International Journal of Nursing Education

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Quality of Work Life: A Stance from Nursing Professionals


Affiliations
1 Dept. of Management Studies, PSNA College of Engg. & Tech., Kothandaraman Nagar, Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India
2 Dept. of Management Studies, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Several factors which will affect the quality of work life (QWL) of workforces, one of which is work environment. A group of workforces that is greatly affected in QWL as a result of dynamic Changes in work environment.. This article reviews the meaning of QWL, analyses constructs of QWL based on the past research from the perspective of nursing professionals in many countries and including Canada, The constructs of QWL discussed are Health and well-being, Job security, Job satisfaction, Competence development Work life Balance. Control over work load, Nursing Leadership, Control over Nursing practice, Innovation and creativity, Support and recognition.. The article concludes that QWL from the perspective of nursing professionals is challenging both to the individuals and organizations. The implications of this meaning and constructs for future research in QWL from the perspective of nursing professionals are discussed.

Keywords

Quality of Work Life, Qwl Factors, Nurses.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Blegen M (1999). Nurses job satisfaction. A Metaanalysis of related variable. Nurse Res, 42:36-41.

  • Chan, K.B., G., Lai, Y.C., Ko, and K.W., Boey, 2000. “Work Stress Among Six Professionals Groups: The Singapore Experience”. Social Science and Medicine, 50, pp. 1415-1432.

  • Cheng, Y., I., Kawachi, E.H., Coakley, J., Schwartz, and G., Colditz, 2000. “Association between Psychosocial Work Characteristic and Health Functioning in American women: Prospective Study”. British Medical Journal, 320, pp. 1432-1436.

  • Davies, L.E., Levine, M.F. and Taylor, J.C. (1984). Defining quality of working life. Human Relations. 37(1), 81-104.

  • De Jonge, J., H., Bosma, R., Peter and J., Siegrist, 2000. “Job Strain, Effort Reward Imbalance and Employee Well Being: A large Scale Cross Sectional Study”. Social Science and Medicine, 50, pp. 1317-1327.

  • Ellis N & Pompli A 2002 Quality of working life for nurses. Commonwealth Dept of Health and Ageing. Canberra.

  • Ellis.N, Pompili A, Quality of Working Life for Nurses, Report on Qualitative Research. Health Risk Management Practice. PriceWaterhouseCoopers. Canberra: Publications Production Unit, Commonwealth Deparment of Health and Ageing; 2002. p.1-43.

  • European Agency for Safety and Health at Work, 2000. “The State of Occupational Safety in the European Union, pilot study”. Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Available: www.agency.osha.eu.int/reports [December 10, 2003,].

  • Fujigaki, Y., T., Asakura, And T., Haratani, 1994. “Work Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among Japanese Information Systems Managers”. Industrial Health, 32(4), pp. 231-238 [25] Grzywacz, J.G., and N.F., Marks, 2000.

  • Fujigaki, Y., T., Asakura, And T., Haratani, 1994. “Work Stress and Depressive Symptoms Among Japanese Information Systems Managers”. Industrial Health, 32(4), pp. 231-238.

  • Funk ti Wagnalls new international dictionary of the English language. (1995). Chicago, IL: J.G. Ferguson Publishing Company.

  • G Nasl Saraji , H Dargahi , Study of Quality of Work Life (QWL), Iranian J Publ Health, Vol. 35, No. 4, 2006, pp.8- 14.

  • Gilmartin, M. (1999). Creativity: The fuel of innovation. Nursing Administration Quarterly, 23(2),1-8.

  • Grzywacz, J.G., and N.F., Marks, 2000.” Reconceptualising the Work-Family Interface: An Ecological Perspective on the Correlates of Positive and Negative Spillover between Work and Family”. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, pp. 111-126.

  • Guna Seelan Rethinam, Maimunah Ismail “Constructs of Quality of Work Life: A Perspective of Information and Technology Professionals” European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 7, Number 1 (2008) – 58-70

  • Hackman, J.R., and G.R., Oldham, 1980. Work Redesign. Reading, M.A: Addison-Wesley.

  • Joint Commission on Accreditation of Health Care Organizations (JCAHO). (1999). Standards for pain assessment and treatment. Comprehensive accreditations manual for ambulatory care, behavioral health care, health care networks, home care, hospitals, and long-term care. Oakbrook, IL. JCAHO.

  • Karasek, R., and T., Theorell, 1991. “Healthy Work Stress, Productivity, and the Reconstruction of Working Life”. New York: Basic Books

  • Knox S, Irving JA (1997). Interactive quality of work life model applied to organization. Jona, 271:39-47.

  • Kruger P (2002). Organization predictors of job satisfaction findings from Canadian mul tisided quality of work life cross-sectional survey. BMC Health Services Research, 2(6):1-12.

  • Lau, T., Y.H., Wong, K.F., Chan, and M., Law, “Information Technology and the Work Environment- Does it Change the Way People Interact at Work”. Human Systems Management,20(3), pp. 267-280.

  • Lawler E. E., LLL, 1982. “Strategies for Improving the Quality of Work Life”. American Psychologist, 37, pp. 486-693.

  • Lewis, S. 1997. “An International Perspective on Work- Family Issues”. In: S. Parasuraman and J.H. Greenhaus eds Integrating Work and Family: Challenges and Choices for a Changing World. Westport, CN: Quorum Books.

  • Maimunah Ismail, Guna Seelan Rethinam(2008), Constructs of Quality of Work Life: A Perspective of Information and Technology Professionals, European Journal of Social Sciences – Volume 7, Number 1 (2008) pp 58 – 70.

  • Mirvis, P.H. and Lawler, E.E. (1984) Accounting for the Quality of Work Life. Journal of Occupational Behaviour. 5. 197-212.

  • Nadler, D.A. and Lawler,E.E. III. (1983). Quality of Work Life: Perspectives and directions. Organizational Dynamics, Winter.

  • Reconceptualising the Work-Family Interface: An Ecological Perspective on the Correlates of Positive and Negative Spillover between Work and Family”. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 5, pp. 111-126. [26] Hackman, J.R., and G.R., Oldham, 1980. Work Redesign. Reading, M.A: Addison-Wesley

  • Rethinam, G. S., I., Maimunah, A.H., Musa, and A.S., Bahaman, 2004 “Working Conditions and Predictors of Quality of Work Life: A Psychosocial Perspective of Malaysian Information System Personnel”, In: Proceedings of the 3rd Asian Conference of the Academy of HRD, Nov. 20-23, 2004, Seoul, Korea, pp. 98-105.

  • Serey, T.T., 2006. “Choosing a Robust Quality of Work Life”. Business Forum, 27(2), pp. 7

  • Serey, T.T., 2006. “Choosing a Robust Quality of Work Life”. Business Forum, 27(2), pp. 7- 10.

  • Sirgy, M. J., Efraty,, D., Siegel, P & Lee, D. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QoWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55, 241-302.

  • Suttle, J.L., 1977. “Improving Life at Work: Problem and Prospects”. In H.R. Hackman and J.L Suttle eds Improving Life at Work: Behavioural Science approaches to organizational change (pp. 1-29). Santa Barbara, CA: Goodyear.

  • Swanson, W., K.G., Power, and R.J., Simpson, 1998. “Occupational Stress and Family Life: A comparison of Male and Female Doctors. Journal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 71, pp. 237-60.

  • Walton, R.E. (1975). Criteria for quality of working life. In Davis, L.E. and Cherns, A.B. (eds.). The quality of working life. Volume 1: Problems, Prospects and thestate of the art. New York: The Free Press.

  • Watson R et al (2003), Perceptions of nursing: a study involving nurses, nursing students and non-nursing students, International Journal of Studies 40, 133-144,

  • Watson, I., J., Buchanan, I., Campbell, and C., Briggs, 2003. “Fragmented Futures: New Challenges In Working Life”. Sydney, New South Wales: The Federation Press.

  • Yoder L (1995). Staff nurses career development relationships and self- reports of professionalism, job satisfaction, and intent to stay. Nurse Res, 44(5):290- 97.

  • Web www.ewon.com.au

  • www.bc.edu/centers/cwf/research/publications/ metaelements/ pdf/workload_pp.pdf

  • www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurse

  • www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nurse_practitioner

  • www.exasoncologymidland.com/services/informationglossary. asp

  • www.montevideomedical.com/Pages/Page_05.htm.

  • www.mywhatever.com/cifwriter/library/66/4620.html

  • www.Wikipedia.com

  • www.wordnet.princeton.edu/perl/webwn

  • http://www.oecd.org


Abstract Views: 815

PDF Views: 0




  • Quality of Work Life: A Stance from Nursing Professionals

Abstract Views: 815  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. Jayaraman
Dept. of Management Studies, PSNA College of Engg. & Tech., Kothandaraman Nagar, Dindigul, Tamilnadu, India
C. Chandran
Dept. of Management Studies, Madurai Kamaraj University, Madurai, India

Abstract


Several factors which will affect the quality of work life (QWL) of workforces, one of which is work environment. A group of workforces that is greatly affected in QWL as a result of dynamic Changes in work environment.. This article reviews the meaning of QWL, analyses constructs of QWL based on the past research from the perspective of nursing professionals in many countries and including Canada, The constructs of QWL discussed are Health and well-being, Job security, Job satisfaction, Competence development Work life Balance. Control over work load, Nursing Leadership, Control over Nursing practice, Innovation and creativity, Support and recognition.. The article concludes that QWL from the perspective of nursing professionals is challenging both to the individuals and organizations. The implications of this meaning and constructs for future research in QWL from the perspective of nursing professionals are discussed.

Keywords


Quality of Work Life, Qwl Factors, Nurses.

References