Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
Year
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Alok, Kumar
- Organizational Learning: Trends in the Social Construction of a Field
Abstract Views :354 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna 800001, IN
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna 800001, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 48, No 2 (2012), Pagination: 247-258Abstract
Organizational learning literature offers considerable choices to prospective researchers. Some of the choices are as fundamental as the 'what', 'how' and 'why' of learning. As there are little theories to anchor, it is left to the researchers to socially construct and reconstruct the fragmented field. This paper studies the empirical research published in the top 10 journals during 2000- 2010 and identifies the areas of convergence. Researchers considerably agree on using agentic perspective on learning and organization as the level of analysis. Much agreement exists on the use of exploration-exploitation framework of learning, quantitative methodologies, and longitudinal designs. Strategy has emerged as the most prolific contributor to the organizational learning research.
References
- Alok, K. (2011), “Towards Realist Constructivism: Implications for Teaching and Training”, Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(3): 523-35.
- Argyris, C. (1976), “Single-loop and Double-loop Models in Research on Decision Making”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(3): 363-75.
- Bandura, A. (2001), “Social Cognitive Theory: An Agentic Perspective”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1):1-26.
- Bandura, A. (2007), “Social Cognitive Theory”, in S. Rogelberg (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Industrial/ Organizational Psychology Vol. 2: 729-33,Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
- Baum, J. A. C. & Dahlin, K. B. (2007), “Aspirations, Performance and Railroads’ Patterns of Learning from Train Wrecks and Crashes”, Organization Science, 18(3): 368- 85.
- Baum, J. A. C., Xiao Li, S., & John, M. (2000), “Making the Next Move: How Experiential and Vicarious Learning Shape the Locations of Chains’ Acquisitions”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(4): 766-801.
- Benner, M. J. & Tushman, M. (2002), “Process Management and Technological Innovation: A Longitudinal Study of the Photography and Paint Industries. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47(4): 676-706.
- Bercovitz, J. & Feldman, M. (2008), “Academic Entrepreneurs: Organizational Change at the Individual Level”, Organization Science, 19(1): 69-89.
- Contu, A. & Willmott, H. (2003), “Re-embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory”, Organization Science, 14(3): 283-96.
- Cowan, D. A. (1995), “Rhythms of Learning: Patterns that Bridge Individuals and :Organizations”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 4(3): 222-46.
- Crossan, M. M., Lane, H. W. & White, R. E. (1999), “An Organizational Learning Framework: from Intution to Institution”, Academy of Management Review, 24(3): 522-37.
- Crossan, M. M., Maurer, C. C. & White, R. E. (2011), “Reflections on the 2009 AMR Decade Award: Do We Have a Theory of Organizational Learning?” Academy of Management Review, 36(3): 446-60.
- Cyert, R. M., & March, J. G. (1963), A Behavioral Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Danneels, E. (2002), “The Dynamics of Product Innovation and Firm Competencies”, Strategic Management Journal, 23(12): 1095- 21.
- Dodgson, M. (1993), “Organizational Learning: A Review of Some Literatures”, Organization Studies, 14(3): 375-94.
- Easterby-Smith, M., Crossan, M. & Nicolini, D. (2000), “Organizational Learning: Debates Past, Present and Future”, Journal of Management Studies, 37(6): 783-96.
- Edmondson, A. C. (2002), “The Local and Variegated Nature of Learning in Organizations: A Group-Level Perspective”, Organization Science, 13(2): 128-46.
- Fang, C., Lee, J. & Schilling, M. A. (2010), “Balancing Exploration and Exploitation through Structural Design: The Isolation of Subgroups and Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, 21(3): 625-42.
- Friedman, V. J., Lipshitz, R. & Popper, M. (2005), “The Mystification of Organizational Learning”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1): 19-30.
- Gibson, C. & Vermeulen, F. (2003), A Healthy Divide: Subgroup as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 48(2): 202-39.
- Haas, M. R. & Park, S. (2010), “To Share or Not to Share? Professional Norms, Reference Groups, and Information Withholding among Life Scientists”, Organization Science, 21(4): 873-91.
- Kane, G. C. & Alavi, M. (2007), Information Technology and Organizational Learning: An Investigation of Exploration and Exploitation Processes”, Organization Science, 18(5): 796-813.
- Katila, R. & Chen, E. L. (2008), “Effects of Search Timing on Innovation: The Value of Not Being in Sync with Rivals”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(4): 593-625.
- Kernochan, R. A., McCormick, D. W. & White, J. A. (2007), Spirituality and the Management Teacher: Reflections of Three Bud dhists on Compassion, Mindfulness and Selflessness in the Classroom”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 16(1): 61-75.
- Kim, J., Kim, J. & Miner, A. S. (2009), “Organizational Learning from Extreme Performance Experience: The Impact of Success and Recovery Experience”, Organization Science, 20(6): 958-78.
- Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991), Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
- Levinthal, D. & Rerup, C. (2006), “Crossing an Apparant Chasm: Bridging Mindful and Less-Mindful Perspectives on Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, 17(4): 502-13.
- Madsen, P. M. & Desai, V. (2010), “Failing to Learn? The Effects of Failure and Success on Organizational Learning in the Global Orbital Launch Vehicle Industry”, Academy of Management Journal, 53(3): 451-76.
- March, J. G. (1991), “Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning”, Organization Science, 2(1): 71-87.
- Miller, D. (1996), “A Preliminary Typology of Organizational Learning: Synthesizing the Literature”, Journal of Management, 22(3): 485-05.
- Miller, K. D. & Lin, S. (2010), “Different Truths in Different Worlds”, Organization Science, 21(1): 97-114.
- Miner, A. S., Bassoff, P. & Moorman, C. (2001), “Organizational Improvisation and Learning: A Field Study”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(2): 304-37.
- Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Bachrach, D. G. & Podsakoff, N. P. (2005), “The Influence of Management Journals in the 1980s and 1990s”, Strategic Management Journal, 26(5): 473-88.
- Schulz, M. (2001), “The Uncertain Relevance of Newness: Organizational Learning and Knowledge Flows”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4): 661-81.
- Scott, R. W. & Davis, G. F. (2007), Organizations and Organizing: Rational, Natural and Open System Perspectives, Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
- Senge, P. M. (1994), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, New York: Currency Doubleday.
- Simpson, B. & Marshall, N. (2010), “The Mutuality of Emotions and Learning in Organizations”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 19(4): 351-65.
- Skinner, B. F. (2002), Beyond Freedom and Dignity, Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing Company.
- Sørensen, J. B. & Stuart, T. E. (2000), “Aging, Obsolescence and Organizational Learning”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 45(1): 81-112.
- Tahai, A. & Meyer, M. J. (1999), “A Revealed Preference Study of Management Journals’ Direct Influences”, Strategic Management Journal, 20(3): 279-96.
- Villalonga, B. & McGahan, A. M. (2005), “The Choice Among Acquisitions, Alliances and Divestitures”, Strategic Management Journal, 26(13): 1183-1208.
- Weick, K. E. & Putnam, T. (2006), “Organizing Mindfulness: Eastern Wisdom and Western Knowledge”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 15(3): 275-87.
- Authentic Leadership & Work Engagement
Abstract Views :609 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Kumar Alok
1,
D. Israel
2
Affiliations
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, IN
2 XLRI Jamshedpur, IN
1 Chandragupt Institute of Management, Patna, IN
2 XLRI Jamshedpur, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev., Vol 47, No 3 (2012), Pagination: 498-510Abstract
The concern here is to understand how in organizations: a) authentic leadership relates to work engagement and psychological ownership, and b) psychological ownership interferes with the relationship between authentic leadership and work engagement. Using a correlational research design, the authors collected cross-sectional data from 117 working professionals through a Google Docs based survey in India. They found through regression analyses that authentic leadership indirectly relates to work engagement of employees through the full mediation of organization-based promotive psychological ownership. They discuss the implications for theory and research and argue that authentic leadership theory should include context variables such as control and position power.References
- Argyris, C. (1954), “The Fusion of an Individual with the Organization”, American Sociological Review, 19(3): 267-72.
- Argyris, C. (1959), “The Individual and Organization: An Empirical Test”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 4(2): 145-67.
- Argyris, C. (1964), Integrating the Individual and the Organization, New York: Wiley.
- Argyris, C. (1973), “Personality and Organization Theory Revisited, Administrative Science Quarterly, 18(2): 141-67.
- Attridge, M. (2009),” Measuring and Managing Employee Work Engagement: A Review of the Research and Business Literature”, Journal of Workplace Behavioral Health, 24(4): 383-98.
- Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Crossley, C. & Luthans, F. (2009), “Psychological ownership: Theoretical extensions, measurement, and relation to work outcomes”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30 (2), 173-191.
- Avolio, B. J., Walumbwa, F. O. & Weber, T. J. (2009), “Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions”, Annual Review of Psychology, 60(1): 421-49.
- Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986), “The Moderator- Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6): 1173-82.
- Bates, S. (2004), “Getting Engaged”, HR Magazine, 49(2): 44-51.
- Baumeister, R. F. (1999), “The Nature and Structure of the Self”, in R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), The Self in Social Psychology : 1-20. Philadelphia, PA: Taylor & Francis.
- Brown, T. (1989), “What Will It Take to Win? (psychological ownership), Industry Week, June 19, 238: 15.
- Christian, M. S., Garza, A. S. & Slaughter, J. E. (2011), “Work Engagement: A Quantitative Review and Test of Its Relations with Task and Contextual Performance”, Personnel Psychology, 64(1):89-136.
- Dittmar, H. (1992), The Social Psychology of Material Possessions: To Have Is To Be, New York: St. Martin’s Press.
- Durbin, J. & Watson, G. S. (1951), “Testing for Serial Correlation in Least Squares Regression”, Biometrika, 38(1-2):159-78.
- Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J., Luthans, F., May, D. R. & Walumbwa, F. (2005). “Can You See the Real Me? A Self-based Model of Authentic Leader and Follower Development”, Leadership Quarterly, 16(3): 343– 72.
- Gardner, W. L., Avolio, B. J. & Walumbwa, F. O. (2006), Authentic Leadership Theory and Practice: Origins, Effects and Development, Amsterdam: Elsevier JAI Press.
- Gardner, W. L. & Schermerhorn, J. R. (2004), “Unleashing Individual Potential Performance Gains Through Positive Organizational Behaviour and Authentic Leadership”, Organizational Dynamics, 33(3): 270-81.
- Graen, G. B. & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995), “Relationship- Based Approach to Leadership: Development of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) Theory of Leadership Over 25 Years: Applying a Multi-Level, Multi-Domain Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, 20(2): 219-47.
- Kahn, W. A. (1990),” Psychological Conditions of Personal Engagement and Disengagement at Work”, Academy of Management Journal, 33(4): 692-724.
- Klenke, K. (2007), “Authentic Leadership: A Self, Leader, and Spiritual Identity Perspective”, International Journal of Leadership Studies, 3(1): 68-97.
- Lawler, E. E. & Hall, D. T. (1970), “Relationship of Job Characteristics to Job Involvement, Satisfaction, and Intrinsic Motivation”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 54 (4): 305-12.
- Lodahl, T. M. & Kejnar, M. (1965), “The Definition and Measurement of Job Involvement”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 49(1): 24-33.
- Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. J. (2003), “Authentic Leadership: A Positive Developmental Approach” in K. S. Cameron, J. E. Dutton & R. E. Quinn (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (: 241-61), San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
- Luthans, F. & Avolio, B. J. (2009), “The ‘Point’ of Positive Organizational Behaviour”. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 30(2):291-307.
- Maslach, C. & Leiter, M. P. (1997), The Truth about Burnout: How Organizations Cause Personal Stress and What to Do about It, San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
- Mayhew, M. G., Ashkanasy, N. M., Bramble, T. & Gardner, J. (2007), “A Study of the Antecedents and Consequences of Psychological Ownership in Organizational Settings”, The Journal of Social Psychology, 147(5), 477-500.
- Novicevic, M. M., Harvey, M. G., Buckley, M. R., Brown, J. A. & Evans, R. (2006), “Authentic Leadership: A Historical Perspective”, Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 13(1): 64-76.
- Pati, S. P. & Kumar, P. (2010), “Employee Engagement: Role of Self-efficacy, Organizational Support & Supervisor Support”. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 46(1): 126-37.
- Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2001), “Toward a Theory of Psychological Ownership in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 26(2): 296-310.
- Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T. & Dirks, K. T. (2003), “The State of Psychological Ownership: Integrating and Extending a Century of Research”, Review of General Psychology, 7(1): 84-107.
- Pierce, J. L., O’Driscoll, M. P. & Coghlan, A.-M. (2004), “Work Environment Structure and Psychological Ownership: The Mediating Effects of Control”, Journal of Social Psychology, 144(5): 507-34.
- Price, T. L. (2003), “The Ethics of Authentic Transformational Leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, 14(1): 67-81.
- Rhoades, L. & Eisenberger, R. (2002), “Perceived Organizational Support: A Review of the Literature”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 698-714.
- Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000), “Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions”, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.
- Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001), “On Happiness and Human Potential: A Review of Research on Hedonic and Eudaimonic Well being”, Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1): 141-66.
- Saks, A. M. (2006), “Antecedents and Consequences of Employee Engagement”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7): 600- 19.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B. & Salanova, M. (2006), “The Measurement of Work Engagement with a Short Questionnaire: A Cross-national Study”, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4): 701-16.
- Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., Gonza·lez-Roma, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002), “The Measurement of Engagement and Burnout: A Two Sample Confirmatory Factor Analytic Approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1): 71-92.
- Van Dyne, L. & Pierce, J. L. (2004), “Psychological Ownership and Feelings of Possession: Three Field Studies Predicting Employee Attitudes and Organizational Citizenship Behaviour”, Journal of Organization Behaviour, 25(4): 439-59.
- Walumbwa, F. O., Avolio, B. J., Gardner, W. L., Wernsing, T. S. & Peterson, S. J. (2008), “Authentic Leadership: Development and Validation of a Theory-Based Measure”, Journal of Management, 34(1): 89-126.
- Walumbwa, F. O., Wang, P., Wang, H., Schaubroeck, J. & Avolio, B. J. (2010), “Psychological Processes Linking Authentic Leadership to Follower Behaviours”. Leadership Quarterly, 21(5): 901-14.
- Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Schriesheim, C. A. & Dansereau, F. (2008), “Authentic Leadership and Positive Organizational Behaviour: A Meso, Multi-level Perspective”, Leadership Quarterly, 19(6): 693- 707.