Indian Journal of Industrial Relations: Economics & Social Dev.

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Reward Program, Job Satisfaction & Employee Engagement:An Empirical Study


Affiliations
1 School of Business, University of Bolton, Academic Centre, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
2 Compensation & Benefits Lead,MEA at Mondelçz, Dubai, United Arab Emirates
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


Worker engagement is a trait that measures a representative’s dedication to a given association that they work for. Regardless of different types of engagements utilized by different managers, employee execution remains a range of worry among different associations. A survey was organized on 148 respondents which caught the respondents’ profile and information important to all the study variables. The standard statistical tests have been performed on the data. The measurable investigation demonstrated that there is a note worthy relationship between the gender-based orientation, age, experience and acknowledgment programs. The study suggested that associations ought to give development and improvement chances to their workers in endeavors to upgrade their ability and execution.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Ali, R. & Ahmed, S. (2009),”The Impact of Reward &Recognition-Programs on Motivation &Satisfaction of Employees - an Empirical Study”,International Review of Business Research Papers, 5(4): 269-78.

  • Armstrong, M. (ed.) (2008), Armstrong’s Handbook of Strategic Human Resource Management. 5th ed. London: Kogan Page.

  • Bhuian, N. (1996),”Extrinsic Job Satisfaction among Multi-cultural Expatriate Work Force”, Atlantic Journal of Business, 32 (1): 35-46.

  • Board, M. (2007),”Coaching a Stockholder on Performance Improvement Option”, International Conference, Atlanta GA, ASTD, USA.

  • Boxall, P. (1996), “The Strategic HRM Debate and the Resource Based View-of-the Firm”,Journal of Human Resource Management, 6 (3): 57-76.

  • Boxall, P.F.& Purcell, J. (2003), Strategy and Human Resource Management, Palgrave Macmillan,London.

  • Devanna, M.A., Fombrun, C. &Tichy, N. (eds.) (1984), Strategic Human Resource Management, 3rd ed. New York: John Wiley

  • Hackman, R. & Oldham, R. (1976),”Motivation through the Design of Work”, Organizational Behavior and Human-Performanc, 16: 71–77

  • Herzberg, F., Mausner, B.& Snyderman, B.B.(1959),The Motivation to Work, New York: John Wiley,

  • Lewis, B. & Frank, A. (2002),”Government Employees: Working Hard or Hardly Working?”American Review of Public Administration, 34 (1): 36-51.

  • Luthaans, K.W. & Summers, S.M. (2005),”The Impacts of High Performance-work on Industry Level Outcomes”,Journal of ManagerialDecisions,17 (3): 326-46.

  • Maccey, H. , Schneider , B., Barbera , K.M. & Young, S.A. (2009),Employee Engagement, Malden: Wiley-Blackwell, London.

  • Mondelez Dubai, Human Resource Department (2010), Employee Engagement Survey Report. Dubai UAE.

  • Mondelez International (2018), Corporate Fact Sheet 2016. [Online] Available at: http://www.mondelezinternational.com/about-us. [Accessed on 20 March 2018].

  • Parker, K.&Ohly, S. (2008),”Designing Motivating Jobs”,in Kanfer, Chen, and Pritchard (Eds.), Work Motivation: Past, Present &Future, Oxford, UK, Routledge.

  • Pinder, C.C. (eds.) (2008),”Work Motivation in Organizational Behavior”, 2nd ed. Routledge,London.

  • Schuler, S.& Jackson, E. (1996), Strategic Human Resource Management. Oxford, Blackwell Business

  • Scott, D. & Mc-Mullen, T.D. (2006),”Evaluating Pay Program Effectiveness: ANational Survey of Compensation Professional”, Worldat Work Journal,15 (3): 47-53.

  • Vansteenkiste, M. & Lens, W. (2006),”Intrinsic Versus Extrinsic Goal Contents in Self-Determination Theory. Quality of Academic Motivation”,Educational Psychologist, 41(1):20–23.

  • Walsham, G., (1995),”Interpretive Case Studies in IS Research – Nature and Methods”, European Journal of Information System, 4(2): 74-78.

  • Wangia, Y. (2004),”Organizational Commitment and Observations for Chinese Employees: Comparative Studies of State-Owned Enterprises”, The International Journal of Human Resource Management., 15 (5): 61– 64.

  • Williamson, O., Saros, J.E., Vincent, W. F. &Smol, J.P. (2009),”The Interactive Effect of Collectivism and Organizational Rewards on Affective Organizational Commitment”, Cross Cultural Management: An International Journal, 16: 28–43.


Abstract Views: 380

PDF Views: 0




  • Reward Program, Job Satisfaction & Employee Engagement:An Empirical Study

Abstract Views: 380  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

Indranil Bose
School of Business, University of Bolton, Academic Centre, Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates
Ramjee Maheshwary
Compensation & Benefits Lead,MEA at Mondelçz, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Abstract


Worker engagement is a trait that measures a representative’s dedication to a given association that they work for. Regardless of different types of engagements utilized by different managers, employee execution remains a range of worry among different associations. A survey was organized on 148 respondents which caught the respondents’ profile and information important to all the study variables. The standard statistical tests have been performed on the data. The measurable investigation demonstrated that there is a note worthy relationship between the gender-based orientation, age, experience and acknowledgment programs. The study suggested that associations ought to give development and improvement chances to their workers in endeavors to upgrade their ability and execution.

References