The PDF file you selected should load here if your Web browser has a PDF reader plug-in installed (for example, a recent version of Adobe Acrobat Reader).

If you would like more information about how to print, save, and work with PDFs, Highwire Press provides a helpful Frequently Asked Questions about PDFs.

Alternatively, you can download the PDF file directly to your computer, from where it can be opened using a PDF reader. To download the PDF, click the Download link above.

Fullscreen Fullscreen Off


The objective of this paper is to analyze and identify the best classification solution for clinical decision making. Several classification algorithms Like Discriminant Analysis (LDA), Support Vector Machine (SVM), Artificial Neural Network (ANN), Naive Bayes (NB), and Decision Trees are compared to find the optimum diagnostic accuracy. The performance of classification algorithms are compared using benchmark dataset, breast cancer. The effects of normalization using z-score and min-max approaches are also investigated. The results are compared based on different performance parameters like accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and ischolar_main node error value. Accuracy has been improved for all classifications methods after normalizing the data set. Z-score normalization performs better for all the measures when compared to min-max normalization. The proposed approach shows higher accuracy rate for Naive Bayes algorithm when compared with the other algorithms.

Keywords

Accuracy, Classification, Min-Max Normalization, Sensitivity, Specificity, Z-Score Normalization
User