Journal of Entrepreneurship & Management

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Critical Success Factors of Tech-Based Disruptive Startup Ecosystem in Bangladesh


Affiliations
1 ULAB School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB), Dhaka, Bangladesh
2 Mind Mechanics [part of Build Better Bangladesh (B-cube) Foundation], Dhaka, Bangladesh
3 Shabab Murshid Development Foundation (SMDF), Dhaka, Bangladesh
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore the startup ecosystem values which critically underpin and formulate the success factors of the young tech-based disruptive startups, leading to the overall success and sustainability of the entrepreneurship ecosystem for urban youth governing the development of the country.

Background: Although Bangladesh has the potential for tech-based business opportunities, there are lots of challenges in its existing entrepreneurship ecosystem which is devoid of the right blend of values of the stakeholders. In the context of Isenberg (2012) model of entrepreneurship ecosystem, the interconnected domains, e.g., markets, finance, human capital, policy, culture, and education set their own values to scope out their own success through their respective roles and responsibilities in the ecosystem. The values for which these domains of entrepreneurship ecosystem coexist, and based on that the success narratives for which more and more tech-based disruptive startup entrepreneurs enter the ecosystem with new ideas and spirits, are critically and symbiotically bonded together for a matching scenario of overall success and sustainability of the entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Approach: We have designed the framework of our study based on the relevant value creation concept of Stam (2015) through entrepreneurial activities that depend upon overall entrepreneurship ecosystem and other relevant factors. Our approach for this study is inductive, followed by the grounded theory and theoretical sampling process. For this, we are underpinning the research with the Human-Centered Design (HCD) technique by taking into account the narratives of the various stakeholders of the startup ecosystem in Bangladesh including the tech-based disruptive startup entrepreneurs. This means that our research is qualitative, and done using both the primary and secondary sources, where we have applied laddering technique (n=10, l=30) and content analysis method (n=15), respectively, for data triangulation.

Findings: Through this research, it has been found out that, the personal values of the startup entrepreneurs are not only linked to the ventures that they have co-created, but are also driven by the startup stakeholder values prevailing in the startup ecosystem. This value-venture nexus constitutes the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of tech-based disruptive startup ecosystem in urban Bangladesh, and thus delinking the “value” from the “venture” is not the path of overall success of the ecosystem. In this context, “survival” connected to technology-centric innovations and revolutions, “optimism” connected to recognizing and working on the areas of passion, and “legacy” connected to contribution to the society – altogether define the CSFs. It should be made sure that this “value-venture” orientation is kept connected to ensure the sustainability of the tech-based disruptive startup ecosystem in Bangladesh.

Value: This research adds to the knowledge about the importance of “value-based entrepreneurs” that can lead towards the overall success of the ecosystem. It will contribute to a deeper degree of knowledge for stakeholders and policy makers in the development of supporting infrastructures and resources, both at public and private domains. If this is done holistically, it will ensure sustainable development of urban youth and the economy.

Funding note: This research has been conducted through the “EMK-Junction Entrepreneurship Research Fellowship” programme and has been funded by the American Edward M. Kennedy Center for Public Service and the Arts (www.emk.com.bd).

Keywords

Critical Success Factors, Disruptive Innovation, Entrepreneurship Ecosystem, Human-Centered Design, Laddering, Startups, Technology, Value-Based Entrepreneurship, Value-Venture.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abetti, P. A. (2000). Critical success factors for radical technological innovation: A five case study. Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(4), 208-221.

  • Assink, M. (2006). Inhibitors of disruptive innovation capability: A conceptual model. European Journal of Innovation Management, 9(2), 215-233.

  • Auerswald, P. E. (2015). Enabling entrepreneurial ecosystems: Insights from ecology to inform effective entrepreneurship policy. Kauffman Foundation Research Series on City, Metro, and Regional Entrepreneurship.

  • Bailetti, T. (2012). Technology entrepreneurship: Overview, definition, and distinctive aspects. Technology Innovation Management Review, 2(2), 5.

  • Cable, D. M., & Shane, S. (1997). A prisoner’s dilemma approach to entrepreneur-venture capitalist relationships. Academy of Management Review, 22(1), 142-176.

  • Collins, P. K. (2015). Building a local design and entrepreneurship ecosystem. Procedia Technology, 20, 258-262.

  • Christensen, C. M., Baumann, H., Ruggles, R., & Sadtler, T. M. (2006). Disruptive innovation for social change. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 94.

  • Christensen, C. M., Raynor, M. E., & McDonald, R. (2015). What is disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 44-53.

  • Entezari, Y. (2015). Building knowledge-based entrepreneurship ecosystems: Case of Iran. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 195, 1206-1215.

  • Fernandez Fernandez, M. T., Blanco Jiménez, F. J., & Cuadrado Roura, J. R. (2015). Business incubation: Innovative services in an entrepreneurship ecosystem. The Service Industries Journal, 35(14), 783-800.

  • Fontana, A., & Frey, J.H. (2005). The interview: From neutral stance to political involvment. In Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 695-728.

  • Fuerlinger, G., Fandl, U., & Funke, T. (2015). The role of the state in the entrepreneurship ecosystem: Insights from Germany. Triple Helix, 2(1), 3.

  • Future Start-up (FS). (2017). Facebook Rules the Internet in Bangladesh and Many Users Don’t Know That They are Using the Internet.

  • Ingenbleek, P., Debruyne, M., Frambach, R. T., & Verhallen, T. M. M. (2013). Conducting field research in subsistence markets, with an application to market orientation in the context of Ethiopian pastoralists. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 30(1), 83-97.

  • Isenberg, D. J. (2016). Applying the ecosystem metaphor to entrepreneurship: Uses and abuses. The Antitrust Bulletin, 61(4), 564-573.

  • Isenberg, D. (2012). Introducing the Babson entrepreneurship ecosystem project. Fostering high growth entrepreneurship ecosystems around the world (Power Point, disponible). Retrieved from http://www.grcc.com/App_Content/media/user_files/InterCity_Visit/2012/Presentations/LenSchlesinger_EcoSystem.pdf

  • Johnson, J. E. (2004). Factors influencing the early internationalization of high technology start-ups: US and UK evidence. Journal of international Entrepreneurship, 2(1), 139-154.

  • Kolko, J. (2015). Design thinking comes of age. Harvard Business Review, 93(9), 66-71.

  • Lee, S. H., M. W. Peng, et al. (2013). Governments, entrepreneurs, and positive externalities: A real options perspective. European Management Journal, 31(4), 333-347.

  • Malik, R., & Bing, X. (2016). Disrupting the Disruptors. EY and the G20 Young Entrepreneurs’ Alliance, Beijing

  • Malhi, R. S. (2009). The hard truth about graduate employability and soft skills. ADEPT: Higher Education Leadership Research Bulletin, 3, 45-56.

  • Murphy, S. (2010). Corporate partnerships for entrepreneurship: Building the ecosystem in the Middle East and Southeast Asia. Corporate Social Responsibility Initiative Working Paper, 62.

  • Nambisan, S., & Baron, R. A. (2013). Entrepreneurship in innovation ecosystems: entrepreneurs’ self‐regulatory processes and their implications for new venture success. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 37(5), 1071-1097.

  • Ntseane, P. (2004). Being a female entrepreneur in Botswana: cultures, values, strategies for success. Gender & Development, 12(2), 37-43.

  • Prahalad, C. K. and S. L. Hart (2002). The fortune at the bottom of the pyramid. Strategy and Business 26 (first quarter 2002), 1-14.

  • Pilinkiene, V., & Maciulis, P. (2014). Comparison of different ecosystem analogies: The main economic determinants and levels of impact. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 156, 365-370.

  • Puri, M., & Robinson, D. T. (2013). The economic psychology of entrepreneurship and family business. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 22(2), 423-444.

  • Rahatullah Khan, M. (2013). Mapping entrepreneurship ecosystem of Saudi Arabia. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 9(1), 28-54.

  • Roure, J. B., & Maidique, M. A. (1986). Linking prefunding factors and high-technology venture success: An exploratory study. Journal of Business Venturing, 1(3), 295-306.

  • Sandstrom, C., Berglund, H., & Magnusson, M. (2014). Symmetric assumptions in the theory of disruptive innovation: Theoretical and managerial implications. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(4), 472-483.

  • Sebora, T. C., Lee, S. M., & Sukasame, N. (2009). Critical success factors for e-commerce entrepreneurship: An empirical study of Thailand. Small Business Economics, 32(3), 303-316.

  • Stam, E. (2015). Entrepreneurial ecosystems and regional policy: A sympathetic critique. European Planning Studies, 23(9), 1759-1769.

  • van Huijgevoort, T. (2012). The ‘business accelerator’: Just a different name for a business incubator. Bachelor Thesis, Utrecht School of Economics, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

  • Telegraph. (2015). Start-up culture is corrupting our youth and killing real entrepreneurship. Accessed on 08 February 2017.

  • Tufts University. (2017). Digital Planet 2017 Report. The Fletcher School.

  • Viswanathan, M., & Rosa, J. A. (2010). Understanding subsistence marketplaces: Toward sustainable consumption and commerce for a better world. Journal of Business Research, 63(special issue), 535–537.

  • Wessel, M. (2016). How big data is changing disruptive innovation. Harvard Business Review, 27.

  • Yu, D., & Hang, C. C. (2010). A reflective review of disruptive innovation theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(4), 435-452.


Abstract Views: 343

PDF Views: 1




  • Critical Success Factors of Tech-Based Disruptive Startup Ecosystem in Bangladesh

Abstract Views: 343  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Iftekhar Ul Karim
ULAB School of Business, University of Liberal Arts Bangladesh (ULAB), Dhaka, Bangladesh
Imran Newaz Khurshid
Mind Mechanics [part of Build Better Bangladesh (B-cube) Foundation], Dhaka, Bangladesh
Sadia Naureen Huq
Shabab Murshid Development Foundation (SMDF), Dhaka, Bangladesh

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this paper is to explore the startup ecosystem values which critically underpin and formulate the success factors of the young tech-based disruptive startups, leading to the overall success and sustainability of the entrepreneurship ecosystem for urban youth governing the development of the country.

Background: Although Bangladesh has the potential for tech-based business opportunities, there are lots of challenges in its existing entrepreneurship ecosystem which is devoid of the right blend of values of the stakeholders. In the context of Isenberg (2012) model of entrepreneurship ecosystem, the interconnected domains, e.g., markets, finance, human capital, policy, culture, and education set their own values to scope out their own success through their respective roles and responsibilities in the ecosystem. The values for which these domains of entrepreneurship ecosystem coexist, and based on that the success narratives for which more and more tech-based disruptive startup entrepreneurs enter the ecosystem with new ideas and spirits, are critically and symbiotically bonded together for a matching scenario of overall success and sustainability of the entrepreneurship ecosystem.

Approach: We have designed the framework of our study based on the relevant value creation concept of Stam (2015) through entrepreneurial activities that depend upon overall entrepreneurship ecosystem and other relevant factors. Our approach for this study is inductive, followed by the grounded theory and theoretical sampling process. For this, we are underpinning the research with the Human-Centered Design (HCD) technique by taking into account the narratives of the various stakeholders of the startup ecosystem in Bangladesh including the tech-based disruptive startup entrepreneurs. This means that our research is qualitative, and done using both the primary and secondary sources, where we have applied laddering technique (n=10, l=30) and content analysis method (n=15), respectively, for data triangulation.

Findings: Through this research, it has been found out that, the personal values of the startup entrepreneurs are not only linked to the ventures that they have co-created, but are also driven by the startup stakeholder values prevailing in the startup ecosystem. This value-venture nexus constitutes the Critical Success Factors (CSFs) of tech-based disruptive startup ecosystem in urban Bangladesh, and thus delinking the “value” from the “venture” is not the path of overall success of the ecosystem. In this context, “survival” connected to technology-centric innovations and revolutions, “optimism” connected to recognizing and working on the areas of passion, and “legacy” connected to contribution to the society – altogether define the CSFs. It should be made sure that this “value-venture” orientation is kept connected to ensure the sustainability of the tech-based disruptive startup ecosystem in Bangladesh.

Value: This research adds to the knowledge about the importance of “value-based entrepreneurs” that can lead towards the overall success of the ecosystem. It will contribute to a deeper degree of knowledge for stakeholders and policy makers in the development of supporting infrastructures and resources, both at public and private domains. If this is done holistically, it will ensure sustainable development of urban youth and the economy.

Funding note: This research has been conducted through the “EMK-Junction Entrepreneurship Research Fellowship” programme and has been funded by the American Edward M. Kennedy Center for Public Service and the Arts (www.emk.com.bd).

Keywords


Critical Success Factors, Disruptive Innovation, Entrepreneurship Ecosystem, Human-Centered Design, Laddering, Startups, Technology, Value-Based Entrepreneurship, Value-Venture.

References