Refine your search
Collections
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Andrews Milton, J.
- Effect of Different Body Positions on Manual Dexterity in Clinical Nurses
Abstract Views :395 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Senior Neuro Physiotherapist, Jaipur Golden Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, Golden Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, IN
2 Dr. M.V. Shetty College of Physiotherapy, Mangalore, Karnataka, IN
3 H.O.D., Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jaipur, IN
1 Senior Neuro Physiotherapist, Jaipur Golden Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, Golden Hospital, Rohini, New Delhi, IN
2 Dr. M.V. Shetty College of Physiotherapy, Mangalore, Karnataka, IN
3 H.O.D., Department of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Jaipur, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 6, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 108-111Abstract
Objective The main objective of this study was to determine the effect of posture on psychomotor efficiency using Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT) and to compare the effect of different postures on psychomotor efficiency using Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT). Design of Study A prospective non randomized comparative study design. Participants Healthy nurses in age group of 20-40 years. Main outcome Measures Manual dexterity was tested using Purdue Pegboard Test. Results The result showed a better dexterity in sitting position in all the four tasks (mean and standard deviation of RHT was 18.50 ± 1.872; for LHT it was 16.52 ± 1.772;for BHT it was 14.29 ± 1.415, for AT it was 39.00 ± 6.176), comparatively lesser in standing (mean and standard deviation of RHT was 17.73 ± 1.830;for LHT it was 15.82 ± 1.684, for BHT it was 13.64 ± 1.621; and for AT it was 36.38 ± 8.006) while least in waist bent position (mean and standard deviation of RHT was 16.70 ± 1.761, for LHT it was 15.16 ± 2.131; for BHT it was 12.71 ± 1.784; and for AT it was 33.57 ± 8.381). Similar results were seen for the comfort level of the positions with sitting as most comfortable and easy while waist bent position was most painful with least comfort and easy level. Conclusion The result of this study shows dexterity is strongly related with posture and its comfort ability. Change in posture produces a change in dexterity in a significant manner. Positions such as waist bent are both uncomfortable as well as provide less dexterity whereas sitting positions proves to be comfortable as well as imparts better dexterity. Thus sitting position should be considered as the preferred position wherever possible by the clinical nurses, so as to improve dexterity and perform functions skillfully.Keywords
Hand Function, Dexterity, Nurse; Posture, Purdue Pegboard Test
References
- Lynette A. Jones, Susan J. Lederman. Human hand function. Oxford University Press; 2006.
- Cristopher J. Maggs. Nursing history: The state of the art. Routledge; 1987.
- Dean Trembly. Learning to use your aptitudes. Erin Hills Publishers; 1974.
- Krunal Desai, Kirti Kene, Mita Doshi, Shubhangi More, Snehal Desai. Normative data of Purdue Pegboard on Indian population. Indian Journal of Occupational Therapy 2005;37:3.
- Jack M. Guralnik, Linda P. Fried, Eleanor M. Simonsick, Judith D. Kasper, Mary E. Lafferty. The Women’s health and ageing study: Health and social characteristics of older women with disability. DIANE Publishing; 1995.
- Raoul Tubiana. The Hand. Volume 5. 5th edition. Saunders; 1999.
- Tiffin J. The purdue pegboard: Norms and studies of reliability and validity. J Appl Psychol 1948; 32:234–47.
- Costa L., Searola L., Rapin L.Purdue pegboard scores for norman grammar school children. Perceptual and motor skills 1964; 13:748.
- R.N. Lemon. Neural control of dexterity: what has been achieved? Exp Brain Res 1999; 128:6–12.
- Jansen Jeroen P, Burdorf Alex, Van der Beek, Allard J. Lumbar posture during work among nurses and office workers and the relation to back problems: statistical analysis of angle-vs-time data. Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting Proceedings. Musculoskeletal Disorders 2006; Vol 5: 465-468(4).
- Norton L, Hignett S. Testing gloves used for common nursing tasks. Prof Nurse. 2000 Mar; 15(6):358
- Turkan Pasinlioglu. Effect of left or right handedness on nursing practice. International Journal of Neuroscience August 2003; 113;8 : 1087 – 1093.
- Charles W. Buffington, Stanley D. MacMurdo, Christopher M. Ryan. Body Position Affects Manual Dexterity. Anesth Analg 2006; 102:1879-1883.
- Rosenblum S, Josman N. The relationship between postural control and fine manual dexterity. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003; 23(4):47-60.
- Costa L., Searola L., Rapin L.Purdue pegboard scores for norman grammar school children. Perceptual and motor skills 1964; 13:748.
- Mark L. Latash, Michael T. Turvey, Nikolai Aleksandrovich Bernstein. Dexterity and its development. Routledge; 1996.
- A Comparative Study Between the Efficacies of Post Isometric Relaxation Versus Post Isometric Relaxation with TENS on Upper Trapezius Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Abstract Views :574 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Faculty of Therapeutic Sciences, Masterskill University College of Health Sciences, Selangor, Malaysia, IN
2 Dr. M.V. Shetty College of Physiotherapy & Dr. M.V. Shetty Trust hospital, Karnataka, IN
1 Faculty of Therapeutic Sciences, Masterskill University College of Health Sciences, Selangor, Malaysia, IN
2 Dr. M.V. Shetty College of Physiotherapy & Dr. M.V. Shetty Trust hospital, Karnataka, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 6, No 1 (2012), Pagination: 196-199Abstract
Background of the Study
This study to compare the efficacy of post isometric relaxation versus PIR with TENS on upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome.
Objectives
To evaluate the effectiveness of PIR and PIR with TENS on upper trapezius myofascial pain syndrome.
Methodology
Quasi – Experimental study design. The study was conducted at EMG laboratory, physiotherapy department at JKK sampoorani Ammal Trust Hospital, Komarapalayam. A total number of 20 subjects with upper trapezius MFPS was selected by purposive sampling method for duration of treatment about 1 week in the outpatient physiotherapy department. After due consideration to the inclusion criteria and they were divided into Group A & B with 10 subjects in each group. The study was conducted for a period of about 1 year.
Data Analysis
Based on the data VAS for pain and surface EMG used to analysis the effectiveness of PIR and PIR with TENS, the calculated value was greater than the tabulated t-value (P<0.05) which showed that there was stastical significant different between group B and group A.
Conclusion
This study was concluded the mean value of Group B showed that there was significant reduction of pain after the application of PIR with TENS when compared to group A.