Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Journals
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Bogra, Poonam
- Comparative Evaluation of Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored with Resin Fiber Postand Stainless Steel Post: An in Vitro Study
Abstract Views :277 |
PDF Views:115
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, DAV(C) Dental College & Hospital, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MM College of Dental Science & Research, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, DAV(C) Dental College & Hospital, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Conservative Dentistry & Endodontics, MM College of Dental Science & Research, Haryana, IN
Source
Dental Journal of Advance Studies, Vol 3, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 80-84Abstract
Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with post. Aims:This study aims to compare the fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with resin fiber and stainless steel post. Commercially available prefabricated resin fiber post (Dentsply Maillefer Easy Post), prefabricated stainless steel post (Coltene/Whaledent Parapost) were used. Methods & Material: Forty five maxillary central incisors were obturated and divided into 3 groups: Control Group (Group I) without any post (n = 15), Resin Fiber Post Group (Group II) (n = 15) and Stainless Steel Post Group (Group III) (n = 15). In all Groups except control group, post space was prepared; a post was cemented, and a core build-up was provided. All the specimens were subjected to compressive force under a universal testing machine until fracture. Statistical analysis used: The results were analyzed using the variable analysis test (ANOVA). Results: One-way analysis of variance revealed significant difference among test groups. The control group demonstrated highest fracture resistance (925.2183 N), followed by the resin fiber post group (486.7265 N) and stainless steel post group (423.539N). Conclusion: Teeth restored with resin fiber post showed higher fracture resistance values than prefabricated stainless steel post.Keywords
Fiber Post, Parapost, Fracture Resistance.Full Text
References
- Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: a study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780–4.
- Nandini VV, Venkatesh V. Current concepts in the restoration of endodontically treated teeth. J Ind Prosth Soc 2006;6(2):637.
- Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosth Dent. 1994;71(6):565-7.
- ShillingburgHT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of Fixed Prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence. 1998.
- Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Restoration of endodontically involved teeth. In: Caputo AA, Standlee JP, editors. Biomechanics in Clinical Dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence 1987;185–203.
- Qualtrough AJE, Mannocci F. Tooth-colored post systems: a review. Oper Dent 2003;28:86–91.
- Maccari P., Conceiçao E., Nunes M. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with three different prefabricated esthetic posts. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry 2003;15(1):25-31.
- Butz F., Lennon A. Survival Rate and Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Maxillary Incisors with Moderate Defects Restored with Different Post-and-Core Systems: An in Vitro Study. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2001;14: 58-64.
- Raygo C., Chai J. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodontically treated teeth restored with a Carbon Fiber-Reinforced Resin post system in vitro. International Journal of Prosthodontics 2001;14: 141-45.
- Turner C. The retention of dental posts. J Dent 1982;10: 154–65.
- Hansen E, Caputo A. Cementing mediums and retentive characteristics of dowels. J Prosthet Dent.1974;32:551–7.
- Chapman K, Worley J, von Fraunhofer J. Retention of prefabricated posts by cements and resins. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 54:649–52.
- Newman M. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth restored with composite posts. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 2003; 89(4):306-7.
- Cheung W. A review of the management of endodontically treated teeth: post, core and the final restoration. J Am Dent Assoc 2005;136:611-9.
- Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:10-14.
- Hornbrook DS, Hastings JH. Use of a bondable reinforcement fiber for post and core build up in an endodontically treated teeth: maximizing strength and aesthetics. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent 1995; 7:33-42.
- Craig RG, Peyton FA. Elastic and mechanical properties of human dentin. J Dent Res 1958;37:710-18.
- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999;27:275-78.
- Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10–15.
- Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993; 69:36-40.
- Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155–61.
- Mendoza DB, Eakle WS, Kahl EA, Ho R. Root reinforcement with a resin bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78:10-4.
- Martinez Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-32.
- Joshi S, Mukherjee A, Kheur M, Mehta A. Mechanical performance of endodontically treated teeth. Finite elements in analysis and design 2001; 37:587–601.
- Kinney JH, Marshall SJ, Marshall GW. The mechanical properties of human dentin: a critical review and re-evaluation of the dental literature. Crit Rev Oral Biol Med 2003;14:13–29.
- Artopoulou II, O'Keefe KL, Powers JM. Effect of core diameter and surface treatment on the retention of resin composite cores to prefabricated endodontic posts. J Prosthodont 2006;15:172–9.
- Ceballos L, Garrido MA, Fuentes Vl. Mechanical characterization of resin cements used for luting fiber posts by nanoindentation. Dent Mater 2007;23:100–5.
- Naumann M, Preuss A, Frankenberger R. Reinforcement effect of adhesively luted fiber reinforced composite versus titanium posts. Dent Mater 2007; 23:138–44.
- The Effect of Different Post Materials and Cements on Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth - an in Vitro Study
Abstract Views :247 |
PDF Views:100
Authors
Affiliations
1 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Sukhmani Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, IN
2 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Himachal Pradesh, IN
3 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D.A.V. Dental College and Hospital, Haryana, IN
4 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College, Uttar Pradesh, IN
5 Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Sukhmani Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, IN
1 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sri Sukhmani Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, IN
2 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bhojia Dental College and Hospital, Himachal Pradesh, IN
3 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, D.A.V. Dental College and Hospital, Haryana, IN
4 Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Subharti Dental College, Uttar Pradesh, IN
5 Dept. of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Sri Sukhmani Dental College and Hospital, Punjab, IN
Source
Dental Journal of Advance Studies, Vol 4, No 1 (2016), Pagination: 38-43Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the effect of various post materials and cements on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. Material and Methods: Three post systems; custom made Ni-Cr post and core, prefabricated stainless steel and carbon fibre post with composite core and two different luting cements i.e glass ionomer and resin cements were used. Results and Conclusions: Carbon fibre post cemented with resin cements showed higher failure load than Ni-Cr and stainless steel post and resin cement performed better than glass ionomer cement, the mode of fracture was more favourable with carbon fibre post than in metallic post.Keywords
Custom Made Ni-Cr Post, Glass Ionomer Cement, Prefabricated Carbon Fibre Post, Prefabricated Stainless Steel Post, Resin Cement.Full Text
References
- Cohen Burns. Pathways of the Pulp: 8th Ed.; Mosby Pb. 2002.
- Ingle, Bakland. Endodontics: 5th Ed.; William & Wilkins Pb.2002.
- Marzouk, Simonton AL., Gross RD. Operative DentistryModern Theory and practice. Ist Ed.; Ishiyaku Euro. American Inc. 1997.
- Rosensteil. Contemporary Fixed Prosthodontics 2nd Ed. Mosby Pb. 1995.
- Weine . Endodontic therapy: 6th Ed.; Mosby Pb. 2004.
- Akkayan B, Gulmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431 - 437.
- Al-harbi F, Nathanson D. In vitro assessment of retention of four esthetic dowels to resin core foundation and teeth. J Prosthet Dent 2003; 90: 547 - 555.
- Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275 - 278.
- Butz F. Survival rate and fracture strength of Endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post and core system; An invitro study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001; 14: 58-64.
- Mezzomo E, Massa F, Libera SD. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with two different post and core designs cemented with two different cements: An in vitro study. Part I. Quintessence Int. 2003; 34: 301 - 306.
- Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodotnically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber – reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 141 - 145.
- Mendoza DB. Root reinforcement with a resin bonded preformed post. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 10 - 15.
- Isidor F, Odman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1996; 9: 131 - 136.
- Ottl P. Fracture characteristics of carbon fiber, ceramic and non-palladium endodontic post systems as monotonously increasing loads. J Oral Rehabil 2002; 29: 175 - 183.
- Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998; 24 (12): 807 - 810.
- Hu Y-H. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated anterior teeth restored with four post and core systems. Quintessence Int 2003; 34 : 349 - 353.
- Raygot CG, Chai J, Jameson DL. Fracture resistance and primary failure mode of endodotnically treated teeth restored with a carbon fiber – reinforced resin post system in vitro. Int J Prosthodont 2001; 14: 141 - 145.
- Sidoli G E .:An invitro evaluation of a carbon fiber based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent. 1997; 78: 5 - 9.
- Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. Invitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. Part-I. J Prosthet Dent 1979; 42 : 39 - 44.
- Bergman B, Lundquist P et al. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1989, 61: 10-15.
- Condos S, Deutsch AS, Musikant BL. Fracture strength of three different core materials in combination with there different endodotnic posts. Int J Prosthodont. 1994; 7 : 178-82.
- Dale JW. A clinical evaluation of semi-precious alloys for dowels and cores. J Prosthet Dent. 1977; 38: 161-167.