A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
., Shilpa
- Assessment of Storage Stability of Tinosporacordifolia (Giloy) Based Squash
Authors
Source
International Journal of Innovative Research and Development, Vol 4, No 2 (2015), Pagination:Abstract
Tinosporacordifolia (Giloy) is enriched in nutritional and therapeutic values, consumed by the people hardly in the form of decoction to cure certain ailments. There is an urgent need for recognition of medicinal properties of giloy. The plants are well known for their phyto-chemical constituents. Results of the study revealed that Giloycontainsgood amount of crude fibre (12.73) and ash content (8.35%) respectively and also enrich in various minerals, especially calcium and iron (9.41 & 9.29 mg/100g) respectively. Presently, it was attempted to utilize giloy stem samples for preparation of RTS. The prepared products were assessed for chemical, nutritional and sensory parameters. These parameters were analyzed in fresh samples as well as after the storage of 30, 60, 90 and 120 days. The beverage prepared from giloy was acceptable up to 120 days and blending of kinnow further improved the sensory quality as well. However, a slight decline in various constituents like pH, ascorbic acid and non-reducing sugars was observed during storage. In the present scenario, where lot of emphasis is being laid on the consumption of healthy foods, development of such products might help the consumers to harness the nutritional and medicinal properties of such unexploited locally available herb.
- Influence of GA and NAA on growth, yield and quality of tomato 3 (Solanum lycopersicum L.)
Authors
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 65-70Abstract
GA and NAA affect various aspects of plant physiology, mainly vegetative, flowering and quality attributes 3 including yield. A field experiment was carried out during 2020-21 at vegetable farm of CSKHPKV, Palampur, Himachal Pradesh to evaluate the effects of foliar-applied plant growth regulators gibberellic acid (GA ) and 3 Naphthalene Acidic Acid (NAA) on tomato hybrid Palam Tomato Hybrid-1. Significant impact of GA and 3 NAA at different concentrations was observed on yield and quality parameters of tomato. Among the different treatments plant growth regulators GA @75 ppm resulted maximum number of fruits per plant, fruit weight 3 and marketable yield per plant, marketable yield per m2 area, ascorbic acid content plant height and minimum number of days to 50 % flowering.Keywords
NAA, GA , protected, tomato, yieldReferences
- Aloni B, Daie J and Wyse RE. 1968. Enhancement of (14C)sucrose export from source leaves of Vicia faba by gibberellic acid. Plant Physiology 82: 962-966.
- Batlang V, VE Emongor, F Pule-Meulenburg. 2006. Effect of benzyladenine and gibberellic acid on yield and yield components of cucumber (Cucumis sativus L. cv. ‘tempo’). Journal of Agronomy 5(3):418-423.
- Chaudhary BR, Sharma MD, Shakya SM and Gautam DM. 2006. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth, yield and quality of chilli (Capsicum annum L.) at Rampur, Chitwan. Journal of Institute of Agriculture and Animal Science 27: 65-68.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. John Wiley and Sons, New York pp 680.
- Kannan K. Jawaharlal M and Prabhu M. 2009. Effect of plant growth regulators on growth and yield parameters of paprika cv. KtPl-19. Agricultural Science Digest 29: 157-162.
- Mehraj H, Sadia AA, Taufique T, Rashid M and Jamal Uddin AFM. 2014. Influence of foliar application of gibberellic acid on cherry tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. var. Cerasiforme). Journal of Experimental Bioscience 5: 27-30.
- Mostafa EAM and Saleh MMS. 2006. Influence of spraying with gibberellic acid on behavior of anna apple trees. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 2: 477-483.
- Rafeekher M, SA Nair, PN Sorte, GP Hatwal, PM Chandhan. 2002. Effect of growth regulators on growth and yield of summer cucumber. Journal of Soils Crops 12 (1):108-110.
- Ranjeet, Ram RB, Jay P and Meena ML. 2014. Growth, flowering, fruiting, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as influenced plant bio regulators. International Journal of Plant Science 9: 6771.
- Sood S, Kumar Naveen, Chandel KS and Sharma Parveen. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81(7): 590-594.
- Sun YL and Hong SK. 2010. Effects of plant growth regulators and L-glutamic acid on shoot organogenesis in the halophyte Leymus chinensis (Trin.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Culture 100:317-328.
- Ujjwal Vivak, Singh Manoj Kumar, Dev Pavitra, Chaudhary Mohit, Kumar Ashish and Tomar Saurabh. 2018. Effect of different levels of GA and NAA on 3 vegetative growth and flowering parameters of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry SP1: 146-148.
- Effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on growth and growth indices of soybean (Glycine max (L.)
Authors
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176 062, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 01 (2022), Pagination: 112-118Abstract
A field experiment was conducted during the rainy (Kharif) season of 2020 at CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur, to study the effect of organic and inorganic sources of nutrients on productivity of soybean (Glycine max L). The experiment was laid out in randomized block design comprising of eight treatments [T1 - 75 per cent RDN (FYM), T2 -100 per cent RDN (FYM), T3 -75 per cent RDF (Fertilizers), T4 - 100 per cent RDF (Fertilizers), T5 - 50 per cent RDF (Fertilizers) + 25 per cent RDN (FYM), T6 - 50 per cent RDF 5 6 (Fertilizers) + 50 per cent RDN (FYM), T7 - 100 per cent RDN (FYM) + rest P and K (Fertilizers) and T8 - Control (N P K )]. The soil of the experimental site was silty clay loam in texture and acidic in reaction, low in 0 0 0 available nitrogen (N), medium in available phosphorus (P) and potassium (K). Significantly higher plant height and dry matter accumulation recorded in T6 at all growth stages which was at par with T7 and T4 . The shortest plants were recorded in control treatment. Significantly higher absolute growth rate was noted at 30 DAS in T6 while lowest was in control treatment. Significantly higher CGR was noted at 60 DAS in T6 which was at pat with T7 and T4 while significantly higher RGR value noted in T7 which was at par with T6 and T4 while both of CGR and RGR (Relative Growth Rate) remained non-significant at all other growth stages. The lowest values of CGR and RGR were noted in T8. The highest value of DME (0.93) was recorded in T5 while the lowest value was in control. The highest UAE (Unit Area Efficiency) was noted in T5 (1685 kg/ha) followed by T6 while the lowest was in control treatment. Application of 50 per cent recommended dose of nutrients from fertilizers and 50 per cent of recommended dose of nitrogen from farm yard manure proved to be the best treatment for better growth and growth indices.Keywords
Soybean, Growth indices, Dry matter, Organic and InorganicReferences
- Anonymous. 2021a. Soybean Processors Association of India. www.sopa.org/crop.po.doc (21st May 2021) Anonymous. 2021b. www.nmoop.gov.in State-Soybean (21th May 2021) Anonymous. 2021c.www.google.com/search?q=www.nmoop.gov.in
- Baghdadi A, Halim AR, Ghasemzadeh A, Rahman MF and Sakimin SZ. 2018. Impact of organic and inorganic fertilizers on the yield and quality of silage corn intercropped with soybean. Peer Journal 5280:1-26
- Bandyopadhyay KK, Misra AK, Ghosh PK and Hati KM.2010. Effect of integrated use of farmyard manure and chemical fertilizers on soil physical properties and productivity of soybean. Soil & Tillage Research 110: 115–125.
- Blackman VH. 1919. The compound interest law and plant growth. Ann. Bot. 33:353-360.
- Chiezey UF and Odunze AC. 2009. Soybean response to application of poultry manure and phosphorus fertilizer in the Sub-humid Savanna of Nigeria. Journal of Ecology and Natural Environment 1(2):25-31.
- Dipak GP, Jaganath MA and Takankhar VJ. 2018. Effect of integrated nutrient management on growth and yield of soybean (Glycine max L. Meril). International Journal of Chemical Studies 6 (4): 264-266.
- Khan S, Khalil SK, Amanullah and Shah Z. 2013. Crop stand and phenology of wheat as affected by integrated use of organic and inorganic fertilizers. Asian Journal Agriculture Biology 1(3):141-148.
- Koushal S and Singh P. 2011. Effect of integrated use of fertilizer, FYM and biofertilizer on growth and yield performance on soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merill). Research Journal of Agricultural Science 43 (3):193-197.
- Morya Jagdesh, Tripathi RK, Kumrawat N, Singh M, Yadav RK, Tomar LS and Sahu YK. 2018. Influence of organic and inorganic fertilizers on growth, yields and nutrient uptake of soybean (Glycine max Merril L.) under Jhabua Hills. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 7 (2): 725-730.
- Panneerselvam S and Lourduraj AC. 2000. Growth and yield of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merril] as influenced by organic manures, inorganic fertilizers and weed management practices. Acta Agronomica Hungarica 48 (2): 133–140.
- Radford PJ. 1967. Growth analysis formulae-their use and abuse. Crop Science 7:171–175.
- Rathiya PS, Lakpale R, Shrivastava GK and Bargali SS. 2010. Effect of nutrient blending with FYM on biomass production and economics under hybrid cottonsoybean intercropping system. Journal of Plant Development Sciences 2(1&2): 9-18.
- Saxena SC, Manral HS and Chandel AS. 2001. Effect of inorganic and organic sources of nutrients on soybean (Glycine max). Indian Journal of Agronomy 46 (1): 135-140.
- Watson DJ. 1956. Leaf growth in relation to crop yield. FL Milthrope, Butterworths Scientific Publications. London, p 178–191.
- Influence of tillage practices and nutrients sources on growth parameters and their correlation with yield of mustard
Authors
1 Department of Agronomy, IN
2 Department of Soil Science, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur -176 062,, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 175-180Abstract
An experiment was conducted to study the effect of tillage practices and different nutrient sources on growth, growth indices and yield of mustard. The experiment was directed in split plot design comprising of three main plots [(Zero tillage, Reduced tillage and conventional tillage) and four sub plots (75% RDN, 100% RDN, 75% RDF and 100% RDF) treatments]. Results revealed that plant height (137.92 cm), dry matter accumulation 2 2 (393.03 g/m ), absolute growth rate (0.20 g/day), crop growth rate (0.83 g/m /day), dry matter efficiency (0.149 %), 2 unit area efficiency (0.00062 kg/ m /day), seed yield (1045.0 kg/ha) and straw yield (3242.3 kg/ha) of mustard were highest under reduced tillage. Among different nutrient sources, 100 per cent recommended 2 dose of fertilizer recorded highest plant height (139.72 cm), dry matter accumulation (407.81 g/m ), dry matter 2 efficiency (0.151 %), unit area efficiency (0.00065 kg/ m /day), seed yield (1098.4 kg/ha) and straw yield (3112.6 2 kg/ha) whereas absolute growth rate (0.17 g/day) and crop growth rate (0.77 g/m /day) were highest with 75 per cent recommended dose of fertilizer. Correlation studies showed that plant height, dry matter accumulation, absolute growth rate, dry matter efficiency and unit area efficiency had positive significant association with mustard yield, indicating the importance of these traits in selection for yield. It was concluded that among tillage practices, reduced tillage proved best for growth and productivity of mustard whereas in case of different nutrient sources, 100 per cent recommended dose of fertilizerwas found better.Keywords
Conventional tillage, Farm yard manure, Growth, Mustard, Reduced tillage, Yield, Zero tillage.References
- Anonymous 2019. Ministry of Agriculture and Farmers Welfare, Govt. of India. (ON2476) https:// www.indiastatagri.com/table/agriculture/selectedstate-wise-area-production-productivity-r/1409205 dated 20 th December, 2021.
- Bambal AS, Verma RM, Panchbhai DM, Mahorkar VK and Khankhane RN.1998. Effect of biofertilizers and nitrogen levels on growth and yield of cauliflower (Brassica oleracea var . Botrytis). Orissa Journal of Horticulture 26 (2):14-17.
- Chondie YG 2015. Effect of integrated nutrient management on wheat. Journal of biology, Agriculture and health care 5 (13): 68-76.
- Corbeels M, Graff, Jan de, Ndah TH, Penot E, Baudron F, Naudin K, Andrieu N, Chirat G, Schuler J, Nyagumbu I, Rusinamhodzi L, Traore K, Mzoba HD and Adolwa. 2014. Understanding the impact and adoption of conservation agriculture in Africa: A multi-scale analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 187: 155-170.
- Das TK, Bhattacharyya R, Sudhishri S, Sharma AR, Saharawat YS, Bandyopadhyay KK, Sepat, Seema, Bana RS, Aggarwal, Pramila, Sharma RK, Bhatia A, Singh G, Datta SP, Kar A, Singh B, Singh P,Pathak H, Vyas AK and Jat ML.2014. Conservation agriculture in an irrigated cotton-wheat system of the western Indogangetic plains: Crop and water productivity and economic profitability. Field Crops Research 158: 24- 33.
- Derpsch R and Friedrich T. 2010. Sustainable crop production Intensification: the adoption of conservation agriculture worldwide. 16th international soil conservation organization congress, 8-12, November 2010, Santiago, Chile, 21 p.
- Faiz MA, Bana RS, Choudhary AK, Laing AM, Bansal R, Bhatia A, Bana RC, Singh YV, Kumar V, Bamboriya SD, Padaria RN, Khaswan SL and Dabas JPS.2022. Zero Tillage, Residue Retention and System-Intensification with Legumes for Enhanced Pearl Millet Productivity and Mineral Biofortification. Sustainability 14 (543) : 1- 19.
- Farooq M and Siddique KHM.2015. Conservation agriculture: Concepts, brief history and impacts on agricultural systems. In Conservation Agriculture pp 3- 1. Siddique KHM (Eds.) Springer.
- Gangwar KS, Singh KK and Sharma SK.2004. Effects of tillage on growth, yield and nutrient uptake in wheat after rice in Indo-Gangetic Plains of India. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 14 (2): 453-459.
- Gomez KA and Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research.2nd edn. Wiley Inter Science, New York, USA. p 680.
- Kasu- Bandi BT, KidindaLK, Kasendue GN, Longanza LB, Emery KL and Lubobo AK.2019. Correlations between Growth and Yield Parameters of Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merr.) under the Influence of Bradyrhizobium japonicum in Kipushi (The Democratic Republic of Congo). American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14: 86-94.
- Katiyar SC. 2001. Water use and yield of rainfed mustard as influenced by moisture conservation practices. Indian Journal of Soil Conservation 29 (2):182-183.
- Morales OKD, Zapata MC, Alejandro GZ and Santos MC.2019. Effect of Tillage Systems on Physical Properties of a Clay Loam Soil under Oats. Agronomy 9 (62) : 1-14 .
- Saroch K, Sandal SK and Sharma PK.2012.Effect of tillage and nitrogen management on water use and productivity of late sown wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 38 (1): 31-35.
- Sekhawat K, Rathore SS, Premi OP, Kandpal BK and Chauhan JS. 2012. Advances in Agronomic Management of Indian Mustard (Brassica juncea (L.) Czernj. Cosson): An Overview. International Journal of Agronomy : 1-14.
- Singh AK.2006. Effect of tillage, water and nutrient management on soil quality parameters under riceth wheat and maize-wheat cropping zone. 18 world congress of soil Science, Pannsylvania. USA, 1-2p.
- Singh R, Singh AK and Kumar P. 2014. Performance of Indian mustard (Brassica juncea L.) in Response to Integrated Nutrient Management. Journal of Agricultural Research 1 (1) : 9-12.
- Singh MK, Singh YK, Meena RA, Kumar P, Rajput BS and Nath T.2014. Effect of tillage and mulch in mustard crop under rainfed conditions. International Journal of Tropical Agriculture 32 (1-2): 251-254
- Influence of heterografting on growth and yield characteristics of Pomato grafts
Authors
1 Department of Vegetable Science and Floriculture, College of Agriculture CSK Himachal Pradesh Krishi Vishvavidyalaya, Palampur-176062,, IN
2 Department of Plant Sciences, School of Life Sciences Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharmshala, IN
Source
Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research, Vol 48, No 2 (2022), Pagination: 210-219Abstract
The present study was conducted at Vegetable Research Farm of CSK HPKV, Palampur during the year 2019- 20 and 2020-21. The experimentation was designed in RCBD along with three replications. The data was worked out for various growth and yield of tomato and potato of pomato grafts. The outcomes of the investigation presented that maximum plant height (272.90 cm), number of fruits per cluster (8.20), fruit yield per pant (4.11 kg), tuber yield per square meter (5.44 kg), was calculated for the graft combinations i.e. K. Himalini + Rakshita, K. Himalini + PTH-1, K. Pukhraj + Avtar. Observations from the recorded data also proved that K. Jyoti+ Avtar and K. Jyoti + PTH-1 took minimum number of days for first flowering and days to harvest in case of tomato and potato i.e. 49.70 and 72.04. Hence, these graft combinations can be further recommended to grower, so they can fetch more yield from the limited land holding.Keywords
Pomato, graft combinations, yield, growth, tomato fruits, potato tuber.References
- Arefin SMA, Zeba N, Solaiman AH, Naznin MT, Azad MOK, Tabassum M and Park CH. 2019. Evaluation of compatibility, growth characteristics, and yield of tomato grafted on potato (‘Pomato’). Horticulturae 5 (37): 1-9.
- Bahadur A, Singh AK, Nadeem MA and Singh J. 2020. Pomato: Harnessing twin benefits of potato and tomato grafting. Indian Horticulture pp 30-32.
- Eppakayala K, Pidigam S, Natarajan S, Amarapalli G and Komatireddy RR. 2021. Study of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for yield and yield parameters in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) germplasm. Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry 10: 768-771.
- Giosanu D, Uleanu F, Trãneci S and Vulpe M. 2020. Aspects regarding the behavior of tomatoes grafted on potatoes. Current Trends in Natural Sciences 9 (17): 205-209.
- Gisbert C, Prohens J, Raigon MD, Stommel JR and Nuez F. 2011. Eggplant relatives as sources of variation for developing new rootstocks: effects of grafting on eggplant yield and fruit apparent quality and composition. Scientia Horticulturae 128:14-22.
- Haberal M, Korpe DA, Iseri OD and Sahin FI. 2016. Grafting tomato onto tobacco rootstocks is a practical and feasible application for higher growth and leafing in different tobacco–tomato unions. Biological, Agriculture & Horticulture 32:248-257.
- Kumar J, Singh N, Dixit PS, Yadav L, Singh BPand Tomar S. 2020. Estimation of genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance for growth and yield attributes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Archives 20:503-505.
- Kumar P, Negi V, Sharma P, Raj D, Singh A and Vats B. 2016. Grafting tomato on potato rootstocks and its effect on quality traits. Vegetable Science 43(2):263-365.
- Kumar S, Kumar P, Sharma P, Sankhyan NK and Anjali. 2021. Effect of fertilizers and fertigation treatments on pomato growth and yield under protected environments. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 10 (2): 2813-2820.
- Kumar P, Rana S, Sharma P and Negi V. 2015. Vegetable grafting: A boon to vegetable growers to combat biotic and abiotic stresses. Himachal Journal of Agricultural Research 41:1-5
- Panchbhaiya A, Singh DK, Verma P and Mallesh S. 2018. Assessment of genetic variability in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) Under polyhouse condition for fruit quality and biochemical traits. International Journal of Chemical Studies 6: 245-248.
- Pooja HM, Gasti VD, Bhavidoddi A, Yashvantkumar HK, Prashantha A and Srikantaprasad D. 2022. Genetic variability, heritability and genetic advance in determinate types of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). The Pharma Innovation 11(4): 222-225.
- Rick CM and Chetelat RT. 1995. Utilization of related wild species for tomato improvement. Acta Horticulturae 412: 21-38.
- Sood S, Kumar N, Chandel KS and Sharma P. 2011. Determination of genetic variation for morphological and yield traits in bell pepper (Capsicum annuum var. Grossum). Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 81: 590-594.
- Tessema L, Mohammed W and Abebe T. 2020. Evaluation of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) varieties for yield and some agronomic traits. Open Agriculture 5:63-74.
- Thamburaj S and Singh N. 2016. Textbook of vegetables, tuber crops and spices. Sixth edition. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi, pp 26-28.
- Zhang G and Guo H. 2018. Effects of tomato and potato hetero grafting on photosynthesis, quality and yield of grafted parents. Horticulture, Environment, and Biotechnology 60:9-18.