Indian Journal of Physiotherapy & Occupational Therapy-An International Journal

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Interferential Current Therapy versus Narrow Band Ultraviolet B Radiation in the Treatment of Post Herpetic Neuralgia


Affiliations
1 Department of Physical therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Objective: To compare the efficacy of interferential current therapy versus narrow band ultraviolet B radiation in the treatment of post herpetic neuralgia.

Subjects: Forty nine patients suffering from distressing post herpetic neuralgia. assigned randomly into 2 groups; interferential group and narrow band ultraviolet B group. Intensity of pain was recorded before and after therapy using numerical rating scale.

Results: The results of this study showed no significant difference in pain intensity post treatment between both groups in acute and subacute neuralgia as p value > 0.05 while there was significant difference between both groups in established neuralgia as p value< 0.05.

Conclusion: The study concluded that interferential current and narrow band ultraviolet B were effective in acute and subacute neuralgia, while only interferential is effective in established neuralgia.


Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • De Benedittis G, Besana F, Lorenzetti A “A new topical treatment for acute herpetic neuralgia and post-herpetic neuralgia: the aspirin/diethyl ether mixture. An open-label study plus a double-blind controlled clinical trial”. Pain; (1992); 48 (3): 383–390.

  • Dworkin RH, Portenoy RK. Proposed classification of herpes zoster pain. Lancet 1994;343:1648.

  • Johnson RW, Whitton TL. Management of herps zoster (shingles) and postherpetic neuralgia. Expert Opin Pharmacother (2004);5:551-9.

  • Fashner J, Bell AL. Herpes zoster and postherpetic neuralgia: prevention and management. Am Fam Physician. (2011) Jun 15;83(12):1432-1437.

  • Kitchen S, Palmer S, Martin D,. Interferential current for pain control. In: KitchenS ed. Electrotherapy Evidence-based Practice. 11th ed. Edinburgh, Scotland: Churchill Livingstone; 2002:287–298.

  • EL-Ghor AA, Norval M. Biological effects of narrow-band (311nm TL01) UVB irradiation: a review. J Photochem Photobiol B 1997;38:99-106.

  • Lara-Munoz C, De Leon SP, Feinstein AR, Puente A, Wells CK: Comparison of three rating scales for measuring subjective phenomena in clinical research, Use of experimentally controlled auditory stimuli. Arch Med Res 2004, 35(1):43-48.

  • Hartrick CT, Kovan JP, Shapiro S: The numeric rating scale for clinical pain measurement: a ratio measure? Pain Pract 2003, 3(4):310-316.

  • Nabila S; Muhammad H; Faisal Y; Rukhsana B; Efficacy of interferential current on trigeminal neuralgia. 2012; NEURALGIA MC Vol. 19 - No.2; 33 – 35.

  • El-Nabarawy E. The use of narrow band ultraviolet light B in the prevention and treatment of postherpetic neuralgia (A pilot study). Indian J Dermatol;2011;56:44-7.

  • Kloth, L. Interference current. In: Clinical Electrotherapy Nelson, R.M., Currier, D.P. (Ed.) Ch 9, 183-207, Appleton and Lange, 1987. Norwalk, Connecticut, USA.

  • Watson, J. Pain mechanisms: a review. 3. Endogenous pain mechanisms Aust J. Physiother 1982, 28 (2), 38-45

  • Babu R, Murali R. “Arachnoid cyst of the cerebellopontine angle manifestingas contralateral trigeminal neuralgia: case report”, Neurosurgery 2010; Jun; 28(6): 886-7.

  • Burchiel KJ. “A new classification for facial pain”, Neurosurgery 2001; Nov; 53(5):1164-6.

  • Natarajan, M “Percutaneous trigeminal ganglion balloon compression: experience in 40 patients”. Neurology (Neurological Society of India) (2001)’;48 (4):330–2.

  • Cheing GL, Hui-Chan CW. Analgesic effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and interferential currents on heat pain in healthy subjects. J Rehabil Med. 2003 Jan;35(1):15-9.

  • Misery L. Langerhans cells in the neuron-immunocutaneous system. J Neuroimmunol 1998;89:83-7.

  • Shreedhar V, Giese T, Sung VW, Ullrich SE. A cytokine cascade including prostaglandin E2, il- 4, IL-10 is responsible for UV-induced systemic immunosuppression. J Immunol 1998;160:3783-9.

  • Schwarz T. Mechanisms of UV-induced immunosuppression. Keio J Med 2005 ; 54:165-71.

  • Jalali MH, Ansarin H, Soltani-Arabshahi R. Broadband ultraviolet B phototherapy in zoster patients may reduce the incidence and severity of postherpetic neuralgia. Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed. 2006 Oct;22(5):232-7.


Abstract Views: 427

PDF Views: 0




  • Interferential Current Therapy versus Narrow Band Ultraviolet B Radiation in the Treatment of Post Herpetic Neuralgia

Abstract Views: 427  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Intsar Salim Waked
Department of Physical therapy for Surgery, Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, Egypt

Abstract


Objective: To compare the efficacy of interferential current therapy versus narrow band ultraviolet B radiation in the treatment of post herpetic neuralgia.

Subjects: Forty nine patients suffering from distressing post herpetic neuralgia. assigned randomly into 2 groups; interferential group and narrow band ultraviolet B group. Intensity of pain was recorded before and after therapy using numerical rating scale.

Results: The results of this study showed no significant difference in pain intensity post treatment between both groups in acute and subacute neuralgia as p value > 0.05 while there was significant difference between both groups in established neuralgia as p value< 0.05.

Conclusion: The study concluded that interferential current and narrow band ultraviolet B were effective in acute and subacute neuralgia, while only interferential is effective in established neuralgia.


References