Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Nursing Student’s Perceptions on Formative Assessment Procedures and its Effects on Midwifery Module Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study among Diploma Nursing Students in Tanzania


Affiliations
1 College of health Science, The University of Dodoma, Tanzania, United Republic of
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Background: The issue of low performance among student nurses is still a challenge in theoretical and clinical practice, insufficient use of formative assessment is among the contribution factors.

Objective: Assessment of nursing students’ perceptions on formative assessment procedures and its effect on midwifery subject performance.

Method: A Cross-sectional study of 430, third year Diploma Nursing Students’ from seven nursing schools was conducted in Kilimanjaro, Dodoma, and Morogoro regions. The approach was quantitative and a sample size was calculated and obtained using simple random sampling technique. Students’ perception was measured by 18 questions from the tool adopted and modified from Vaessen(1), performance of students was reviewed and recorded using NACTE form No. 3. Descriptive and Principal Component Analysis used to analyze data of this study.

Results: Out of 430 respondents of this study, 221 (51.4%) had positive perception on formative assessment procedures. Also out of 430 respondents, 226(53%) had high performance in midwifery II module with the mean score of 69.85%. Moreover, the association between students perception and performance on midwifery module was not statistically significant(X2 = 0.027, p= 0.870)

Conclusion: Majority of students’ reported positive perception on formative assessment; however, there were no association between perception and actual midwifery module performance, yet, students with positive perception performed high than those with negative perception.


Keywords

Formative Assessment, Students Perception, Performance, Midwifery Module.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Vaessen BE, Beemt A Van Den, Watering G Van De, Ludo W, Meeuwen V, Lemmens L, et al., Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education Students ’ perception of frequent assessments and its relation to motivation and grades in a statistics course : a pilot study. 2016;2938(July).
  • Wiliam D. Assessment for learning: meeting the challenge of implementation. Assess Educ Princ Policy Pract [Internet]. 2018;25(6):682–5. Available from: http://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2017.1401526
  • Ravitch D, Stoehr LA. The Death and Life of the Great American School System. Early Learn. 2018;125–8.
  • Holland C. Critical review : medical students ’ motivation after failure. Adv Heal Sci Educ. 2015;
  • Kapur R. Factors Influencing the Student ’ s Academic Performance in Secondary Schools in India. 2018;
  • Guskey TR. Formative Classroom Assessment and Benjamin S . Bloom : Theory, Research, and Implications. 2005;(April).
  • Wiliam D. Embedded Formative Assessment Chapter 1–Why Educational Achievement Matters. 2011; Available from: www.themainidea.net
  • Duers LE, Brown N. An exploration of student nurses’ experiences of formative assessment. Nurse Educ Today [Internet]. 2009;29(6):654–9. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2009.02.007
  • U S . Department of Education. Southeast Comprehensive Center. Brie ng Paper Using Formative Assessment to Improve Student Achievement in the Core Content Areas. 2012;(January):1–11.
  • Nicol D, MacFarlane-Dick D. Formative assessment and selfregulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Stud High Educ. 2006;31(2):199–218.
  • Mbalamula YS. Effect of Group versus Individual Assessments on Coursework among Undergraduates in Tanzania : Implications for Continuous Assessments in Universities. 2018;3(1):1–8.
  • Masenga. ASSESMENT OF THE FACTORS INFLUENCING LOW ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE IN FINAL NURSING EXAMINATIONS: A CASE OF CERTIFICATE AND DIPLOMA PROGRMMES IN EASTERN ZONE, TANZANIA HAPPY. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2015;119(3):859{textendash}867.
  • Gemuhay HM, Kalolo A, Mirisho R, Chipwaza B, Nyangena E. Factors Affecting Performance in Clinical Practice among Preservice Diploma Nursing Students in Northern Tanzania. 2019;2019.
  • Dinho AE, Swai E. Tutor ’ s Clinical Knowledge, Attitude and Teaching Strategies in Nursing Schools of Mwanza Region–. 2017;1(3).
  • Ozan et al 2018. The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson,. 2018;(October 2016):85–118.
  • Al-wassia R, Hamed O, Al-wassia H, Alafari R, Jamjoom R. Cultural challenges to implementation of formative assessment in Saudi Arabia : An exploratory study. 2015;0554694661:9–20.
  • Mkony CA, Mbembati NA, Hamudu NA, Pallangyo K. Introduction of Regular Formative Assessment to Enhance Learnning for Clinical Students at Muhimbili University College, Tanzania. 2007;1‑6.
  • NACTE. Procedures for Assessment Conducted by NACTE and Autonomous Technical Institutions. 2016;(July).
  • Taras M. Summative and formative assessment: Perceptions and realities. Act Learn High Educ. 2008;9(2):172–92.

Abstract Views: 36

PDF Views: 0




  • Nursing Student’s Perceptions on Formative Assessment Procedures and its Effects on Midwifery Module Performance: A Cross-Sectional Study among Diploma Nursing Students in Tanzania

Abstract Views: 36  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Yuster C. Makule
College of health Science, The University of Dodoma, Tanzania, United Republic of
Stephen M. Kibusi
College of health Science, The University of Dodoma, Tanzania, United Republic of

Abstract


Background: The issue of low performance among student nurses is still a challenge in theoretical and clinical practice, insufficient use of formative assessment is among the contribution factors.

Objective: Assessment of nursing students’ perceptions on formative assessment procedures and its effect on midwifery subject performance.

Method: A Cross-sectional study of 430, third year Diploma Nursing Students’ from seven nursing schools was conducted in Kilimanjaro, Dodoma, and Morogoro regions. The approach was quantitative and a sample size was calculated and obtained using simple random sampling technique. Students’ perception was measured by 18 questions from the tool adopted and modified from Vaessen(1), performance of students was reviewed and recorded using NACTE form No. 3. Descriptive and Principal Component Analysis used to analyze data of this study.

Results: Out of 430 respondents of this study, 221 (51.4%) had positive perception on formative assessment procedures. Also out of 430 respondents, 226(53%) had high performance in midwifery II module with the mean score of 69.85%. Moreover, the association between students perception and performance on midwifery module was not statistically significant(X2 = 0.027, p= 0.870)

Conclusion: Majority of students’ reported positive perception on formative assessment; however, there were no association between perception and actual midwifery module performance, yet, students with positive perception performed high than those with negative perception.


Keywords


Formative Assessment, Students Perception, Performance, Midwifery Module.

References