Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Role of Human Bite Mark Identification and DNA Technology in Forensic Odontology: a Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, UP, India
2 Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, UP, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Out of the numerous fields of study and analysis in forensic odontology an important principle is the recognition and interpretation of marks and injuries produced for human bites in foods founded in crime scenes or in the human skin. Thus, the knowledge of the anatomical detail and particularities of human dentition and distribution in the dental arcs can be of real value to forensic odontologist. These bite marks are usually found over the skin, as a result of rapes, fights, assaults, abuses and child violence, this evidence can mean the crime resolution, assuming a decisive role in the criminal identification. In this direction, the DNA technology can be used in the recovery of the genetic material, through the saliva deposited in the skin, after the production of a bite mark, due to the fact that dental impression can be adulterated easily and showing problems on expert analysis. This review emphasizes the importance of the recognition and identification of these injuries combining them with the use of the DNA technology for individual identification.

Keywords

Bite Marks, DNA, Saliva
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Syrjänenn SM, Sainio P. Forensic dentistry recent development towards on independent discipline in modern dentistry. Proc Finn Dent Soc. 1990; 86: 157-70.

  • Melani RFH. Identificação por marcas de mordida. In: Silva M. Compêndio de odontologia legal. Rio de Janeiro: Medsi; 1997.

  • Ramirez AIC. Estomatologia forense. México: Trillas; 1990.

  • Sweet D, Pretty IA. A look at forensic dentistry Part 2: teeth as weapons of violence identification of bitemarks perpetrators. Br Dent J. 2001; 190: 415-8.

  • Dinkel-Junior EH, Captain MS. The use of bite mark evidence as an investigative aid. J Forensic Sci. 1974; 19: 535-47.

  • Gomes E de M, Melani RFH. O estudo das marcas de mordidas e a identificação humana. [monografia] São Paulo: Fundecto; 1999.

  • Sheasby DR, MacDonald DG. A forensic classification of distortion in human bite marks. Forensic Sci Int. 2001; 122: 75-8.

  • Pötsch L, Meyer U, Rothschild S, Schneider PM, Rittner C. Application of DNA techniques for identification using human dental pulp as a source of DNA. Int J Leg Med. 1992; 105: 139-43.

  • Remualdo VR, Oliveira RN. Potencial de análise forense do DNA de diferentes amostras biológicas. Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent. 2005; 59: 421-4.

  • Farah SB. DNA no diagnóstico das doenças humanas. In: Farah SB. DNA: segredos & mistérios. São Paulo: Sarvier; 1997. p.103-40.

  • Galante-Filho H, Figini AL, Reis AB, Jobim LF, Silva M. Identificação humana. Porto Alegre: Sagra Luzzatto; 1999.

  • Allen M, Engström AS, Meyers S, Handt O, Saldeen T, Von Haeseler et al. Mitochondrial DNA sequencing of shed hairs and saliva on robbery caps: sensivity and matching probabilities. J Forensic Sci. 1998; 43: 453-64.

  • Koh D, Ng DPK, Choo SGL, Ng V, Fu Q. Effect of storage conditions on the extraction of PCR-quality genomic DNA from saliva. Clin Chim Acta. 2004; 343: 191-4.

  • Cate T. Oral histology: development, structure and function. Saint Louis: Mosby; 1988.

  • Sweet D. Why a dentist for identification? Dent Clin North Am. 2001; 45): 237-51

  • Smith BC, Holland MM, Sweet D, DiZinno JA. DNA and the forensic odontologist. In: Bowers CM, Bell GL. Manual of forensic odontology. 3rd ed. Colorado Springs: American Society of Forensic Odontology; 1997. p.283-98.

  • Elliot TR, Rogers AH, Haverkamp JR, Gischolar_mainhuis D. Analytical pyrolysis of streptococcus salivarius as an aid to identification in bite-mark investigation. Forensic Sci Int. 1984; 26: 131-7.

  • Borgula LM, Robinson FG, Rahimi M, Chew KEK, Birchmeier KR, Owens SG et al. Isolation and genotypic comparison of oral streptococci from experimental bitemarks. J Forensic Odontostomatol. 2003; 21: 23-9.

  • Brown KA, Elliot TR, Rogers AH, Thonard JC. The survival of oral streptococci on human skin and its implication in bite mark investigation. Forensic Sci Int. 1984; 26: 193-7.

  • Rahimi M, Heng NCK, Kieser JA, Tompkins GR. Genotypic comparison of bacteria recovered from human bitemarks and teeth using arbitrarly primed PCR. Soc Appl Microbiol. 2005; 99: 1265-70.

  • Silva RHA. Atividade ilícita profissional em odontologia: análise do conhecimento de acadêmicos, magistrados e entidades promotoras de cursos de aperfeiçoamento e/ou especialização, no município de Bauru-SP [dissertação]. Bauru: FOB-USP; 2005.


Abstract Views: 296

PDF Views: 0




  • Role of Human Bite Mark Identification and DNA Technology in Forensic Odontology: a Review

Abstract Views: 296  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rohit Malik
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, UP, India
Deepankar Misra
Department of Oral Medicine and Radiology, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, UP, India
Akansha Misra
Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Institute of Dental Studies and Technology, Modinagar, UP, India

Abstract


Out of the numerous fields of study and analysis in forensic odontology an important principle is the recognition and interpretation of marks and injuries produced for human bites in foods founded in crime scenes or in the human skin. Thus, the knowledge of the anatomical detail and particularities of human dentition and distribution in the dental arcs can be of real value to forensic odontologist. These bite marks are usually found over the skin, as a result of rapes, fights, assaults, abuses and child violence, this evidence can mean the crime resolution, assuming a decisive role in the criminal identification. In this direction, the DNA technology can be used in the recovery of the genetic material, through the saliva deposited in the skin, after the production of a bite mark, due to the fact that dental impression can be adulterated easily and showing problems on expert analysis. This review emphasizes the importance of the recognition and identification of these injuries combining them with the use of the DNA technology for individual identification.

Keywords


Bite Marks, DNA, Saliva

References