Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Empirical Exploration of Preferred Collaborative Knowledge-Sharing Practices in Indian Private Academia


Affiliations
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Management, IBM, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The purpose of this study is to empirically explore the best performance indicator pair of collaborative knowledge sharing practices which are segregated on the basis of gender and which are more concerned with organizational effectiveness. These performance indicators are Work culture, Interaction, Willingness to share, Recognition and Information technology.

Methodology/approach/design - This research used a sample of 206 management and technical academicians employed in private technical colleges and universities in NCR (National Capital Region) with the help of simple random sampling. Almost 68% of the respondents were males and 32% of respondents were females with an average tenure of 5.25 years in the present organization. Simple t-test and Levene’s test were used to identify variance and paired Z test was used to find the best performance indicator between the male and female academicians which encouraged collaborative knowledge sharing among them.

Findings - From the analysis, it was observed that out of the five performance indicators, male academicians believed that Recognition indicator was the most appropriate, i.e., they believed that academic institute should symbolically recognize, i.e., either through their websites or various media platforms those academicians who significantly contribute towards collaborative knowledge sharing. In the case of female academicians, Interaction performance indicator was the most significant implying that open and healthy work culture supported a healthy Interaction among the colleagues which promoted innovative ideas for enhancing organizational learning.

Research implications/limitations - The findings were based on data from one country’s specific region. Further exploration of the impact of these performance indicators can be assessed in other set-ups for better understanding. Practical implications - Utilization of knowledge gained through various collaborative knowledge sharing practices can be fruitfully used for increasing organizational effectiveness, which are reflected by the given performance indicators.

Originality/value - In this study, the author tried to bring an original empirical work for better understanding and valuable help to the body of knowledge, which can be further beneficial for organizational effectiveness.


Keywords

Collaborative Knowledge Sharing, Work Culture, Interaction, Willingness to Share, Information Technology, Recognition.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Bhusry, M., Ranjan, J., & Nagar, R. (2011). Implementing knowledge management in higher educational institutions in India: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Computer Applications, 29(1), 34-46.
  • Bock, G. W., & Kim, Y. G. (2002). Breaking the myths of rewards: An exploratory study of attitudes about knowledge sharing. Information Resources Management Journal (IRMJ), 15(2), 14-21.
  • Bock, G. W., Zmud, R. W., Kim, Y. G., & Lee, J. N. (2005). Behavioral intention formation in knowledge sharing: Examining the roles of extrinsic motivators, social-psychological factors, and organizational climate. MIS Quarterly, 29(1), 87-111.
  • Bouthillier, F., & Shearer, K. (2002). Understanding knowledge management and information management: The need for an empirical perspective. Information Research, 8(1).
  • Cabrera, A., Collins, W. C., & Salgado, J. F. (2006). Determinants of individual engagement in knowledge sharing. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 17(2), 245-264.
  • Casimir, G., Lee, K., & Loon, M. (2012). Knowledge sharing: Influences of trust, commitment and cost. Journal of Knowledge Management, 16(5), 740-753.
  • Cesareni, D., Cacciamani, S., & Fujita, N. (2016). Role taking and knowledge building in a blended university course. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 11(1), 9-39.
  • Chai, S., Das, S., & Rao, H. R. (2011). Factors affecting bloggers’ knowledge sharing: An investigation across gender. Journal of Management Information Systems, 28(3), 309-342.
  • Chang, C. L. H., & Lin, T. C. (2015). The role of organizational culture in the knowledge management process. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(3), 433-455.
  • Chen, B., Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (2015). Advancing knowledge-building discourse through judgments of promising ideas. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 10(4), 345-366.
  • Constant, D., Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1994). What’s mine is ours, or is it? A study of attitudes about information sharing. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 400-421.
  • Cranfield, D. J., & Taylor, J. (2008). Knowledge management and higher education: A UK case study. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 6(2), 85-100.
  • De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(4), 113-127.
  • Israilidis, J., Siachou, E., Cooke, L., & Lock, R. (2015). Individual variables with an impact on knowledge sharing: The critical role of employees’ ignorance. Journal of Knowledge Management, 19(6), 1109-1123.
  • Janz, B. D., & Prasarnphanich, P. (2003). Understanding the antecedents of effective knowledge management: The
  • importance of a knowledge-centered culture. Decision Sciences, 34(2), 351-384.
  • Jill, A. W. C. W. C., McKinnon, L., & Harrison, G. L. (2003). Organizational cultural: Association with commitment, job satisfaction, propensity to remain, and information sharing in Taiwan. Journal of Development Studies, 39(6), 1-22.
  • Kekwaletswe, R. M. (2012). Knowledge sharing in a learning management system environment using social awareness (Chapter 2). In Higher education institutions and learning management systems: Adoption and standardization (pp. 28-49). IGI Global.
  • Khalid, A., & Ahmed, M. (2015). Impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning: Moderating effect of organizational leadership. Asian Journal of Management Research, 5(3), 358-371.
  • Lin, H. F. (2007). Knowledge sharing and firm innovation capability: An empirical study. International Journal of Manpower, 28(3/4), 315-332.
  • Menkhoff, T., Chay, Y. W., Evers, H. D., & Loh, B. (2007). Leadership in knowledge sharing: Creating value through collaboration. Journal of Asian Business, 22(2), 265.
  • Osman, S., Kamal, S. N. I. M., Ali, M. N., Noor, J. M. M., WahiAnuar, M. A., & Othman, R. (2015). Mechanisms of knowledge sharing among undergraduate students in UiTM Johor. Procedia Economics and Finance, 31, 903-908.
  • Panahi, S., Watson, J., & Partridge, H. (2016). Information encountering on social media and tacit knowledge sharing. Journal of Information Science, 42(4), 539-550.
  • Rasula, J., Vuksic, V. B., & Stemberger, M. I. (2012). The impact of knowledge management on organisational performance. Economic and Business Review for Central and South-Eastern Europe, 14(2), 147.
  • Sawng, Y. W., Kim, S. H., & Han, H. S. (2006). R&D group characteristics and knowledge management activities: A comparison between ventures and large firms. International Journal of Technology Management, 35(1-4), 241-261.
  • Schulz, M. (2001). The uncertain relevance of newness: Organizational learning and knowledge flows. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 661-681.
  • Sita Nirmala Kumaraswamy, K., & Chitale, C. M. (2012). Collaborative knowledge sharing strategy to enhance organizational learning. Journal of Management Development, 31(3), 308-322.
  • Starbuck, W. H. (1992). Learning by knowledge-intensive firms. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 713-740.
  • Sulisworo, D. (2012). Enabling ICT and knowledge management to enhance competitiveness of higher education institutions. International Journal of Education, 4(1), 112-121.
  • Wang, S., & Noe, R. A. (2010). Knowledge sharing: A review and directions for future research. Human Resource Management Review, 20(2), 115-131.
  • Witherspoon, C. L., Bergner, J., Cockrell, C., & Stone, D. N. (2013). Antecedents of organizational knowledge sharing: A meta-analysis and critique. Journal of Knowledge Management, 17(2), 250-277.
  • Yang, J. T. (2007). The impact of knowledge sharing on organizational learning and effectiveness. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(2), 83-90.

Abstract Views: 38

PDF Views: 0




  • Empirical Exploration of Preferred Collaborative Knowledge-Sharing Practices in Indian Private Academia

Abstract Views: 38  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Sushmita Goswami
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, IBM, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India
Brijesh Kishore Goswami
Assistant Professor, Department of Management, IBM, GLA University, Mathura, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract


The purpose of this study is to empirically explore the best performance indicator pair of collaborative knowledge sharing practices which are segregated on the basis of gender and which are more concerned with organizational effectiveness. These performance indicators are Work culture, Interaction, Willingness to share, Recognition and Information technology.

Methodology/approach/design - This research used a sample of 206 management and technical academicians employed in private technical colleges and universities in NCR (National Capital Region) with the help of simple random sampling. Almost 68% of the respondents were males and 32% of respondents were females with an average tenure of 5.25 years in the present organization. Simple t-test and Levene’s test were used to identify variance and paired Z test was used to find the best performance indicator between the male and female academicians which encouraged collaborative knowledge sharing among them.

Findings - From the analysis, it was observed that out of the five performance indicators, male academicians believed that Recognition indicator was the most appropriate, i.e., they believed that academic institute should symbolically recognize, i.e., either through their websites or various media platforms those academicians who significantly contribute towards collaborative knowledge sharing. In the case of female academicians, Interaction performance indicator was the most significant implying that open and healthy work culture supported a healthy Interaction among the colleagues which promoted innovative ideas for enhancing organizational learning.

Research implications/limitations - The findings were based on data from one country’s specific region. Further exploration of the impact of these performance indicators can be assessed in other set-ups for better understanding. Practical implications - Utilization of knowledge gained through various collaborative knowledge sharing practices can be fruitfully used for increasing organizational effectiveness, which are reflected by the given performance indicators.

Originality/value - In this study, the author tried to bring an original empirical work for better understanding and valuable help to the body of knowledge, which can be further beneficial for organizational effectiveness.


Keywords


Collaborative Knowledge Sharing, Work Culture, Interaction, Willingness to Share, Information Technology, Recognition.

References