Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sengupta, Mousumi
- Benefits of Peer Learning:A Study Among the Post-Graduate Management Students in Karnataka
Abstract Views :352 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 SDM Institute for Management Development, Mysore, Karnataka, IN
1 SDM Institute for Management Development, Mysore, Karnataka, IN
Source
International Journal of Knowledge Management and Practices, Vol 6, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 13-20Abstract
Peer learning is a teaching pedagogy wherein students learn from each other by engaging and participating in activities together, without the presence of any implied authority body. This provides an excellent opportunity to the students to self-learn and transmit the available information among peer level. Therefore, it is only natural to welcome a shift in paradigm from the highly teacher-centred to learnercentred education (e.g. peer learning), especially in the field of management education wherein students are expected to take a greater initiative and responsibility to manage their own learning process at a workplace. For the purpose of the present study, the opinion of the post-graduate management students on the peer-learning pedagogy was collected, by administering a questionnaire. Data revealed that the opinion of the students on the benefits of peer learning could be explained by total four factors, such as, Learning in groups, Co-operative Learning, Learning responsiveness, and Enhanced performance. Students felt that peer learning was most beneficial for promoting the understanding of the subjects. Also, students felt that they were least benefitted by peer learning, in terms of the benefits they got from peers’ strength.Keywords
Peer Learning, Learning in Groups, Co-Operative Learning, Learning Responsiveness, Enhanced Performance.
References
- American Psychological Association (2013). Glossary of psychological terms. Apa.org. Retrieved on 13.8. 2014.
- Benkler, Y., & Nissenbaum, H. (2006). Commons-based peer production and virtue (PDF). Journal of Political Philosophy, 14(4), 394-419. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9760.2006.00235.x
- Bohuijs, P. A. J. (1998). The Teacher and Self-Directed Learners’. In Jolly, B. & Rees, L. (Ed.), Medical Education in the Millennium. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 192-198.
- Boud, D. (2001). Introduction: Making the Move to Peer Learning. In Boud, D., Cohen, Ruth & Sampson, Jane (Ed.). Peer Learning in Higher Education: Learning From & With Each Other. London: Kogan Page Ltd, 1-17.
- Brookfield, S. D. (1987). Developing critical thinkers. Jossey-Bass, San Franciso.
- Corneli, J., & Danoff, C. (2012). Paragogy. Pub Dom Ed Press. ISBN 978-0-9855722-0-4.
- Dehghani, M. R., Amini, M., Kojuri, J., & Nabeiei, P. (2014). Evaluation of the efficacy of peer-learning method in nutrition students of Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2(6), 2014 to 2018. Retrieved from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4235552/
- Guilmette, J. H. (2009). Power of peer learning: Networks and development cooperation. IDRC, Ottawa, ON, CA.
- http://www.clomedia.com/2017/04/13/9-strategies-make-peer-learning-program-thrive, accessed on 1.4.2018
- Brazil, J. (2011, May 23). P2PU: Learning for Everyone, by Everyone, about almost Anything.
- Landis, R. B. (2000). Academic Success Strategies. In studying engineering: A road map to a rewarding career (2nd ed.). Los Angeles: Discovery Press.
- Meyers, C., & Jones, T. B. (1993). Promoting active learning strategies for the college classroom. San Fracncisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Smith, R. M. (1983). Learning how to learn. U.K.: Buckingham Open University Press.
- Young, J. (2008). When Professors Print Their Own Diplomas. Chronicle of Higher Education, 25 September.