Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Success Factors of Entrepreneurial Teams:Modeling Through the Cognitive Mapping


Affiliations
1 Department of Economic Sciences, Laboratory URECA, University of Sfax, Street of Airport, Tunisia
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Little research in entrepreneurship has sought to determine what factors can lead to entrepreneurial team venture success. The present study examined the role of resources such as human capital, social capital, and financial capital and how team processes influenced entrepreneurial team success. Findings from survey data of 80 entrepreneurial teams show that these resources and team dynamics were key factors of entrepreneurial team success. We enrich the entrepreneurial literature by introducing cognitive map as a new technique to measure entrepreneurial team success. Using this technique, we provide a methodological contribution to develop and analyse the cognitive map which reflects collective thinking of entrepreneurs about the factors of their success.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Team, Key Success Factors, Cognitive Map, Entrepreneurial Success.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Amit, R., Mac Crimmon, K., Zietsman, C., & Oesch, J. (2000). Does money matter? Wealth attainment as the motive for initiating growth-oriented technology ventures. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(2), 119-143. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00044-0
  • Audretsch, D., & Lehmann, E. (2004). Financing hightech growth: The role of banks and venture capitalists. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 340-357.
  • Bhagavatula, S., Elfring, T., Tilburg, A., & Van de Bunt, G. G. (2010). How social and human capital influence opportunity recognition and resource mobilization in India’s handloom industry. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 245-260.
  • Birley, S. (1985). The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 1, 107 -117.
  • Cohen, S. G., & Bailey, D. (1997). What makes teams work: Group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite. Journal of Management, 23(3), 239-290.
  • Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2005). Founders’ human capital and the growth of new technology-based firms: A competence-based view. Research Policy, 34(6), 795-816.
  • Cooper, A. C., & Bruno, A. (1977). Success among high-technology firms. Business Horizons, 20, 16-22.
  • Cooper, A. C., & Daily C. M. (1997). Entrepreneurial Teams, In Sexton D. L. et Smilor R. W. (Ed.), Entrepreneurship 2000, (pp. 127-150).
  • Daily, C., McDougall, P., Covin, J., & Dalton, D. (2002). Governance and Strategic Leadership in Entrepreneurial Firms. Journal of Management, 28(3), 387-412.
  • Elfring, T., & Hulsink, W. (2003). Networks in entrepreneurship the case of high-technology firms. Small Business Economics, 21, 409-422.
  • Engel, D., & Keilbach, M. (2007). Firm-level implications of early stage venture capital investment an empirical investigation. Journal of Empirical Finance Elsevier, 14(2), 150-167.
  • Ensley, M. D., Pearson, A. W., & Amason, A. C. (2002). Understanding the dynamics of new venture top management teams: Cohesion, conflict, and new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(14), 365-386.
  • Florin, J., Lubatkin, M., & Schulze, W. (2003). A social capital model of high growth ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 374-384.
  • Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193-206.
  • Hannu, L. (2000). Networks and local environmental characteristics in the survival of new firms. Small Business Economics, 15, 59-71.
  • Hansen, E. L. (1991). Structure and process in entrepreneurial networks as partial determinants of initial new venture growth, In N. Churchill, W. B bygrave, J. Covin, D. Sexton, D. Slevin, K. Vesper, and W. Wetzel, Jr. (Ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (pp.320-334), Wellesley, MA: Babson College Center for Entrepreneurial Studies.
  • Henttonen, K. (2010). Exploring social networks on the team level: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 27, 74-109.
  • Hofer, C. W., & Sandberg, W. R. (1987). Improving new venture performance: some guidelines for success. American Journal of Small Business, 12(1), 11-25.
  • Huang, H.-C., Lei, M.-C., & Lo, K.-W. (2012). Do founders’ own resources matter? The influence of business networks on start-up innovation and performance. Technovation. doi: 10.1016/j.technovation.2011.12.004.
  • Kamm, J. B., Shuman, J. C., Seeger, J. A., & Nurick, A. J. (1990). Entrepreneurial teams in new venture creation: A research agenda. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 14(40), 7-17.
  • Katz, N., Lazer, D., Arrow, H., & Contractor, N. (2004). Network theory and small groups. Small Group Research, 35(3), 307-332.
  • Kessler, A. (2007). Success factors for new businesses in Austria and the Czech Republic; entrepreneurship & regional development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development.
  • Kinias, I. G. (2013). The importance of the entrepreneurial background in the detection and the utilization of the information. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 73, 564-572.
  • Lasch, F., Lee Roy, F., & Yami, S. (2005). Les déterminants de la survie et de la croissance des start-up TIC. Revue française de gestion, 2(155), 37-56.
  • Lechler, T. (2001). Social interaction: A determinant of entrepreneurial team venture success. Small Business Economics, 16, 263-278.
  • Lin, C. P. (2011). Modeling job effectiveness and its antecedents from a social capital perspective: A survey of virtual teams within business organizations. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 915-923.
  • Lin, H.-C., & Rabbah, N. (2014). CEO-TMT exchange, TMT personality composition, and decision quality: The mediating role of TMT psychological empowerment. The Leadership Quarterly, 25, 943-957.
  • Marks, M. A., Mathieu, J. E., & Zaccaro, S. J. (2001). A temporally based framework and taxonomy of team processes. Academy of Management Review, 26, 356-376.
  • Mehra, A., Dixon, A. L., Brass, D. J., & Robertson, B. (2006). The social network ties of group leaders: Implications for group performance and leadership reputation. Organization Science, 17, 64-79.
  • Packalen, K. A. (2007). Complementing capital: The role of status, demographic features, and social capital in founding teams’ abilities to obtain resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 31(6), 873-891.
  • Perez, E., & Canino, R. (2009). The importance of entrepreneur’s perception of success. Review of International Comparative Management, 10(5), 990-1010.
  • Rogoff, E. R., Lee, M. S., & Suh, D. C. (2004). Who done it? Attributions by entrepreneurs experts of the factors that cause and impede small business success. Journal of Small Business Management, 42, 346-376.
  • Shane, S., & Venkataraman, S. (2000). The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Academy of Management Review, 25, 217-226.
  • Singh, S., Corner, P., & Pavlovich, K. (2007). Coping with entrepreneurial failure. Journal of Management &Organization, 13, 331-334.
  • Talaulicar, T., Grundei, J., & Werder, A. V. (2005). Strategic decision making in start-ups: The effect of top management team organization and processes on speed and comprehensiveness. Journal of Business Venturing, 20, 519-541.
  • Taormina, J., & Lao, S. K. M. (2007). Measuring Chinese entrepreneurial motivation: Personality and environmental influences. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 13(4), 200-221. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552550710759997
  • Unger, J. M., Rauch, A., Freese, M., & Rosenbusch, N. (2011). Human capital and entrepreneurial success: A meta-analytical review. Journal of Business Venturing, 26, 341-358.
  • Vesper, K. H. (1990). New venture strategies. Revised Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
  • Vyakarnam, S., Jacobs, R. C., & Handelberg, J. (1997). Formation and Development of Entrepreneurial Teams in Rapid Growth Businesses, Working Paper.
  • Watson, K., Hogarth-Scott, S., & Wilson, N. (1998). Small business start-ups: Success factors and support implication. Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior and Research, 4(3), 217-238. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13552559810235510
  • Watson, W. E., Ponthieu, L. D., & Critelli, J. W. (1995). Team interpersonal process effectiveness in venture partnerships and its connection to perceived success. Journal of Business Venturing, 10, 393-411.

Abstract Views: 399

PDF Views: 0




  • Success Factors of Entrepreneurial Teams:Modeling Through the Cognitive Mapping

Abstract Views: 399  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Ahlem Omri
Department of Economic Sciences, Laboratory URECA, University of Sfax, Street of Airport, Tunisia
Younes Boujelbene
Department of Economic Sciences, Laboratory URECA, University of Sfax, Street of Airport, Tunisia

Abstract


Little research in entrepreneurship has sought to determine what factors can lead to entrepreneurial team venture success. The present study examined the role of resources such as human capital, social capital, and financial capital and how team processes influenced entrepreneurial team success. Findings from survey data of 80 entrepreneurial teams show that these resources and team dynamics were key factors of entrepreneurial team success. We enrich the entrepreneurial literature by introducing cognitive map as a new technique to measure entrepreneurial team success. Using this technique, we provide a methodological contribution to develop and analyse the cognitive map which reflects collective thinking of entrepreneurs about the factors of their success.

Keywords


Entrepreneurial Team, Key Success Factors, Cognitive Map, Entrepreneurial Success.

References