Refine your search
Co-Authors
- S . B. Chavan
- A. Keerthika
- S. K. Dhyani
- A. K. Handa
- K. Rajarajan
- S. B. Chavan
- Ankur Jha
- Badre Alam
- A. R. Uthappa
- K. B. Sridhar
- Naresh Kumar
- Dhiraj Kumar
- O. P. Chaturvedi
- R. H. Rizvi
- Rajendra Prasad
- Abhishek Saxena
- P. S. Karmakar
- Amit Jain
- Mayank Chaturvedi
- Anil Kumar Singh
- Abhishek Maurya
- Gargi Gupta
- Kedari Singh
- Asha Ram
- Veeresh Kumar
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Newaj, Ram
- National Agroforestry Policy in India:A Low Hanging Fruit
Abstract Views :316 |
PDF Views:82
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 108, No 10 (2015), Pagination: 1826-1834Abstract
Since ages agroforestry has been known as a traditional land-use system in India. The multivarious benefits and services generated are recognized as a tool to improve the livelihood status of farmers. Commercial agroforestry gained momentum in the regions where it got support from industry and assured market facilities. However, lack of policy initiatives and strict trade regulations has not supported wide adoption of agroforestry. Though prominent agroforestry models are being developed in different parts of the country, there is no clear-cut mechanism from seed procurement to marketing of the products. In this context, the National Agroforestry Policy, 2014 came in limelight to address the issues of quality planting material, tree insurance, restrictions on transit and harvesting, marketing of agroforestry produce, research and extension. This article links highlights of the policy to existing successful ground-level schemes and the challenges to focus on agroforestry not only as a successful land-use system, but also to utilize its full potential in the economic development of the country.Keywords
Agroforestry Policy, Public Private Partnership, Sustainability, Tree Insurance.- A Note on Albinism in Madhuca latifolia J.F. Gmel
Abstract Views :238 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 National Research Center for Agroforestry, Jhansi- 284003 (UP), IN
2 Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342 003 (Rajasthan), IN
1 National Research Center for Agroforestry, Jhansi- 284003 (UP), IN
2 Central Arid Zone Research Institute, Jodhpur - 342 003 (Rajasthan), IN
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 142, No 4 (2016), Pagination: 400-402Abstract
No Abstract.- Biomass and Carbon Storage in Trees Grown under Different Agroforestry Systems in Semi Arid Region of Central India
Abstract Views :337 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), IN
1 Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi (Uttar Pradesh), IN
Source
Indian Forester, Vol 142, No 7 (2016), Pagination: 642-648Abstract
The biomass and carbon storage was assessed in a well established agroforestry experiment on Albizia procera and Dalbergia sissoo under irrigated condition and Emblica officinalis and Hardwickia binata under rainfed conditions during 2011. A. procera accumulated maximum biomass (120.421 ha-1 at 11-year age) followed by D. sissoo accumulated 84.751 biomass ha-1 at age of 17-year under irrigated conditions. Similarly, biomass accumulation in E. officinalis was 14.991 ha-1 at age of 15-year and H. binata accumulated 101.341 biomass ha-1 at age of 20-year. A. procera being a fast growing tree had have higher biomass productivity (10.95 t ha-1 yr-1) followed by D. sissoo (4.99 t ha-1 yr-1) and H. binata (5.10 t ha-1 yr-1 ). E. officinalis is being a fruit bearing plant having minimum biomass productivity (1.03t ha-1 yr-1) among all the species. The carbon storage in A. procera was maximum (57.031C ha-1) followed by D. sissoo (36.621C ha-1) under irrigated conditions. Carbon storage in E. officinalis at 15-year age was 7.121 C ha-1 and in H. binata, it was 46.131 C ha-1 at 20-year age under rainfed condition.Keywords
Agroforestry, Allometric Equation, Biomass Productivity, Carbon Sequestration, Root:Shoot Ratio.References
- Ajit Das D.K., Chaturvedi O.P., Jabeen N. and Dhyani S.K. (2011). Predictive models for dry weight estimation of above and below ground components of Populas deltoides in India:Development and comparative diagnosis. Biomass and Bioenergy,35(3):1145-1152.
- Ajit, Dhyani S.K., Ram Newaj, Handa A.K., Prasad R., Alam B., Rizhvi R.H., Uma and Amit Jain. (2013). Modeling analysis of potential carbon sequestration under existing agroforestry systems in three districts of Indo-gangetic plains in India. Agroforestry Systems, 87(5): 1129-1145.
- Albrecht A. and Kandji S. T.(2003). Carbon sequestration in tropical agroforestry systems. Agricaltare Ecosystems and Environment, 99:15-27.
- Arora G., Chaturvedi S., Kaushal R., Nain A.,Tewari S.L., Alam N.M. and Chaturvedi O.P (2014). Growth, biomass, carbon stocks, and sequestration in an age series of Populus deltoides plantations in Tarai region of central Himalaya. Tukish Journal of Agriculture Forestry,38:1-11.
- Cairns M. A., Sandra Brown, Helmer E. H. and Baumgardner G. A.(1997). Root biomass allocation in the world's upland forests. Oecologia,111:1-11
- Cannell M.G.R. (1982). World forest biomass and primary production data. Academic Press, London.
- Chauhan S.K., Gupta N., Ritu, Yadava S. and Chauhan R. (2009). Biomass and Carbon allocation in different parts of agroforestry tree species. Indian Forester, 135:981-992.
- Chauhan S.K., Sharma S.C, Chauhan R., Gupta N. and Srivastava R. (2010). Accounting poplar and wheat productivity for carbon sequestration in agrisilviculture system, Indian Forester, 136:1174-1182.
- Chavan B.L. and Rasal G.B. (2011). Potentiality of carbon sequestration in six year ages young plant from university campus of Aurangabad. Global J. researches in engineering Chemical engineering, 11:16-20.
- Chavan S., Ram Newaj, Keerthika A., Asha Ram, Jha A. and Kumar A. (2014). Agroforestry for adaptation and mitigation of climate change. Popular Kheti, 2(3): 214-220.
- Chhabra A. and Dadhwal V.K. (2004). Assessment of major pools and fluxes of carbon in Indian forest. Climate change, 64:341-360
- Dhyani S.K., Handa A.K. and Uma. (2013). Area under agroforestry in India: An assessment for present status and future perspective. Indian J. agroforestry, 15:1-11.
- Dixon R.K., Andrasko K.J., Sussman F.A., Lavinso M.A., Trexler M.C. and Vinson T.S. (1993). Tropical forests: their past, present and potential future role in the terrestrial carbon budget. Water Air Soil Pollution,70:71-94.
- FSI (2013). Forest Survey of India India, state of forest report. FSI, Ministry of Environment and forest Kaulagarh Road, PO -IPE Dehradun 248195 India.
- Goswami S., Verma K.S. and Kaushal R. (2013). Biomass and carbon sequestration in different agroforestry systems of a Western Himalayan watershed, Biol. Agric. Hortic. An International Journal for Sustainable Production Systems, 30:88-96
- Kanime N., Kausha, R. Tewari S.K., Raverkar K.P, Chaturvedi S. and Chaturvedi O.P (2013). Biomass production and carbon sequestration in different tree-based systems of Central Himalayan Tarairegion. Forests, Trees and Livehoods, 22:38-50.
- Kraenezel M., Castillo A., Moore T. and Potvin C. (2003). Carbon storage of harvest age Teak plantation, Panama. Forest, ecology and Management, 173:213-22S.
- Krankina O.N. and Dixon R.K. (1994). Forest management options to conserve and sequester terrestrial carbon in the Russian Federation. World Resource Review, 6:88-101.
- Lugo A. E., Wang D.and Bormann F.H. (1990). A comparative analysis of biomass production in five tropical tree species. Forest Ecology and Management, 31:153-166
- Manickam V., lyyanki V., Murali Krishna, Sree Shanti and Radhika R. (2014). Biomass calculations for carbon sequestration in forest ecosystem casestudy of AndhraPradesh, India. J.Energy Chemical Engineering,2:30-38.
- NRCAF, 2006. Perspective Plan-Vision 2025, NRCAF, Jhansi, U.P.
- Pandey D.N. (2007). Multifuctional agroforestry systems in India. Current Science, 92:455-463.
- Rai P., Yadav R.S., Solanki K.R., Rao G.R. and Singh R. (2001). Growth and pruned biomass production of multipurpose tree species in silvipastoral system on degraded lands in semiarid region of Uttar Pradesh, India. Forest Tree and Livelihood, 11:347-364.
- Ram Newaj and Dhyani S.K. (2008). Agroforestry for carbon sequestration: Scope and present status. Indian J. Agroforestry, 10:1-9.
- Rizvi R.H., Dhyani S.K., Yadav R.S. and Singh R. (2011). Biomass production and carbon stock of poplar agroforestry systems in Yamunanagar and Saharanpur districts of northwestern India. Current Science, 100:736-742.
- Santantonio D., Hermann R.K. and Overton W.S. (1977). Root biomass studies in forest ecosystems. Pedobiologia, 17:1-31.
- Sathaye J.A. and Ravindranath N.H. (1998). Climate change mitigation in the energy and forestry sectors of developing countries. Annual Review Energy Environment, 23:387-437.
- Schroeder P (1994). Carbon storage benefits of agroforestry. AgroForestry Systems, 27:89-97.
- Singh G. (2005). Carbon sequestration under an agrisilvicultural system in the arid region. Indian Forester, 131:543-552.
- Snowdon P, Raison J., Grierson P, Adams M., Montagu K., Bi H., Burrows W. and Eamus D. (2002). Protocol for sampling tree and stand biomass. National Carbon accounting system technical report No.31. Australian Greenhouse Office, Canberra.
- Tyagi K., Sharma S.D. and Tyagi P (2009). Development of biomass and productivity in an age series of Dalbergia sissoo plantations in sodic lands of Uttar pradesh. Annals of Forestry, 17(2): 219-237.
- Winjum J.K., Dixon R.K. and Schroeder PE. (1992). Estimating the global potential of forest and agroforest management practices to sequester carbon. Water, Air and Soil Pollution, 64:213-228.
- Trees for Life:Creating Sustainable Livelihood in Bundelkhand Region of Central India
Abstract Views :275 |
PDF Views:101
Authors
S. B. Chavan
1,
A. R. Uthappa
1,
K. B. Sridhar
1,
A. Keerthika
2,
A. K. Handa
1,
Ram Newaj
1,
Naresh Kumar
1,
Dhiraj Kumar
1,
O. P. Chaturvedi
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-Central Arid Zone Research Institute, RRS, Pali-Marwar 306 401, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 111, No 6 (2016), Pagination: 994-1002Abstract
Trees have been a part of life for centuries in India for sustainable livelihood security. Under the difficult climatic situations, farmers are forced to adopt tree-based systems to secure their income and livelihood. Non-timber forest products (NTFPs) harvesting, collection and processing are creating several employment opportunities in the drought-prone Bundelkhand region of India. This article aims to document the livelihood dependency on trees of farmers, tribals and landless labourers for income generation. Surveys and interviews in Bundelkhand region provided an overview of the dependency of different rural communities on NTFPs such as gum, dona pattal, lac from Butea; brooms, jaggery and baskets from Phoenix; flowers and seeds from mahua; bidi leaves from tendu and sticks from bamboo for sustaining their livelihood. To promote NTFPs-based livelihood enterprises, more emphasis should be given for sustainable harvest, value-addition and marketing.Keywords
Employment Generation, Sustainable Livelihood, Trees.- Assessment of Carbon Storage Potential and Area under Agroforestry Systems in Gujarat Plains by Co2fix Model and Remote Sensing Techniques
Abstract Views :174 |
PDF Views:92
Authors
R. H. Rizvi
1,
Ram Newaj
1,
Rajendra Prasad
1,
A. K. Handa
1,
Badre Alam
1,
S. B. Chavan
1,
Abhishek Saxena
1,
P. S. Karmakar
1,
Amit Jain
1,
Mayank Chaturvedi
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 110, No 10 (2016), Pagination: 2005-2011Abstract
Agroforestry is a traditional and ancient land use practice, having deliberate integration of trees with crop and livestock components. In India, agroforestry practices are prevalent in different agro-ecological zones and occupy sizeable areas. These practices have great potential for climate change mitigation through sequestration of atmospheric CO2. Carbon sequestration potential was studied in four districts of Gujarat (Anand, Dahod, Patan and Junagarh), for which field survey was conducted to collect primary data on existing agroforestry systems. The extent of agroforestry area in these districts was estimated by sub-pixel classifier using medium resolution remote sensing data (RS-2/LISS III). By sub-pixel classifier, the highest area under agroforestry was estimated in Dahod (12.48%) followed by Junagarh district (10.95%) with an average of 9.12%. Sapota (Manilkara zapota) based agroforestry was also mapped in Junagarh district, which occupied an area of 1.13%. An accuracy of 87.2% was found by sub-pixel classifier in delineation of sapota-based agroforestry in the district. Dynamic CO2FIX model has been used to estimate total carbon (biomass + soils) and net carbon sequestered in existing agroforestry systems. Net carbon sequestered over a simulated period of 30 years in Anand, Dahod, Patan and Junagarh districts was found to be 2.70, 6.26, 1.61 and 1.50 Mg C ha-1 respectively. Total carbon stock in all four districts for baseline and simulated period of 30 years was estimated to be 2.907 and 3.251 million tonnes respectively. Thus, agroforestry systems in Gujarat have significant potential in carbon storage and trapping atmospheric CO2 into biomass and soils. Hence, CO2FIX model in conjunction with remote sensing techniques can be successfully applied for estimating carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in a district or a region.Keywords
Agroforestry, Geospatial, Remote Sensing, Sub-Pixel, Tree Cover.- Soil Organic Carbon Stock in Agroforestry Systems in Western and Southern Plateau and Hill Regions of India
Abstract Views :275 |
PDF Views:92
Authors
Ram Newaj
1,
O. P. Chaturvedi
1,
Dhiraj Kumar
1,
Rajendra Prasad
1,
R. H. Rizvi
1,
Badre Alam
1,
A. K. Handa
1,
S. B. Chavan
1,
Anil Kumar Singh
1,
Mayank Chaturvedi
1,
P. S. Karmakar
1,
Abhishek Maurya
1,
Abhishek Saxena
1,
Gargi Gupta
1,
Kedari Singh
1
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Jhansi 284 003, IN
Source
Current Science, Vol 112, No 11 (2017), Pagination: 2191-2193Abstract
The rising level of carbon dioxide (CO2) in the atmosphere is a major concern, as scientific evidences show that it is the primary cause of global warming. CO2 concentration is expected to double by the middle or end of the 21st century, with a temperature rise between 1.5°C and 4.5°C (ref. 1). The importance of agroforestry as a land-use system is receiving wider recognition not only in terms of agricultural sustainability, but also in issues related to carbon sequestration or climate change.References
- Smith, K. A., Ball, T., Conen, F., Dobbie, K. E., Massheder, J. and Rey, A., Eur. J. Soil Sci., 2003, 54, 779–791.
- Verma, K. S., Kumar, S. and Bhardwaj, D. R., J. Tree Sci., 2008, 27(1), 14–27.
- Jordan, C. F., Agrofor. Syst., 2004, 61, 79–90.
- Peichl, M., Thevathasan, N. V., Gordon, A. M., Huss, J. and Abohassan, R. A., Agrofor. Syst., 2006, 66, 243–257.
- Lorenz, K. and Lal, R., Agron. Sustain. Dev., 2014, 34, 443–454.
- Nair, P. K. R., Agrofor. Syst., 2012, 86, 243–253.
- Haile, S. G., Nair, V. D. and Nair, P. K. R., Global Change Biol., 2010, 16, 427–438.
- Upson, M. A. and Burgess, P. J., Plant Soil, 2013, 373, 43–58.
- Walkley, A. J. and Black, C. A., Soil Sci., 1934, 37, 29–38.
- Soto-Pinto, L., Anzueto, M., Mendoza, J., Ferrer, G. J. and de Jong, B., Agrofor. Syst., 2010, 78, 39–51.
- Nair, P. K. R. and Nair, V. D., Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain., 2014, 6, 22–27.
- Hendrick, R. L. and Pregitzer, K. S., J. Ecol., 1996, 84, 167–176.
- Martin, M. P., Wattenbach, M., Smith, P., Meersmans, J., Jolivet, C., Boulonne, L. and Arrouays, D., Biogeosciences, 2011, 8, 1053–1065.
- Munoz-Rojas, M., Jordan, A., Zavala, L. M., De la Rosa, D., Abd-Elmabod, S. K. and Anaya-Romero, M., Solid Earth, 2012, 3, 375–386.
- Swamy, S. L. and Puri, S., Agrofor. Syst., 2005, 64, 181–195.
- Fine Roots Dynamics and Biomass of Phyllanthus Emblica-Based Agroforestry System in Bundelkhand Region of Central India
Abstract Views :214 |
PDF Views:78
Authors
Affiliations
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Gwalior Road, Near Pahuj Dam, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru 560 024, IN
1 ICAR-Central Agroforestry Research Institute, Gwalior Road, Near Pahuj Dam, Jhansi 284 003, IN
2 ICAR-National Bureau of Agricultural Insect Resources, Bengaluru 560 024, IN