Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

An Exploration of Academic Leadership Dynamics:A Literature Review


Affiliations
1 Oman College of Management & Technology, Oman
2 Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


India is the second most populous country in the world, with over 133.92 crores people (2017), more than a sixth of the world’s population. Already containing 17.5% of the world’s population, India is projected to be the world’s most populous country by 2022, surpassing China, its population reaching 1.6 billion by 2050. Its population growth rate is 1.7%, ranking 95th in the world in 2017. India has more than 45% of its population below the age of 25 years. There is solid evidence from all over the country for this increasing appetite for education across all social groups and across all income groups. Academic leadership is the one who can fulfil this appetite of the masses. Present research work tries to analyse the dynamics of academic leadership in the country and focus on essential traits required for academic leadership for fulfilling the long term observe of the nation. The study conducted based upon the data collected from the literatures and from other multiple secondary sources of evidence. The study signifies that academic leadership has become larger and more central for the development of qualities of higher education in the country. Universities need to be consciously and explicitly managing the processes associated with the creation of academic leadership with their knowledge assets and to recognise the value of their intellectual capital to their continuing role in society and in a wider global marketplace for higher education.

Keywords

Academic Leadership, Higher Education, Global Marketplace, Intellectual Capital, Leadership Traits, etc.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ahmed, A. M., Yang, J. B., & Dale, B. G. (2003). Self – Assessment methodology: The route to business excellence. Quality Management Journal, 10(1).
  • Akhter, I., & Haque, S. M. (2012). In search of academic excellence by becoming an effective leader: A study of academic leadership in higher education. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 12(10).
  • Brusoni, M., Damian, R., Sauri, J. G., Jakson, S., Komurcugil, H., Malmedy, M., . . . Zobel, L. (2014). The concept of excellence in higher education. ISBN 978-952-5539-73-8 (web publication) ISSN 1458-1051.
  • Burns, A. (2010) Action research: What’s in it for teachers and institutions? International House Journal, 29, 36.
  • Castillo, R. (2014). A paradigm shift to outcomes-based higher education: Policies, principles and preparations. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 14(1), 174–186.
  • Davis, M. H. (2003). Outcomes based education. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 30(3), 227–232. Retrieved from http://www.utpjournals.com/jvme/tocs/303/258.pdf
  • Eid, F. H. (2014). Higher education council, Kingdom of Bahrain, research, higher education and quality of teaching: Inquiry in Japanese academic context. Research in Higher Education Journal, 24.
  • Elton, L. (1998) Dimensions of Excellence in University Teaching. International Journal of Academic Development, 3(1), 3–11.
  • European Association for Quality Assurance. (2012). Quality procedures in the european higher education area and beyond – Vision for the future. ENQA, Brussels. Retrieved from http://www.eu/indirme/papers-and-reports/occasional-papers/ENQA_op18.pdf
  • Furst-Bowe, J. A., & Bauer, R. A. (2007). Application of the Baldrige model for innovation in higher education. New Directions for Higher Education, 137, 5–14.
  • Gibbs, G. (2008). Conceptions of teaching excellence underlying teaching award schemes. York: The Higher Education Academy.
  • Gibbs, G. (2010). Dimensions of quality, the higher education academy, YorkGordon, G. D., Andrea, V., Gosling, D., & Stefani, L. (2003). Building Capacity for Change: Research on the scholarship of teaching. Higher Education Funding Council for England, Bristol. Retrieved from http://www.hefce.ac.uk/pubs/rdreports/2003/rd02_03
  • Harden, R., Crosby, J., & Davis, M. (1999). An introduction to outcome – Based Education. Medical Teacher, 21(1), 7–14. Retrieved from http://deu.edu.tr/UploadedFiles/Birimles/16781RMHARDEN(Out comebasededucation)MAKALE.pdf
  • Higher Education, Funding Council for England (2012), http://www.ref.ac.uk/
  • International Bureau of Education (IBE) and International Bureau of Education and national Institute for Educational Research of japan – NIER. (1995). Final report of the international meeting for educational reform and educational research: New challenges in linking research, information and decision making, 4–14 September 1995, Tokyo, Japan.
  • Killen, R. (2000). Outcome – Based Education: Principles and possibilities. Unpublished manuscript, University of Newcastle, Australia. Retrieved from http://drjj.uitm.edu.my/DRJJ/CONFERENCE/UPSI/OBEKillen.pdf
  • Leithwood, K., Louis, K. S., Anderson, S., & Wahlstrom, K. (2004). How leadership influences Student Learning, University of Minnesota, Center of Applied Research and Educational Improvement. University of Toronto, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education Commissioned by The Wallace Foundation. Retrieved from www.learningfromleadership.umn.edu.
  • Musicians Union. (2013). Retrieved from http://www.musiciansunion.org.uk/new/2013/06/07/learning-for-life-conservatiore-stdents/
  • Reperes. (2012). A passion of excellence in higher education in Germany, Spain and France, Campus France. Retrieved from http://ressources.campusfrance.org/publi_institu/agence_cf/reperes/fr/reperes_14_fr.pdf
  • Romani, V. (2009). The politics of higher education in the middle east: Problem and prospects. Brandeis University, pp. 1–8, May 2009, 36. Retrieved from www.brandeis.edu/crown
  • Ruben, B. D. (2007). Excellence in Higher Education Guide, an integrated approach to assessment, planning, and improvement in colleges and Universities, National Association of College and University Business Officers. Washington, DC.
  • Ryan, T. (2015). Quality assurance in higher education: A review of Literature. Academic Quality and Accreditation, Laureate Education, Inc. Submitted: August 24, 2015, Peer-reviewed: November 29, 2015, Editor-reviewed: December 26, 2015, Published December 31, 2015, Updated: January 20, 2016, Volume 5.
  • Sappey, J., & Relf, S. (2010). Charles Sturt university, digital technology education and its impact on traditional academic roles and practice. Journal of University Teaching & Learning Practice, 7(1).
  • Skelton, A. (2007). Understanding teacher excellence in higher education. Journal of Educational Technology, 38(1), 171–183.
  • Spady, W. G., & Marshall, K. J. (1991). Beyond Traditional Outcome – Based Education. Educational Leadership, 49(2), 67–72. Retrieved from http://www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf?journals/ed_ lead/el_199110_spady.pdf
  • Stewart, V. (2011). Raising teacher quality around the world. Educational Leadership, 68(4), 16–20. December 2010–January 2011, ASCD: USA.
  • Tariq Zafar, S. M. (2018). Steps to improve quality and ranking of higher educational institutions, Quality Assurance Presentation at Oman Collage of Management and Technology, Sultanate of Oman.
  • Tariq Zafar, S. M., Ajmi, Q. A., Chuabey, D. S., & Salando, J. B. (2018). Analyzing leadership style to become a legend leader: An exploration. International Journal of Engineering and Management Research, 8(3), ISSN (Online) 2250-0758, ISSN (Print): 2394-6962. doi:10.31033/ijemr.8.3.6, www.ijemr.net
  • Wallace, M. J. (2006). Action research for language teachers (10th ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Abstract Views: 331

PDF Views: 0




  • An Exploration of Academic Leadership Dynamics:A Literature Review

Abstract Views: 331  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

S. M. Tariq Zafar
Oman College of Management & Technology, Oman
Waleed Hmedat
Oman College of Management & Technology, Oman
D. S. Chaubey
Uttaranchal University, Dehradun, Uttarakhand, India
Abdul Rehman
Oman College of Management & Technology, Oman

Abstract


India is the second most populous country in the world, with over 133.92 crores people (2017), more than a sixth of the world’s population. Already containing 17.5% of the world’s population, India is projected to be the world’s most populous country by 2022, surpassing China, its population reaching 1.6 billion by 2050. Its population growth rate is 1.7%, ranking 95th in the world in 2017. India has more than 45% of its population below the age of 25 years. There is solid evidence from all over the country for this increasing appetite for education across all social groups and across all income groups. Academic leadership is the one who can fulfil this appetite of the masses. Present research work tries to analyse the dynamics of academic leadership in the country and focus on essential traits required for academic leadership for fulfilling the long term observe of the nation. The study conducted based upon the data collected from the literatures and from other multiple secondary sources of evidence. The study signifies that academic leadership has become larger and more central for the development of qualities of higher education in the country. Universities need to be consciously and explicitly managing the processes associated with the creation of academic leadership with their knowledge assets and to recognise the value of their intellectual capital to their continuing role in society and in a wider global marketplace for higher education.

Keywords


Academic Leadership, Higher Education, Global Marketplace, Intellectual Capital, Leadership Traits, etc.

References