Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

One Year Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk Fill Restorative Resins in Class-I Restorations


Affiliations
1 Reader, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India
2 Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SJM Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India
3 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ITS Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India
4 Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
5 Reader, Dept of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
6 Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Context: The aim of this study is to compare the one year clinical performance of three bulk fill restorative materials in posterior class I occlusal restorations. 20 patients received three class I with one of three bulkfill restorative resins. Sonicfill, Tetric Evoceram and Filtek bulkfill. All restorations were evaluated at baseline, at three, six, nine months, and one year after placement. Two calibrated examiners other than the operator were evaluated each restoration. Modified USPHS criteria was used to evaluate the restorations. The results were statistically insignificant. More studies need to be carried out and for a long period of time.

Keywords

Resin Based Composites, Bulkfill Composites, Clinical Performance.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


Abstract Views: 41

PDF Views: 0




  • One Year Clinical Evaluation of Different Bulk Fill Restorative Resins in Class-I Restorations

Abstract Views: 41  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Rashmi N. C.
Reader, Dept. of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bapuji Dental College and Hospital, Davangere, India
Anupama A.
Professor, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, SJM Dental College and Hospital, Chitradurga, Karnataka, India
Nikita Singh
Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, ITS Muradnagar, Ghaziabad, Uttar Pradesh, India

Professor and Head, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
Deepak Gupta
Reader, Dept of Oral Medicine and Radiology, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India
Ankita Sharma
Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, M.M. College of Dental Sciences and Research, Maharishi Markandeshwar (Deemed to be University), Mullana, Ambala, Haryana, India

Abstract


Context: The aim of this study is to compare the one year clinical performance of three bulk fill restorative materials in posterior class I occlusal restorations. 20 patients received three class I with one of three bulkfill restorative resins. Sonicfill, Tetric Evoceram and Filtek bulkfill. All restorations were evaluated at baseline, at three, six, nine months, and one year after placement. Two calibrated examiners other than the operator were evaluated each restoration. Modified USPHS criteria was used to evaluate the restorations. The results were statistically insignificant. More studies need to be carried out and for a long period of time.

Keywords


Resin Based Composites, Bulkfill Composites, Clinical Performance.



DOI: https://doi.org/10.37506/v11%2Fi2%2F2020%2Fijphrd%2F194799