Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy with Organizational Commitment among Female Counselors


Affiliations
1 Department of Counseling, Marvdasht Branch Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran, Islamic Republic of
2 Department of Educational Science Farhangian University, Fars, Iran, Islamic Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


This research has been conducted to explain the relationship between job satisfaction and self-efficacy with organizational commitment. This research is a descriptive - correlation method in terms of purpose and nature of application. The statistical population of this study consisted of all women counselors in Shiraz education and education area who were selected by simple random sampling of 146 individuals. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and self-efficacy questionnaires were used to collect data. Their validity and reliability were confirmed. Data were analyzed at two descriptive levels (percentage, mean, & standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient & regression). The results showed that there is a significant relationship between job satisfaction and its dimensions and organizational commitment of counselors. The dimensions of law and colleagues can predict organizational commitment, there is a significant relationship between self-efficacy and organizational commitment of counselors And self-efficacy can predict the organizational commitment of counselors.

Keywords

Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Allen, N.J., & Meyer, J.P (1990). The measure and antccendes of effective continuance and normative commitment of the organization. Journal of Aceupational Psychology, 63,1-18.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action. Asocial cognitive theory. Englewood cliffs. N. J. prentice Hall.
  • Cheemers, M. M., Hu, L. T., & Garcia, B. F. (2001). Self-efficacy and first-year collage student performance and adjustment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 49-55.
  • Cherry, K. (2008). What is self-efficacy? Psychology Definitin of the week, psychology Guide (adout.com: psychology).
  • Engle, M. C. (2004). Changes in job satisfaction and productivity between team-directed and single- leader work groups. Dissertation Abstract PhD. Capella university.
  • Fouri, A. S. (2004). Prediction satisfaction with quality of work life. Master s Thesise. University of South Africa.
  • Freeman, B. (2000). Job satisfaction as an economic variable. American Economic Review, 68(2), 135-141.
  • Ivancevich, J.M., & Donnelly, J.H. (2005). Job satisfaction research: Manageable guide for practitioners. Personnel Journal, 74(1), 24-41.
  • Konrad, A.M., & Mengel, R. (2000). The impact of work life program on firm productivity. Strategic Management Journal, 21(12), 12-25.
  • Layer, J. K., Karwowski, W., & Furr, A. (2009). The effect of cognitive demands and perceived quality of work life on human performance in manufacturing environments. International Journal of 'IndustrialErgonomics, 39, 413-421.
  • Locke, E. (1999). What is job satisfaction? Organization Behavior Human Performance, 4(2), 45-63.
  • Meyer, P. J., & Hersovitch, L. (2006). Commitment in the workplace: Towad a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 299-326.
  • Pajares, E, & Kranzeler, J. (1995). Self-efficacy beliefs and general mental ability in mathematical problem-solving. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 426- 443.
  • Robert, R. (2002). An analysis of the relationship between quality of work life and motivation for correctional service officers in the montreal area. Ph.D. Dissertation. Mcgrill University (Canada).
  • Rose, R.C., Beh, L.S, Uli, J., & Idris, K. (2006). Quality of work life: Implications of career dimension. Journal of Social Sciences, 2, 61-67.
  • Ting, Y. (2007). Determinants of job satisfaction of federal government employees. Public Personnel Management, 26(12), 32-45.
  • Zimmerman, B.J. (2000). Becoming a self-regulated learner: Which are the key subprocesses? Contemporary Education Psychology, 11, 307-313.

Abstract Views: 227

PDF Views: 0




  • Relationship Between Job Satisfaction and Self-Efficacy with Organizational Commitment among Female Counselors

Abstract Views: 227  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Farkhondeh Rezvani
Department of Counseling, Marvdasht Branch Islamic Azad University, Marvdasht, Iran, Islamic Republic of
Hossein Aflakifard
Department of Educational Science Farhangian University, Fars, Iran, Islamic Republic of

Abstract


This research has been conducted to explain the relationship between job satisfaction and self-efficacy with organizational commitment. This research is a descriptive - correlation method in terms of purpose and nature of application. The statistical population of this study consisted of all women counselors in Shiraz education and education area who were selected by simple random sampling of 146 individuals. Organizational commitment, job satisfaction and self-efficacy questionnaires were used to collect data. Their validity and reliability were confirmed. Data were analyzed at two descriptive levels (percentage, mean, & standard deviation) and inferential statistics (Pearson correlation coefficient & regression). The results showed that there is a significant relationship between job satisfaction and its dimensions and organizational commitment of counselors. The dimensions of law and colleagues can predict organizational commitment, there is a significant relationship between self-efficacy and organizational commitment of counselors And self-efficacy can predict the organizational commitment of counselors.

Keywords


Organizational Commitment, Job Satisfaction, Self-Efficacy.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15614/ijpp%2F2018%2Fv9i4%2F181024