Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Influence of Family Environment and Work Values on Vocational Preference Across Career Stages in Young Adults


Affiliations
1 Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
2 Department of Psychology, Sri Aurobindo College, New Delhi, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Career choice has the potential to influence the social mobility, economic security, employment opportunity, emotional well being and quality of life of an individual and his/her family. The process of choosing a career is a developmental task that comes as a challenge to both the child and the parent. As the child progresses across the career stages, decisions of persistence and shift are also made. The present research aimed to study the role of family environment and work values in determining the vocational preference and work values across career stages. The participants included children freshly enrolled in college, those who had been working for less than 2 years after post graduation and those working for less than 10 years, the sample size being 120. The measures used in the study were General Health Questionnaire-12, Family Environment Scale, Vocational Preference Inventory and Values Scale. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the variables. The study has clinical implications for emphasising the importance of making a more planned career decision and evaluating various aspects in career stream persistence or transition.

Keywords

Family Environment, Values, Career.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Agarwala, T. (2008). Factors influencing career choice of management students in India. Career Development International, 13(4), 362-376.
  • Arnett, J. J. (2012). New horizons in research on emerging and young adulthood. In A. Booth, S. L. Brown, N. S. Landale, W. D. Manning, and S. M. McHale (Eds.), Early adulthood in a family context (pp. 231-244). Springer New York.
  • Arnold, J. (1997). Managing careers into the 21st century. London: Paul Chapman.
  • Arthur, M. B., Claman, P. H, & DeFillippi, R J. (1995). Intelligent enterprise, intelligent careers. The Academy of Management Executive, 9(4), 7-20.
  • Arthur, M. B., Hall, D. T, & Lawrence, B. S. (Eds.) (1989). Handbook of career theory. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bhandari, N. C. (2006). Intention for entrepreneurship among students in India. The Journal of Entrepreneurship, 15(2), 169-179.
  • Bloch, D. P., & Richmond, L. J. (2007). Soul work: Finding the work you love, loving the work you have (Rev. ed.). Queensland, Australia: eContent Management.
  • Briscoe, J. P., Hall, D. T, & DeMuth, R. L. F (2006). Protean and boundaryless careers: An empirical exploration. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 30-47.
  • Brockner, J., Higgins, E. T, & Low, M. B. (2004). Regulatory focus theory and the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 203-220.
  • Bryant, B. K., Zvonkovic, A. M., & Reynolds, P. (2006). Parenting in relation to child and adolescent vocational development. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(1), 149-175.
  • Cennamo, L., & Gardner, D. (2008). Generational differences in work values, outcomes and person-organisation values fit. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 23(8), 891-906.
  • Chatterjee, S. R., & Pearson, C. A. (2000). Indian managers in transition: Orientations, work goals, values and ethics. MIR:Management International Review,40(1), 81-95.
  • Chope, R C. (2008). Practice and research in career counseling and development 2007. The Career DeveIopment QuarterIy,57(2),98-73.
  • Chudzikowski, K. (2012). Career transitions and career success in the new career era. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 81(2), 298-306.
  • Crant, J. M. (1996). The proactive personality scale as a predictor of entrepreneurial intentions. Joumal of Small Business Management,34(3), 42.
  • Dik, B. J., & Duffy, R. D. (2009). Calling and vocation at work: Definitions and prospects for research and practice. The Counseling Psychologist,37(3), 424-450.
  • Dik, B. J., Sargent, A. M., & Steger, M. F (2008). Career development strivings: Assessing goals and motivation in career decision-making and planning. Journal of Career Development, 35(1), 23-41.
  • Dobrow, S. R., & Tosti-Kharas, J. (2011). Calling: The development of a scale measure. Personnel Psychology, 64(4), 1001-1049.
  • Duffy, R D., & Dik, B. J. (2013). Research on calling: What have we learned and where are we going? Journal of Vocational Behavior,83(3), 428-436.
  • Duffy, R. D., & Sedlacek, W. E. (2007). The presence of and search for a calling: Connections to career development. Journal of Vocational Behavior,70(3),590-601.
  • Elangovan, A. R, Pinder, C. C, & McLean, M. (2010). Callings and organizational behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 76(3), 428-440.
  • Feldman, D. C, & Ng, T. W. (2007). Careers: Mobility, embeddedness, and success. Journal of Management, 33(3), 350-377.
  • Goldenberg, H., & Goldenberg, I. (2012). Family therapy: An overview. Cengage Learning.
  • Hall, D. T, & Chandler, D. E. (2005). Psychological success: When the career is a calling. Journal of organizational behavior,26(2), 155-176.
  • Hargrove, B. K., Inman, A. G, & Crane, R. L. (2005). Family interaction patterns, career planning attitudes, and vocational identity of high school adolescents. Journal of Career Development, 31(4), 263-278.
  • Higgins, E. T. (2005). Value from regulatory fit. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(4), 209-213.
  • Holland, J. L. (1959). Atheory of vocational choice. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6(1),35.
  • Hunter, C. (2016). Exploring career change through the lens of the intelligent career framework School of Management. PhD.
  • Inkson, K., & Elkin, G. (2008). Landscape with travellers: The context of careers in developed nations. In K. Inkson, V. Browning, and J. Kirkwood (Eds.), International handbook of career guidance. (pp. 69-94). Springer Netherlands.
  • Jaskiewicz, P., Luchak, A. A., Oh, I. S., & Chlosta, S. (2016). Paid employee or entrepreneur? How approach and avoidance career goal orientations motivate individual career choice decisions. Journal of Career Development, 43(4), 349-367.
  • Johnson, P., Buboltz, W. C, & Nichols, C. N. (1999). Parental divorce, family functioning, and vocational identity of college students. Journal of Career Development,26(2), 137-146.
  • Knight, W. E., & Arnold, W. (2000, May). Towards a comprehensive predictive model of time to bachelor degree attainment. In O.H. Cincinnati (Ed), Annual forum of the Association for Institutional Research (pp. 133-156).
  • Kohn, M. L., & Schooler, C. (1983). Work and personality: An inquiry into the impact of social stratification. Ablex Pub.
  • Krumboltz, J. D. (1979). The effect of alternative career decision-making strategies on the quality of resulting decisions. Final Report.
  • Lau, A., & Pang, M. (2000). Career strategies to strengthen graduate employees' employment position in the Hong Kong labour market. Education Training, 42(3), 135-149.
  • Lent, R W., Brown, S. D., & Hackett, G. (1994). Toward a unifying social cognitive theory of career and academic interest, choice, and performance. Journal of Vocational Behavior,45(1),19-22.
  • Lyons, S. T, Higgins, C. A., & Duxbury,L. (2010). Work values: Development of anew three-dimensional structure based on confirmatory smallest space analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(7), 969-1002.
  • Lofquist, L. H, & Dawis, R. V. (1969). Adjustment to work: A psychological view of man problems in a work-oriented society. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Mainiero, L. A., & Sullivan, S. E. (2006). The Opt Out Revolt: Whe People are leaving Companies to Create Kaleidoscope Careers. Davies-Black Publishing.
  • Nicholson, A., & Cushman, L. (2000). Developing successful employees: Perceptions of industry leaders and academicians.EducationTraining,42(6), 366-371.
  • Praskova, A., Hood, M., & Creed, P. A. (2014). Testing a calling model of psychological career success in Australian young adults: A longitudinal study. Journal of Vocational Behavior,85(1),125-135.
  • Reason, R. D. (2009). An examination of persistence research through the lens of a comprehensive conceptual framework. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 659-682.
  • Riordan, C. M., Griffith, R. W., & Weatherly, E. W. (2003). Age and work-related outcomes: The moderating effects of status characteristics. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(1),37-57.
  • Roe,A. (1956). The psychology of occupations. New York: Wiley
  • Saha, A. (1992). Basic human nature in Indian tradition and its economic consequences. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 12(1-2), 1-50.
  • Schulenberg, J. E., Vondracek, F. W., & Crouter, A. C. (1984). The influence of the family on vocational development. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 46, 129-143.
  • Sinha, J. B., & Kanungo, R. N. (1997). Context sensitivity and balancing in Indian organizational behaviour. International Journal of Psychology, 32(2), 93-105.
  • Sortheix, F. M., Dietrich, J., Chow, A., & Salmela-Aro, K. (2013). The role of career values for work engagement during the transition to working life. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 83(3), 466-475.
  • Steger, M. F, Pickering, N. K., Shin, J. Y., & Dik, B. J. (2010). Calling in work: Secular or sacred? Journal of Career Assessment, 18(1), 82-96.
  • Stewart, J., & Knowles, V. (1999). The changing nature of graduate careers. Career Development International, 4(1), 370-383.
  • Sullivan, S. E., & Baruch, Y (2009). Advances in career theory and research: A critical review and agenda for future exploration. Journal of Management, 35(6), 1542-1571.
  • Super, D. E. (1953). A theory of vocational development. American Psychologist, 8(5), 185.
  • Super, D. E. (1976). Career education and the meaning of work. Monographs on career education. Notes. Bibliography
  • Thomas, L. E., & Robbins, P. I. (1979). Personality and work environment congruence of mid-life career changers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 52(3), 177-183.
  • Vaitenas, R., & Wiener, Y (1977). Developmental, emotional, and interest factors in voluntary mid-career change. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 11(3),291-304.
  • Wey Smola, K., & Sutton, C. D. (2002). Generational differences: Revisiting generational work values for the new millennium. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(4),363-382.
  • Whinston, S. C. (1996). The relationship among family interaction patterns and career indecision and career decision-making self-efficacy. Journal of Career Development,23(2), 137-149.
  • Wise, A. J., & Millward, L. J. (2005). The experiences of voluntary career change in 30-somethings and implications for guidance. Career Development International, 10(5), 400-417.
  • Zemke, R., Raines, C, & Filipczak, B. (2000). Generations at work. New York: American Management Association.

Abstract Views: 238

PDF Views: 0




  • Influence of Family Environment and Work Values on Vocational Preference Across Career Stages in Young Adults

Abstract Views: 238  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Anisha Juneja
Department of Psychology, University of Delhi, Delhi, India
Monika Rikhi
Department of Psychology, Sri Aurobindo College, New Delhi, India

Abstract


Career choice has the potential to influence the social mobility, economic security, employment opportunity, emotional well being and quality of life of an individual and his/her family. The process of choosing a career is a developmental task that comes as a challenge to both the child and the parent. As the child progresses across the career stages, decisions of persistence and shift are also made. The present research aimed to study the role of family environment and work values in determining the vocational preference and work values across career stages. The participants included children freshly enrolled in college, those who had been working for less than 2 years after post graduation and those working for less than 10 years, the sample size being 120. The measures used in the study were General Health Questionnaire-12, Family Environment Scale, Vocational Preference Inventory and Values Scale. Regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between the variables. The study has clinical implications for emphasising the importance of making a more planned career decision and evaluating various aspects in career stream persistence or transition.

Keywords


Family Environment, Values, Career.

References