Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Awasthi, H. K.
- Study of Factors Influencing Adoption of Educational Technology in Teaching-Learning Process in Agricultural Universities in India
Abstract Views :177 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, IN
1 ICAR-National Academy of Agricultural Research Management, Hyderabad, IN
Source
International Journal of Education and Management Studies, Vol 9, No 3 (2019), Pagination: 164-168Abstract
Educational Technology (ET) is the use ofboth physical hardware and educational theories. ET has an important role to enhance relationships between teachers and students to provide quality education in an academic institution ecosystem. ET has become both a network of gathering and sharing ideas, and also a platform for research, collaborate, and differentiate in teaching-learning process. Considering the importance of ET in the education system, a study on factors influencing the use of ET in teaching-learning process in agricultural universities is undertaken at two representative Agricultural Universities AUs from North (denoted as A) and South (denoted as B) part of India, covering 60 teachers and 120 students as respondents ofthe study. Study revealed that the majority of the teachers and students had medium level of use of ET for teaching purpose. Binary logistic regression analysis revealed that the information seeking behaviour, attitude towards ET and awareness towards ET were positively and significantly associated with teacher's adoption of ET in teaching, where as training needs and mass media exposure were positively and significantly and infrastructure was negatively associated with student's adoption of ET for learning purpose.Keywords
Educational Technology, Extent of Adoption, Teaching-Learning Process, Teachers, Students.
References
- Baturay, M.H. (2015). An overview of the world of MOOCs. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 174,427-433.
- Brugger, N. (2015). A briefhistory of Facebook as a media text: The development of an empty structure. First Monday, 20(5), D01http://dx.doi.org/10.5210/fm.v20i5.54 23.
- Duncan, A. (2013). Education: The most powerful weaponfor changing the -world. USAID, America.
- Farrow, R., Perryman, L.A., de los Arcos, B., Weller, M., & Pitt, R. (2016). OER Hub Researcher Pack. OER.
- Ganguli, D. (2006). Use of educational technology in teaching of veterinary science and related constraints. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 6(3). http://seea.org.in/vol6-2-3-2006/14.pdf.
- Gilakjani, A. P., Lai-Mei, L., & Ismail, H. N. (2013). Teachers' use of technology and constructivism. International Journal of Modern Education and Computer Science, 5(4), 49.
- Issroff, K., & Scanlon, E. (2002). Educational technology: The influence of theory. Journal oflnteractiveMedia in Education, 22,62-67.
- Janarthanan, R , & Kumar, M. S. (2018). A study on Internet usage by the postgraduate students of Tamil Nadu Agriculture University. Compendium of abstracts Coimbatore: International Conference on Invigorating Transformation of Farm Extension towards Sustainable development: Futuristic Challenge and Prospects, T04, 0-726-327.
- Kellogg, S. (2013). Online learning how to make a MOOCs. International Weekly Journal of Science, 499, 369-371.
- Lakshmi,K. B., &Babu, K. M. (2018). Extent of utilization of social media by extension functionaries in Southern India. Indian Research Journal of Extension Education, 18(3), 90-92.
- Malik, S., & Agarwal, A. (2012). Use of multimedia as a new educational technology tool: A study. International Journal ofInformation and Education ’Technology, 2(5), 468-471
- Martins, C.B., Steil, A.V., & Todesco, J.L. (2004). Factors influencing the adoption of the Internet as a teaching tool at foreign language schools. Computers and Education, 42(4), 353-374.
- Mason, R (2006). Learning technologies for adult continuing education. Studies in Continuing Education, 28(2), 121-133.
- Mazman, S.G., & Usluel, Y.K. (2010). Modeling educational usage of Facebook. Computers and Education, 55(2), 444-453.
- Pandey, D. K., De, H. K., & Upadhayay A. D. (2017). Usage of ICAR e-leaming portal among students of North East India: A pilot study. Indian Journal of Extesnion Education, 53(2), 85-88.
- Paskevicius, M. (2012). Introduction to Open Educational Resources (OER). https://joumals.sagepub.com > doi > full
- Santrock, J.W. (2006) Educational Psychology. Classroom update: Preparing for PRAXIS and practice. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
- Sitachew, M., Mansingh, J.P., & Debela, M. (2018). Determinanats of rural women's participation in agricultural extension services: Case oflrrigable Vegetable Production in OromiaRegion, Ethopia. .JournalofExtensionEducation, 30(3), 6092-6099.
- Snelson, C., & Perkins, R.A., (2009). From silent film to You Tube™: Tracing the historical ischolar_mains of motion picture technologies in education. Journal of Visual Literacy, 28(),-21.
- Wankhade, P.P. et al. (2017). Use of information communication technology in the post graduate students. Indian Research Journal ofExtension Education, 14(2), 78-80.
- Woreta, S. A., Kebede, Y., & Zegeye, D. T. (2013). Knowledge and utilization of information communication technology (ICT) among health science students at the university of Gondar, North Western Ethiopia. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 73(1), 31.
- Zaranis, N., Oikonomidis, V., & Linardakis, M. (2017). Factors affecting Greek kindergarten teachers to support or oppose ICT in education. In P. Anastasiades and N. Zaranis (Eds.), Research in e-Leaming and ICT in education: Technological, pedagogical and instructional perspectives (pp. 203-216). New York: Springer Science andBusiness.
- Zillien, N., & Hargittai, E. (2009). Digital distinction: Status-specific types of internet usage. Social Science Quarterly, 90(2), 274-291.
- Zhen, Y., Garthwait, A., & Pratt, P. (2008). Factors affecting faculty members' decision to teach or not to teach online in higher education. Online Journal of Distance Learning Administration, H(3), 18.