Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Social Class and Patterns of Parent-Adolescent Interactions:A Case Study of GBPUAT, Pantnagar


Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies Collage of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, Uttrakhand, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study investigated parent-adolescent interaction in families from four different social classes (Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV) of G.B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. Families falling under social class I of the university had parent(s) working as Professor and Associate Professor in the university; those falling under social class II had parent(s) working as Assistant Professor or equivalent and Doctor in the university; those falling under social class III had parent(s) working as Accountant, Supervisor, Lab Technician and Clerk in the university and those falling under social class IV had parent(s) working as Attendant, Driver, Peon, CRC laborer, Gardner and Sweeper. Forty adolescents were randomly selected as respondents from each social class of families making a total of 160 adolescent respondents for the present study.Parent-adolescent interaction was assessed through adolescents' perception on it using standardized PCR scale. In the present study it was seen that adolescents from social class I and social class II perceived their parents, both mothers and fathers to be significantly more protecting; demanding; symbolically punitive; symbolic and object reward giving than those from social class III and social class IV On the contrary, adolescents from social class III and social class IV reported their parents, both mothers and fathers to be significantly more rejecting, practicing object punishment, neglecting and indifferent than those belonging to social class I and social class II. Hence, higher the social class of a family, higher or better is the education and economic level of the parents and thereby significantly better is the parent-adolescent interaction.

Keywords

Demanding, Object Reward, Protecting, Symbolically Punishing.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Afifi, T. D., Granger, D. A., Denes, A., Joseph, A., & Aldeis, D. (2011). Parents communication skills and adolescents salivary cc-amylase and cortisol response patterns. Communication Monographs, 78, 273-295.
  • Bluestone, C, & Tamis-LeMonda, C.S. (1999). Correlates of parenting styles in predominantly working- and middle-class African American mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 61, 881-893.
  • Bradley, R. H., & Corwyn, R. F. (2002). Socioeconomic status and child development. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 371-399.
  • Bureau, J.S., & Mageau, G.A. (2014). Parental autonomy support and honesty: The mediating role of identification with the honesty value and perceived costs and benefits of honesty. Journal of Adolescent, 37, 225-361.
  • Conger, R.D., Ge, X., Elder, Jr.G.FL, Lorenz, F.O., & Simons, R.L. (1994). Economic stress, coercive family process, and developmental problems of adolescents. Child Development, 65, 541-561.
  • Dixson, D. D., Keltner, D., Worrell, F. C, & Mello, Z. (2017). The magic of hope: Hope mediates the relationship between socioeconomic status and academic achievement. Journal of Educational Research, 111(4), 507-515.
  • Duncan, G. J., Brooks-Gunn, J., & Klebanov, P. K. (1994). Economic deprivation and early-childhood development. Child Development, 65, 296-318.
  • Duncan, G.J., Ziol-Guest, K.M., & Kalil, A. (2010). Family childhood poverty and adult attainment behaviour, andhealth. Child Development, 81, 306-395.
  • Gouc, G. (2007). The mechanisms medicating the effects of poverty on children' intellectual development. Demography, 37, A'iX-AAl.
  • Grimm-Thomas, K., & Perry-Jenkins, M. (1994). All in a day's work: Job experiences. self-esteem, and fathering in working-class families. Family Relations, 43,174-181.
  • Holman, A., Abetz, J., Kellas, J. K., & Vagnoni, E. (2015). Giving voice to the silence of family estrangement: Comparing reasons of estranged parents and adult children in a Nonmatched sample. Journal of Family Communication, 15, 130-140.
  • Joseph, T. (2012). A comparative study to assess the emotional problems among adolescent girls of working mothers and non-working mothers in a selected school in Mangalore. M.Sc, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Bangalore. Karnataka.
  • Kraus, M. W., Piff, P. K., Mendoza-Denton, R., Rheinschmidt, M. L., & Keltner, D. (2012). Social class, solipsism, and contextualism: How the rich are different from the poor. Psychological Review, 119, 546-572.
  • McLoyd, V.C. (1990). The impact of economic hardship on black families and children: Psychological distress, parenting, and socio-emotional development. Child Development, 61, 311-346.
  • Mganga, B. C, & Mizambwa, E. (1997). Parents involvement in primary education in Tanzania. A Case Study of Morogoro Municipality. Unpublished M.Ed. Thesis. Morogoro: Abo Akademi University.
  • Paikoff, R. L., & Brooksgunn, J. (1991). Do parent child relationships change during puberty. PsychologicalBulletin, 110, 47-66.
  • Rosier, K.B., & Corsaro, W.A. (1993). Competent parents, complex lives: Managing parenthood in poverty. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22, 171-204.
  • Smetana, J. G., Crean, H. F., & Daddis, C. (2002). Family processes and problem behaviors in middle-class African American adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 12, 275-304.
  • Stattin, H, & Kerr, M. (2000). Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development, 71, 1072-1085.

Abstract Views: 234

PDF Views: 0




  • Social Class and Patterns of Parent-Adolescent Interactions:A Case Study of GBPUAT, Pantnagar

Abstract Views: 234  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Arti Kumari
Department of Human Development and Family Studies Collage of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, Uttrakhand, India
Ritu Singh
Department of Human Development and Family Studies Collage of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, Uttrakhand, India
Manisha Mehra
Department of Human Development and Family Studies Collage of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, Uttrakhand, India
Amit Kr. Mishra
Department of Human Development and Family Studies Collage of Home Science, G.B.P.U.A. & T., Pantnagar, Uttrakhand, India

Abstract


The present study investigated parent-adolescent interaction in families from four different social classes (Class I, Class II, Class III, and Class IV) of G.B Pant University of Agriculture and Technology, Pantnagar, Uttarakhand. Families falling under social class I of the university had parent(s) working as Professor and Associate Professor in the university; those falling under social class II had parent(s) working as Assistant Professor or equivalent and Doctor in the university; those falling under social class III had parent(s) working as Accountant, Supervisor, Lab Technician and Clerk in the university and those falling under social class IV had parent(s) working as Attendant, Driver, Peon, CRC laborer, Gardner and Sweeper. Forty adolescents were randomly selected as respondents from each social class of families making a total of 160 adolescent respondents for the present study.Parent-adolescent interaction was assessed through adolescents' perception on it using standardized PCR scale. In the present study it was seen that adolescents from social class I and social class II perceived their parents, both mothers and fathers to be significantly more protecting; demanding; symbolically punitive; symbolic and object reward giving than those from social class III and social class IV On the contrary, adolescents from social class III and social class IV reported their parents, both mothers and fathers to be significantly more rejecting, practicing object punishment, neglecting and indifferent than those belonging to social class I and social class II. Hence, higher the social class of a family, higher or better is the education and economic level of the parents and thereby significantly better is the parent-adolescent interaction.

Keywords


Demanding, Object Reward, Protecting, Symbolically Punishing.

References