A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Shettar, Netravati
- Importance of Screening in 0-18 Months Infants by using INFANIB at Tertiary Hospital
Authors
1 Department of Physiotherapy, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, IN
2 Department of Pediatrics, SDM College of Medical Sciences and Hospital, Dharwad, IN
3 Pediatric Physiotherapist, Regional Neuroscience Centre, Hubli, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 7, No 3 (2013), Pagination: 184-186Abstract
Objectives: Child development is a dynamic process and is often hard to measure by its very nature. The various streams of development, including gross motor, fine motor, language, cognitive, and adaptive behaviour, are interrelated and complex within themselves. Developmental delay refers to when a child's development lags behind established normal ranges for his or her age. The prevalence of developmental delay, deviation, disability or deformity in India is 2.5%. So the objective of this study was to screen the infants at Tertiary hospital and to categorize them as normal, transiently abnormal & abnormal neurologic development according to the INFANIB score.Design: Cross sectional study
Method: 639 subjects were included in this study. According to the INFANIB manual guidelines, screening test was administered and infants were categorized as normal, transiently abnormal and abnormal neurologic development. Then, the data was evaluated statistically and results were obtained.
Results: In Group 1(age of less than 4 months) as per INFANIB score out of 194 samples there were 161(82.99%) normal, 24(12.37%) transiently abnormal and 9(4.64%) abnormal neurologic development infants. Group 2 (age of 4-8 month) had 162(86.63%) normal, 12(6.42%) transiently abnormal and 13(6.95%) abnormal neurologic development infants out of 187 samples. In Group 3(age of 8 months or more) out of 258 samples there were 205(79.46%) normal, 18(6.98%) transiently abnormal and 35(13.57%) abnormal neurologic development infants. When all three age groups were considered, there were 528(82.63%) normal, 54(8.45%) transiently abnormal, 57(8.92%) abnormal neurologic development infants.
Conclusion: On INFANIB screening, there were 8.45% transiently abnormal and 8.92% abnormal neurologic development infants at the Tertiary hospital.
Keywords
Screening, INFANIB, 0-18 Month's Children
References
- Developmental delay. Encyclopedia of children’s health 2005 Available from URL: http:// www. e n o t e s . c o m / c h i l d r e n s - h e a l t h encyclopedia/ developmental-delay.
- Tervo R. Identifying Patterns of Developmental Delays Can Help Diagnose Neurodevelopmental Disorders. A Paediatric Perspective 2003 july;12(3):1-6.
- Soleimani F, Vameghi R, Hemmati S, Roghani RS. Perinatal and Neonatal Risk Factors for Neurodevelopmental Outcome in Infants in Karaj. Arch Iran med 2009 March;12(2):135-139.
- MKC Nair, Babu G, Padmamohan J, Sunitha RM, Resmi VR et al. Developmental delay and disability among under -5 children in a rural ICDs blocks. Indian Paediatrics 2009 Jan;46:75-77.
- Aly Z, Taj F, Ibrahim S. Missed opportunities in surveillance and screening systems to detect developmental delay: A developing country perspective. J braindev 2010;32:90-97.
- Wilhelm IJ. Physical therapy assessment in early infancy. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1993. p.46-48.
- Sung IY, Kang W. Infant Neurological International Battery (INFANIB) as a Predictor of Neuromotor Outcome in Risk Infants. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med 1997 April;21(2):406-413.