Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Wadile, S. C.
- Influence of Irrigation Scheduling and Mulching on Yield and Economics in Summer Sweet Corn
Abstract Views :171 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dhukle (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dhule (M.S.), IN
1 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dhukle (M.S.), IN
2 Department of Agronomy, College of Agriculture, Dhule (M.S.), IN
Source
International Research Journal of Agricultural Economics and Statistics, Vol 8, No 2 (2017), Pagination: 315-319Abstract
A field experiment was carried out at Post Graduate, Research Farm of Agronomy Section in the College of Agriculture., Dhule in summer season of 2014 to study the influence of irrigation scheduling and mulching on yield and economics in summer sweet corn.The results of present investigation showed that, with different irrigation and mulching treatments significantly increased the green cob and fodder yield. But, the interaction effect between irrigation scheduling and mulching found to be non-significant. From the present study, it is observed that, irrigation treatment IW/CPE ratio 1.00 gave highest green cob yield (190.82 q ha-1) and fodder yield (348.66 q ha-1) with maximum gross monetary returns (Rs. 243045 ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs. 169113 ha-1) and higher benefit cost ratio (3.26). While, mulching@ 5 t/ha. gave highest green cob yield (175.43 q ha-1) and fodder yield (342.55q ha-1) with higher gross monetary returns (Rs. 226808 ha-1), net monetary returns (Rs.153983 ha-1) and higher benefit cost ratio (3.11). Whereas, the minimum green cob and fodder yield with lower economics were recorded in irrigation treatment as per critical growth stages and without mulching. The mulching is done by using chick pea husk after 10th day from the common irrigation.Keywords
Sweet Corn, Irrigation Scheduling, Mulching.
References
- Anonymous (2016). Project director review, annual maize workshope. University of Agricultural Sciences, Bengaluru, Karnataka (India), 10-12 April, 2016. pp. 02-03.
- Gosavi (2006). Effect of mulches, fertilizer and levels of organic manure on the performance of rabi sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata). M.Sc. (Ag.) Thesis, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan Krishi Vidyapeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, M.S. (INDIA).
- Hussaini, M.A., Ogunlela, V.B., Ramalan, A.A. and Falaki, A.M. (2001). Growth and development of maize (Zea mays L.) in response to different levels of nitrogen, phosphorus and irrigation.Crop Res., 22 (2): 141-149.
- Jadhav, B.S., Jadhav, A.S. and Jadhav, S.B. (1993). Effect of irrigation scheduling methods and mulching on Rabi maize. J. Maharashtra Agric. Univ., 18: 31-57.
- Kumar, Manish,Tripathi, R.S. and Shrivastava, G.K. (2001). Quality and yield of winter maize as affected by varying genotypes, nitrogen levels and irrigation schedules. Madras Agric. J., 88 (10-12): 693-696.
- Leta, Tulu, Ramachandrappa, B.K. and Nanjappa, H.V. (1998). Response of maize (Zea mays L.) to moisture stress at different growth stages in Alfisols during summer. Mysore J. Agric. Sci., 32: 201-207.
- Painyuli, Amit, Pal, M.S., Bhatnagar, Amit and Bisht, A.S. (2013). Effect of planting techniques and irrigation scheduling on productivity and water use efficiency of sweet corn (Zea mays saccharata).Indian J. Agron., 58 (3) : 344-348.
- Pinjari, S.S. (2007). Effect of integrated nutrient management and polythene mulch on the performance of sweet corn under lateratic soils of Konkan. Ph. D. (Ag.) Thesis, Dr. Balasaheb Sawant Konkan KrishVidyaeeth, Dapoli, Ratnagiri, M.S. (INDIA).
- Shivakumar, H.K., Ramchanrappa, B.K., Nanjappa, H.V. and Mudalagiriyappa (2011). Effect of phenophase based irrigation schedules on growth, yield and quality of baby corn (Zea mays L.), Agric. Sci., 2 (3): 267-272.
- Singh, Kalyan., Singh, U.N., Singh, V., Singh, S.R., Chandel, R.S. and Singh, K.K. (2002). Effect of tillage; inter terrace and mulching on yield and nutrient uptake by maize (Zea mays) and chick pea (Cicerarietinum) cropping system. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 72 (12): 728–730.