A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Anu, Bansal
- Standardized Index of Shoulder Function: Validation of an effective Tool for Assessing Disability in Frozen Shoulder Patients
Authors
1 Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, Noida, U.P, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 7, No 4 (2013), Pagination: 7-11Abstract
Background: Various tools are available for assessing disability in upper limb musculoskeletal disorders but there is a need to find a safe, quick, condition specific and more accurate assessment tool to assess upper limb disability in frozen shoulder patients.Objective: To find a correlation in between the scores of QuickDASH-9, SPADI and F12S tools.
Methodology: In this study 60 subjects, both male and female were taken between age group (51±5.374 years) . Patients diagnosed with frozen shoulder (phase-1) were included in the study based on their orthopedic assessment and inclusion criteria. QuickDASH-9, SPADI and F12S were then administered for assessing pain and disability in these patients.
Result: Correlation was observed between SPADI, Quick DASH-9 and F12S scores at p
Interpretation and conclusion: All the 3 tools can be used to assess pain and disability in frozen shoulder patients (phase I). Quick DASH-9 is simple, quick and subjective tool based on functional activity questions and assesses disability of shoulder , arm and hand while F12S is more condition specific tool that assesses only shoulder joint and muscle pathology. F12S has both subjective and objective components. Hence it can be considered as a more specific tool for assessing disability in frozen shoulder patients.
Keywords
F12 S, Frozen Shoulder, Phase I PatientsReferences
- Rockwood CA, editor. The Shoulder. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co, 1990.
- Grubbs N. Frozen shoulder syndrome: A review of literature. JOSPT1993; 18(3):479-487.
- Walker-Bone K, Palmer KT, Reading I, Coggon D, Cooper C: Prevalence and impact of musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb in the general population. Arthritis Rheum 2004, 51:642-651.
- Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM. Shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005; 48: 298–306.
- Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand).. Am J Ind Med 1996; 29: 602–608.
- Mousavi SJ, Parnianpour M, Abedi M, et al: Cultural adaptation and validation of the Persian version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcome measure. Clin Rehabil 2008,22(8):749-757.
- Gummesson C, Atroshi I, Ekdahl C: The disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand (DASH) outcome questionnaire: longitudinal construct validity and measuring self-rated health change after surgery. Musculoskelet Disord 2003.
- C Philip Gabel, Michael Yelland et al A modified QuickDASH-9 provides a valid outcome instrument for upper limb function. Musculoskelet Disord. 2009; 10: 161.
- Bot SDM, Terwee CB,et al. Clinimetric evaluation of shoulder disability questionnaires: a systematic review of the literature. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:335–341.
- Badalanmenti S, Roubal PJ, Freeman DC, Walleman KM, Parrot A, Wiater JM. Shoulder outcome measures. A comparison of 6 functional tests. Am J Sports Med. 2004;32:1270–1277.
- Roddey TS, Olson SL,et al. Comparison of the University of California-Los Angeles Shoulder Scale and the Simple Shoulder Test with the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index: Singleadministration reliability and validity. Phys Ther. 2000;80:759–768.
- MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachkin K. The Shoulder Pain and Disability Index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7:12.
- Buchbinder R, Hoving JL, et al. Short course prednisolone for adhesive capsulitis: a randomised, double blind, placebo controlled trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63:1460–1469.
- Fayad F, Mace Y, Lefevre-Colau MM et al. Measurement of shoulder disability in the athlete: a systematic review. Ann Readapt Med Phys 2004; 47: 389–395.
- Fermanian J. Validation of assessment scales in physical medicine and rehabilitation: how are psychometric properties determined? Ann Readapt Med Phys 2005; 48: 281–287.
- Arnaud Dupeyron et al: heterogeneous assessment of shoulder disorder validation of standardized index of shoulder function. J Rehabil Med 2010; 42: 967–972.
- Bankes MJ, Crossman JE, Emery RJ. A standard method of shoulder strength measurement for the Constant score with a spring balance. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 1998; 7: 116–121.
- Mac Dermid JC, Ramos J et al. The impact of rotator cuff pathology on isometric and isokinetic strength, function, and quality of life. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004; 13: 593–598.
- Susan L Heald, Daniel L Riddleet al The Shoulder Pain and DisabilityIndex: The Construct Validity and Responsiveness of a Region-Specific Disability Measure Phys Ther. 1997; 77:1079-1089.
- J. M. WALKER,DEBBIE SUE, et al Active Mobility of the Extremities in Older Subjects Phys Ther. 1984; 64:919-923.
- Einar Kristian Tveitå, Leiv Sandvik et al Factor structure of the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index in patients with adhesive capsulitis Musculoskeletal Disorders 2008, 9:103.
- Kocher MS, Horan MP, et al. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons subjective shoulder scale in patients with shoulder instability, rotator cuff disease, and glenohumeral arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005; 87: 2006–2011.
- Bostrom C, Harms-Ringdahl K, Nordemar R. Relationships between measurements of impairment, disability, pain, and disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis patients with shoulder problems. Scand J Rheumatol 1995; 24: 352–359.
- Megan, Davidson, Janifer comparison of five low back disability questionnaires reliability and responsiveness Phys Ther 2002; 82 ;1 ; 8-24.
- Kyria Petuskey A, Anita Bagley Upper extremity kinematics during functional activities:Threedimensional studies in a normal pediatric population Gait & Posture 25 (2007) 573–579.
- Effect of Isometric Exercises and Proprioceptive Exercises in it Professionals Suffering from Sub Clinical Neck Pain
Authors
Source
Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal, Vol 8, No 1 (2014), Pagination: 43-48Abstract
Objective: To study the effects of isometric and proprioceptive exercises in IT professionals suffering from subclinical neck pain. Methodology: 30 subjects within age group of 18-40 yrs both males and females from IT companies with subclinical neck pain participated in the study. Subjects who were working for a minimum of 6 hours /day or 30 hours/ week and with the NDI score in between range of 5-14 were included in the study. Subjects were excluded if they had any other musculoskeletal, vertebro basilar insufficiency symptoms and neurological disorders, had undergone cervical spine surgery or were undergoing treatment at the time of testing. Improvements were noted on VAS score, NDI score, extensor muscle strength measurement and proprioception i.e. joint position sense. Results: Significant differences were observed within two groups i.e. group B given postural training and strength training exercises as well as group C given postural training, strength training and proprioceptive training exercises compared to group A given postural training exercises only. On intergroup analysis between groups B and C no significant difference was found. Conclusion: Strength training program with postural correction tips is equally effective as combination of strength and proprioceptive training group in improving pain, disability, muscle strength and proprioception.Keywords
Isometric Exercises, Proprioceptive Exercises, Subclinical Neck PainReferences
- Coté P, Cassidy J, Carroll L. The Saskatchewanhealth and back pain survey. The prevalence ofneck pain and related disability in Saskatchewanadults. Spine 1998; 23: 1689–1698.
- Heikkila H,Wenngren B. Cervicocephalickinesthetic sensibility, active range of cervicalmotion, and oculomotor function in patients withwhiplash injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79:1089–1094.
- Sandlund J, Djupsjöbacka M, Ryhed B, HambergJ, Björklund M. Predictive and discriminativevalue of shoulder proprioception tests forpatients with whiplash-associated disorders. JRehabil Med 2006; 38: 44–49.
- Knox JJ, Beilstein DJ, Charles SD, Aarseth GA,Rayer S, Treleaven J, Hodges PW. Changes inhead and neck position have a greater effect onelbow joint position sense in people withwhiplash-associated disorders. Clin J Pain 2006;22: 512–518
- Andersson HI, Ejlertsson G, Leden I, et al. Chronicpain in a geographically defined generalpopulation: studies of differences in age, gender,social class, and pain localization. Clin J Pain. 1993;9:174–182.
- Brattberg G, Thorslund M, Wikman A. Theprevalence of pain in a general population. Theresults of a postal survey in a country of Sweden. Pain. 1989;37:215–222.
- Mäkelä M, Heliövaara M, Sievers K, et al.Prevalence, determinants, and consequences ofchronic neck pain in Finland. Am J Epidemiol.1991;134:1356–1367.
- Picavet HSJ, Schouten JSAG. Musculoskeletalpain in the Netherlands: prevalences,consequences and risk groups, the DMC(3)-study. Pain. 2003;102:167–178.
- Lee H, Nicholson L, Adams R, Bae S-S.Proprioception and rotation range sensitizationassociated with subclinical neck pain. Spine2005; 30.
- Isabelle Paulus, PT and Simon Brumagne. AlteredInterpretation of neck proprioceptive signals inpersons with subclinical recurrent neck pain. JRehabil Med 2008; 40: 426–432
- Jull G, Falla D, Treleaven J, Hodges P, VicenzinoB Retraining cervical joint position sense: theeffect of two exercise regimes J Orthop Res. 2007Mar;25(3):404-12.
- Revel M, Minguet M, Gregoy P, Vaillant J, ManuelJL. Changes in cervicocephalic kinesthesia aftera proprioceptive rehabilitation program inpatients with neck pain: a randomized controlledstudy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994Aug;75(8):895-9.
- Per J Palmgren, Daniel Andreasson, MagnusEriksson and Andreas Hägglund Cervicocephalickinesthetic sensibility and postural balance inpatients with nontraumatic chronic neck pain – apilot study Chiropractic & Osteopathy 2009, 17:6
- Vernon H. The Neck Disability Index: patientassessment and outcome monitoring inwhiplash.J Musculoskel Pain. 1996;4:95-104.
- Vernon HT, Aker P, Aramenko M, Battershill D,Alepin A, Penner T Evaluation of neck musclestrength with a modified sphygmomanometerdynamometer: reliability and validity. JManipulative Physiol Ther. 1992 Jul-Aug;15(6):343-9
- Falla D, O’Leary S, Fagan A, Jull G. Recruitmentof the deep cervical flexor muscles during apostural-correction exercise performed in sitting. Man Ther. 2007 May;12(2):139-43
- Johnston V, Jull G, Souvlis T, Jimmieson NL. Neckmovement and muscle activity characteristics in female office workers with neck pain.Spine (PhilaPa 1976). 2008 Mar 1;33(5):555-63.
- Jung-Ho Kang, Rae-Young Park, Su-Jin Lee, Ja-Young Kim, Seo-Ra Yoon, Kwang-Ik Jung, TheEffect of The Forward Head Posture on PosturalBalance in Long Time Computer Based WorkerAnn Rehabil Med. 2012 February; 36(1): 98–104.
- Hagberg M 1984 Occupational musculoskeletalstress and disorders of the neck and shoulder: areview of possible pathophysiology. Arch OccupEnviron Health 53;269-78
- Berg HE, Berggren G, Tesch PA. Dynamic neckstrength training effect on pain and function. ArchPhys Med Rehabil 1994 June;75(6):661-5.s
- Ylinen et al. Active neck muscle training in thetreatment of chronic neck pain in women. JAMA,2003, 289; 19:2509-16.
- Kay TM, Gross A, Goldsmith CH, Rutherford S,Voth S, Hoving JL, Brønfort G, SantaguidaPL.Exercises for mechanical neck disorders.Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012 Aug 15;8
- Hudson JS, Ryan CG. Multimodal grouprehabilitation compared to usual care for patientswith chronic neck pain: a pilot study. Man Ther.2010 Dec;15(6):552-6
- Chiu TTW, Lo SK. Evaluation of cervical rangeof motion and isometric muscle strength:reliability and validity. Clinical Rehabil.2002;16:851-8
- Kisner Carolyn, Colby Lynn Allen. TherapeuticExercise: Foundations and Techniques. 5thEdition;2007: Pg. No. 466-7