Goldman, B. M., & Taylor, M. S. (2000). Integrating justice and social exchange: The differing effects of fair procedures and treatment on work relationships. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 738-748.
  • May, D. R., Gilson, R. L., & Harter, L. M. (2004). The psychological conditions of meaningfulness, safety and availability and the engagement of the human spirit at work. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 77(1), 11-37.
  • Moorman, R. H., Blakely, G. L., & Niehoff, B. P. (1998). Does perceived organizational support mediate the relationship between procedural justice and organizational citizenship behaviour? Academy of Management journal, 41(3), 351-357.
  • Nowakowski, J. M., & Conlon, D. E. (2005). Organisational justice: Looking back, looking forward. International Journal of Conflict Management, 16(1), 4-29.
  • Pelled, L. H. (1996). Demographic diversity, conflict and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organisation Science, 7(6), 615-631.
  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879-890.
  • Priesemuth, M., Arnaud, A., & Schminke, M. (2013). Bad behaviour in groups: The impact of overall justice climate and functional dependence on counterproductive work behaviour in work units. Group & Organisation Management, 38(2), 230-257.
  • Roberson, Q. M., & Colquitt, J. A. (2005). Shared and configural justice: A social network model of justice in teams. Academy of Management Review, 30(3), 595-607.
  • Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Sage Publications.
  • Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and psychological measurement, 66(4), 701-716.
  • Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Roma, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
  • Schweiger, D. M., & Denisi, A. S. (1991). Communication with employees following a merger: A longitudinal field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 34(1), 110-135.
  • Seiders, K., Voss, G. B., Godfrey, A. L., & Grewal, D. (2007). SERVCON: Developing and Validation of a Multidimensional Service Convenience Scale. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 35(1), 144-156.
  • Spector, P. E., & Fox, S. (2005). The Stressor-Emotion Model of Counterproductive Work Behaviour. In Counterproductive Work Behaviour: Investigations of Actors and Targets, Eds Fox S., Spector P. E., Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 151-174.
  • Spector, P. E., & Jex, S. M. (1998). Development of four self-report measures of job stressors and strain: Interpersonal Conflict at Work Scale, Organisational Constraints Scale, Quantitative Workload Inventory, and Physical Symptoms Inventory.
  • Thibaut, J. W., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates.
  • Wang, G., Jing, R., & Klossek, A. (2007). Antecedents and management of conflict: Resolution styles of Chinese top managers in multiple rounds of cognitive and affective conflict. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(1), 74-97.

Abstract Views: 231

PDF Views: 0




  • Organisational Justice, Experiencing Interpersonal Conflict and Employee Engagement: A Moderated Mediation Analysis

Abstract Views: 231  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Tisha Singh
Department of Commerce, University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India
Sonia Choudhary
University of Jammu, Jammu & Kashmir, India

Abstract


Interpersonal conflict in a workplace is related to increased employee turnover rates, reduced creativity, and employee disengagement. Present study intends to examine how organisational justice can be related to lesser interpersonal conflict, i.e., task conflict, relationship conflict, and increased employee engagement. Data for the present study have been collected from 650 employees working in multinational corporations located in Gurgaon. Data collected have been validated using confirmatory factor analyses and hypotheses have been tested through structure equation modelling. Further, reliability and validity of data were confirmed. PROCESS has been applied to examine moderated-mediation. Results reveal that interpersonal conflict and employee engagement are negatively related, organisational justice is related to lesser conflict, organisational justice is positively related to employee engagement, and organisational justice is indirectly related to employee engagement through interpersonal conflict, but only when organisational justice is weak. The present study contributes to the existing literature by exploring that organisational justice may not only prevent conflict, but also affect how employees react when subjected to conflict. This study has been restricted to multinational corporations and Indian context only, which can be extended to other sectors and countries. This study contributes to the literature on employee engagement and the Job-Demand-Resource Theory by highlighting the moderating role of organisational justice. Present study confirms that organisational justice contributes to maintaining low levels of conflict as well as high levels of employee engagement.

Keywords


Organisational Justice, Task Conflict, Relationship Conflict, Employee Engagement.

References