Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Comparison between Surged Faradic Current and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Myofascial Trigger Points in Trapezius


Affiliations
1 Department of Physiotherapy, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University Karad, Maharashtra, India
2 Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University Karad, Maharashtra, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Aim: To find out the effect of surged faradic current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on myofascial trigger points in trapezius

Materials and Method: The study was conducted in clinically diagnosed subjects with myofascial trigger points present in trapezius with age group 18-25 years. Total 34 subjects were include in the study .They were randomly devided into the two groups each consisting of 17 subjects .Group A include the subjects who received Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and phonoporeis and Group B include the subjects who received surged faradic current and phonophoresis .Pre treatment outcome measures were visual analogue scale, Cervical range of motion and palpation of myofascial trigger points present in the trapezius. The specific protocol was given to the patients for 2 weeks for 4 days .At the end of the 2 weeks, past treatment outcome measures were performed for range of motion and pain. Paired T-test was used to analyse within the group statistical analysis and unpaired t test used for between the group statistical analysis and sees the result.

Result: Paired t-test was used to analyze the comparison between surged faradic current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on mayofacial trigger points in trapezius. There result was extremely significant for group A and group B.

Between the group comparison the unpaired t-test was used to analyze group A and group B post treatment values and there was significant difference between outcome variables in VAS, ROM and Palpation .

Conclusion: From this conducted study it concluded that, patient who treated with surged faradic current and phonophoresis had significant improvement clinically and statistically and improved in Range of Motion (ROM), Visual analogue scale and showed reduction in myofascial trigger points with palpation. So, this study accepts the alternate hypothesis


Keywords

Myofascial Trigger Points, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Surged Faradic Current.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Dominik Irnich, Roland Gautschi, Nicolas Behrens. Myofacial trigger points Comprehensive Diagnosis and Tretment.Ed 1;2013:5-7.
  • Lucas KR, Rich PA, Polus BI. Muscle activation patterns in the scapular positioning muscles during loaded scapular plane elevation: the effect of latent mayofacial trigger points. Clinical Biomech 2010; 25(8):765-770.
  • Gemmell H, Miller P, Nordstorm H. Immediate effect of ischemic compression and trigger point pressure release on neck pain and upper trapezius trigger points: a randomized controlled trial, Clinical chiropract 2008; 11(1):30-36.
  • Hoving JL, Koes BW, Henrica CW. manual therapy, physical therapy or continued care by a general practitioner for patients with neck pain: a randomized, controlled triaal ,Annals of internal medicen 2002; 136 (10):173-722.
  • Hsurb CT, Cheng PT, Kuan ST, Hong Z. The immediate effectiveness of electrical nerve stimulation and electrical muscle stimulation in mayofacial trigger points, American Journal of Physical medicen and Rehabilitation 1997 76(6):471-476.
  • Hou CR, Chen L,et al. immidiate effect of various physical therapeutic modalities on cervical mayofacial pain and trigger point sensitivity,Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation 2002;83(10):1406-1414.
  • Ratan SK, Rattan KN. The surged faradic faradic stimulation to the pelvic floor muscle as an adjunct to the medical management in children with rectal prolapsed, BMC pediatrics;2009.
  • Sarrafzadeh J, Ahmadi A, Yassin M. The effects of pressure release phonophoresis of hydrocortisone and ultra sound on upper trapezius latent myofascial trigger point,Archives of Physical Medicen and Rehabilitation 2012;93(1):72-77.
  • Osiri M, Welch V, et,al. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for knee osteoarthritis.(Review),Cochrane Systemic review;2009.
  • Farina S, Casarotto M, Benelle M, Tinazzi M.A randomized controlled study on the effect of two different treatments(FREMS AND TENS) in myofascial pain syndrome, Europa Medicophysica 2004;40(4):293-301.

Abstract Views: 19

PDF Views: 0




  • Comparison between Surged Faradic Current and Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on Myofascial Trigger Points in Trapezius

Abstract Views: 19  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Akanksha A. Nalawade
Department of Physiotherapy, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University Karad, Maharashtra, India
Poonam H. Patil
Department of Cardiopulmonary Sciences, Krishna Institute of Medical Sciences Deemed to be University Karad, Maharashtra, India

Abstract


Aim: To find out the effect of surged faradic current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on myofascial trigger points in trapezius

Materials and Method: The study was conducted in clinically diagnosed subjects with myofascial trigger points present in trapezius with age group 18-25 years. Total 34 subjects were include in the study .They were randomly devided into the two groups each consisting of 17 subjects .Group A include the subjects who received Transcutaneous electrical stimulation and phonoporeis and Group B include the subjects who received surged faradic current and phonophoresis .Pre treatment outcome measures were visual analogue scale, Cervical range of motion and palpation of myofascial trigger points present in the trapezius. The specific protocol was given to the patients for 2 weeks for 4 days .At the end of the 2 weeks, past treatment outcome measures were performed for range of motion and pain. Paired T-test was used to analyse within the group statistical analysis and unpaired t test used for between the group statistical analysis and sees the result.

Result: Paired t-test was used to analyze the comparison between surged faradic current and transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on mayofacial trigger points in trapezius. There result was extremely significant for group A and group B.

Between the group comparison the unpaired t-test was used to analyze group A and group B post treatment values and there was significant difference between outcome variables in VAS, ROM and Palpation .

Conclusion: From this conducted study it concluded that, patient who treated with surged faradic current and phonophoresis had significant improvement clinically and statistically and improved in Range of Motion (ROM), Visual analogue scale and showed reduction in myofascial trigger points with palpation. So, this study accepts the alternate hypothesis


Keywords


Myofascial Trigger Points, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Surged Faradic Current.

References