Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Comparative Study on Immediate Effect of Adductor Stretch Mwm Versus Met in Subjects with Hip Adductor Tightness - Randomized Clinical Trial


Affiliations
1 II-MPT, CMP, India
2 KLE University Institute of Physiotherapy, Belgaum, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Study Design: Randomized Clinical trial.

Objective: To study and compare the effectiveness of Adductor Stretch MWM and MET on Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test in subject with hip adductor tightness.

Methods: In this study 40 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Group A (n-20) received single session of Adductor Stretch MWM on both sides. Group B (n-20) received single session MET on both sides. We measured pre-intervention and post intervention Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test. Data was analyse using t-test.

Results: The group treated with Adductor Stretch MWM showed significant improvement in Intermalleolar distance (p<0.001), Single leg hop test (p<0.001) and Star excursion balance test (p<0.001) as compared to MET group.Result showed a significant difference within the groups post intervention.

Conclusion: A single application of Adductor Stretch MWM is better as compared to MET to release hip adductor tightness, improve muscle flexibility and balance.


Keywords

Hip Adductor Tightness, Adductor Stretch Mwm, Met, Flexibility
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Holmich P. Adductor related groin pain in athletes. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 1997; 5:285–91.
  • Lovell G. The diagnosis of chronic groin pain in athletes: a review of 189 cases. Aust J Sci Med Sport 1995; 27:76–9.
  • Arnason A, Sigurdsson SB, Gudmundsson A, Holme I, Engebretsen L, Bahr R. Risk factors for injuries in football. Am J SportsMed 2004; 32:5–16.
  • Tyler TF et al; The association of hip strength and flexibility with the incidence of adductor muscle strains in professional ice hockey players. Am J Sports Med 2001; 29:124–8.
  • Mulligan B, Manual Therapy - NAGAS, SNAGS, MWMS etc, New Zealand, 6th edition, 2010; 127-128.
  • Toby Hall et al; Mulligan bent leg raise technique—a preliminary randomized trial of immediate effects after a single intervention. Manual Therapy 11 (2006); 130–135.
  • Smith M, Fryer G. A comparison of two muscle energy techniques for increasing the flexibility hamstring muscle group. J Bodyw Mov Ther. Oct2008;12(4):312 317.
  • Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, Kennedy LG, Garrett SL, Calin A. Defining spinal mobility in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The Bath AS Metrology Index (BASMI). J Rheumatol 1994; 21:1694-8.
  • Reid A, Birmingham TB, Stratford PW, Alcock GK, Griffin JR. Hop testing provides a reliable and valid outcome measure during rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Physical Therapy. 2007; 87(3): 337-349.
  • Hertel, J., Miller, S., & Denegar, C. Intratester and intertester reliability during the Star Excursion Balance Tests. Journal of Sports Rehabilitation 2000; 9: 104-116.
  • Ballantyne F, et al; The effect of muscle energy technique on hamstring extensibility: the mechanism of altered flexibility. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine. 2003; 6(2):59-63.
  • Lederman, E. (2005). The Science and Practice of Manual Therapy. (2nd edition.). Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
  • Magnusson SP, Simonsen EB, Aagaard P, Dyhre- Poulsen P, McHugh MP, Kjaer M. Mechanical and physical responses to stretching with and without preisometric contraction in human skeletal muscle. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996; 77:373-378.
  • Kutchera, W. A. & Kutchera, M. L. (1994). Osteopathic Principles in Practice (2nd edition.). Columbus Ohio: Greyden Press.
  • Fryer, G. & Ruszkowski, W. (2004). The influence of contraction duration in muscle energy technique applied to the atlanto axial joint. Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 7(2), 79 84.

Abstract Views: 929

PDF Views: 0




  • A Comparative Study on Immediate Effect of Adductor Stretch Mwm Versus Met in Subjects with Hip Adductor Tightness - Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract Views: 929  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Dharmesh Solanki
II-MPT, CMP, India
Vijay Kage
KLE University Institute of Physiotherapy, Belgaum, India

Abstract


Study Design: Randomized Clinical trial.

Objective: To study and compare the effectiveness of Adductor Stretch MWM and MET on Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test in subject with hip adductor tightness.

Methods: In this study 40 subjects who met the inclusion criteria were randomized into two groups. Group A (n-20) received single session of Adductor Stretch MWM on both sides. Group B (n-20) received single session MET on both sides. We measured pre-intervention and post intervention Intermalleolar distance, Single leg hop test and Star excursion balance test. Data was analyse using t-test.

Results: The group treated with Adductor Stretch MWM showed significant improvement in Intermalleolar distance (p<0.001), Single leg hop test (p<0.001) and Star excursion balance test (p<0.001) as compared to MET group.Result showed a significant difference within the groups post intervention.

Conclusion: A single application of Adductor Stretch MWM is better as compared to MET to release hip adductor tightness, improve muscle flexibility and balance.


Keywords


Hip Adductor Tightness, Adductor Stretch Mwm, Met, Flexibility

References