Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reliability of Modified Modified Ashworth Scale in Spastic Cerebral Palsy


Affiliations
1 Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, India
2 Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background & Objectives: In assessment of spasticity in the pediatric population, methods used in practice are ordinal scales that lack reliability. Being a recent scale, Modified Modified Ashworth Scale has not been used in pediatric population as yet. This study aimed to assess inter- and intra-rater reliability of MMAS in assessing children with spastic cerebral palsy and also compare results with those of AS and MAS.

Methods & Materials: The study included 40 children with spastic CP with mean age 7.75 yrs .Functional levels of children were classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Spasticity in wrist, elbow and knee flexors was assessed according to the AS, MAS, and MMAS.

Results: Interrater reliability and intrarater reliability of MMAS varied from moderate to good.

Conclusions & Interpretations: The MMAS is a reliable tool in assessing children with spastic CP and so are AS and MAS.


Keywords

Spasticity, Cerebral Palsy, Ashworth Scale
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • P O D Pharaoh, T Cooke, L Rosenbloom. Acquired cerebral palsy. Arch Dis Child. 1989;64:10103- 10116.

  • Carr LJ, Reddy SK, Stevens S, Blair E, Love S. Definition & classification of cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005; 47: 508-510.

  • Reddihough DS, Collins KJ. The epidemiology and causes of cerebral palsy. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy. 2003;49:7-12.

  • Gad M, Bailik, Uri Givon. Cerebral palsy: Classification and etiology. Acta Orthopaedica et Traumatologica Turcica. 2009; 43: 77-80.

  • Bax M, Tydeman C, Flodmark O. Clinical and MRI correlates of cerebral palsy: The European Cerebral Palsy study. JAMA. 2006; 296:1602-1608.

  • Singhi PD, Ray M, Suri G. Clinical spectrum of cerebral palsy in north India- an analysis of 1,000 cases. J Trop Pediatr. 2002; 48:162-166.

  • Srivastava VK, Laisram N, Srivastava RK. Cerebral Palsy. Indian Pediatr. 1992; 29:993-996.

  • Karen W Krigger. Cerebral palsy : an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2006; 73:91-100.

  • Samuel R Pierce, Richard T Lauer, Patricia A Shewokis, Joseph A Rubertone, Margo N Orlin. Test-Retest reliability of isokinetic dynamometer for the assessment of the spasticity of the knee flexors and knee extensors in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:697-702.

  • Mutlu A, Livanelioglu A, Gunel MK. Reliability of Ashworth and Modified Ashworth Scales in children with spastic cerebral palsy. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders. 2008; 9:44.

  • Ashworth B. Preliminary trial of carisoprodol in multiple sclerosis. Practitioner. 1964; 192:540-542.

  • Bohannon RW, Smith MB. Interrater reliability of modified ashworth scale for muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67:206-207.

  • Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Mousakhani A, Nouriyan A, Omidvar Z. Inter-rater reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale as a clinical tool in measurements of post-stroke elbow flexor spasticity. Neurorehabilitation. 2009; 24:225-229.

  • Kothari CR, Research Methodology; Methods and Techniques. New Age International Publishers, New Delhi, 2007.

  • Brashear A, Zafonte R, Corcoran M, Jimenez NG, Gracies JM, Williams M, Chia-Ho Lee, Turkel C. Inter- and intrarater reliability of the Ashworth Scale and the Disability Assessment Scale in patients upper-limb post-stroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002; 83:1349-1354.

  • Damiano DL, Quinlivan JM, Qwen BF, Payne P, Nelson KC, Abel MF. What does the Ashworth Scale really measure and are instrumented measures more valid and precise? Dev Med Child Neurol. 2002; 44:112-118.

  • Gregson JM, Leathley M, Moore AP, Sharma AK, Smith TL, Watkins CL. Reliability of the Tone Assessment Scale and the Modified Ashworth Scale as clinical tools for assessing post stroke spasticity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999; 80: 1013-1016.

  • Fosang AL, Galea MP, McCoy AT, Reddihough DS, Story I. Measures of muscle and joint performance in the lower limb of children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003; 45:664-670.

  • Clopton N, Dutton J, Featherston T, Grigsby A, Mobley J, Melvin J. Interrater and intrarater reliability of the modified ashworth scale in children with hypertonic. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2005; 17:268-274.

  • Ghotbi N, Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S. Measurement of lower-limb muscle spasticity: Intrarater reliability of Modified Modified Ashworth Scale. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011; 48: 83-88.

  • Fleuren JF, Voerman GE, Erren-Wolters CV, Snoek GJ, Rietman JS, Hermens HJ, Nene AV. Stop using the Ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2010; 81:46-52.

  • Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Hasson S, Fakhari Z, Mashayekhi M, Herasi M. Assessing the reliability of the Modified Modified Ashworth Scale between two physiotherapists in adult patients with hemiplegia. Neurorehabilitation. 2009;25:235-240

  • Ansari NN, Naghdi S, Moammeri H, Jalaie S. A comparative study on the inter-rater reliability of the Ashworth scales in assessment of spasticity. Acta Medica Iranica. 2006; 44:246-250.

  • Haas BM, Bergstrom E, Jamous A, Bennie A. The interrater reliability of the original and of the modified ashworth scale for the assessment of spasticity in patients with spinal cord injury. Spinal cord. 1996; 34:560-564.

  • Pandyan AD, Johnson GR, Price CIM, Curless RH, Barnes MP, Rodgers S. A review of the properties of limitations of the Ashworth and modified Ashworth scales as measures of spasticity. Clin Rehabil. 1999; 13:373-83.

  • Blackburn M, van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the modified Ashworth scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2002; 82:25-34.


Abstract Views: 708

PDF Views: 0




  • Reliability of Modified Modified Ashworth Scale in Spastic Cerebral Palsy

Abstract Views: 708  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Divya Gupta
Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University Uttar Pradesh, India
Pooja Sharma
Amity Institute of Physiotherapy, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


Background & Objectives: In assessment of spasticity in the pediatric population, methods used in practice are ordinal scales that lack reliability. Being a recent scale, Modified Modified Ashworth Scale has not been used in pediatric population as yet. This study aimed to assess inter- and intra-rater reliability of MMAS in assessing children with spastic cerebral palsy and also compare results with those of AS and MAS.

Methods & Materials: The study included 40 children with spastic CP with mean age 7.75 yrs .Functional levels of children were classified according to the Gross Motor Function Classification System. Spasticity in wrist, elbow and knee flexors was assessed according to the AS, MAS, and MMAS.

Results: Interrater reliability and intrarater reliability of MMAS varied from moderate to good.

Conclusions & Interpretations: The MMAS is a reliable tool in assessing children with spastic CP and so are AS and MAS.


Keywords


Spasticity, Cerebral Palsy, Ashworth Scale

References