Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Sharma, Jyoti
- Publication Productivity of Mathematics in Select Universities of Chandigarh and Punjab: A Scientometric View
Abstract Views :226 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, IN
Source
International Journal of Information Library and Society, Vol 4, No 1 (2015), Pagination: 27-33Abstract
The present study focuses on publication productivity in some select Universities of Chandigarh and Punjab during the year 2004-2013. The methodology used for analysing the research output in the field of Mathematics is reflected in Scopus Database. The study deals with 532 publications of Panjab University, Chandigarh (PU), Punjabi University, Patiala (PUP) and Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar (GNDU) in the field of Mathematics. It examines the Mathematics output by different ways like document type, source type, authorship pattern and degree of collaboration. The study also examines the relative growth rate of publications, doubling time for publications and participative index rate of Universities.Keywords
Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjabi University, Patiala, Guru Nanak Dev University, Amritsar, Mathematics, Authorship Pattern and Bibliometric/Scientometric Analysis.
- Core & Technical Competency Status of Academic Library Professionals in Panjab University Chandigarh: A Survey
Abstract Views :195 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, IN
1 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, Punjab, IN
Source
International Journal of Information Library and Society, Vol 4, No 2 (2015), Pagination: 7-10Abstract
The professional competency includes the necessary knowledge and skills to be possessed by any professionals. It is crucial in case of LIS professionals also. These competencies are based on the values of the organization and not only sharpen the ability of the professional but also contributes to organizational success in the long run. The purpose of this paper is to review the perception, expectations, preferences and current status of two competencies (core and technical) that are required by the library professionals. Core competencies are based on the values of the organization. Technical competencies are the ability of a person to do their job comparatively and on the same level as other professionals in their field. This paper is an attempt to map these competencies level among Library Professionals of Panjab University, Chandigarh. The study is based upon the response received by the LIS professionals (library assistants and assistant librarians) for which a structured questionnaire was prepared.Keywords
Competencies, Continuous Professional Development, CPD, Library Professionals, Assistant Librarians, Library Assistants, Panjab University.- Collaborative Publication Trends Among Faculty Members of Central Universities of North India
Abstract Views :214 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department cum Centre for Women Studies and Development, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IN
2 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IN
1 Department cum Centre for Women Studies and Development, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IN
2 Department of Library & Information Science, Panjab University, Chandigarh, IN
Source
International Journal of Information Library and Society, Vol 7, No 2 (2018), Pagination: 18-25Abstract
This paper attempts to highlight the collaborative publication trend of library and information science (LIS) faculty members in the select central universities of north India. The data for the study was collected by questionnaire and from the websites of universities. A total of 1292 publications were published by LIS faculty during the period 1978-2014, out of these 854 are multi-authored publications. The study depicts that highest publications are contributed as double-authored. The co-authorship index is highest in 1991 i.e. 294.12 as singleauthored, in 1982 i.e. 153.85 as double-authored, in 1989 i.e. 219.78 as triple-authored and in 2014 i.e. 404.04 as ≥ 4 authored publications. Total authors involved in the publications are 2349. The highest MCC is in 2014 (0.46) and the lowest in 1991 (0).Keywords
A Collaborative Publication, Collaborative Measures, Collaborative Research, Central Universities, North India, Library and Information Science, Central University of Himachal Pradesh, Dharamshala (CUHP), University of Delhi, Delhi (DU), Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh (AMU), Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi (BHU), Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar University, Lucknow (BBAU).References
- Garg, K. C., & Padhi, P. (2001). A study of collaboration in laser science and technology. Scientometrics, 51(2), 415-427.
- Vellaichamy, A., & Jeyshankar, R. (2015). Publication productivity of Pondicherry university Seen through Scopus: A scientometric study. Journal of Advances in Library and Information Science, 4(2), 113-119.
- Ramakrishnan, J., & Thavamani, K. (2015). Authorship pattern and collaborative research in the field of Hepatitis C. Asian Journal of Information Science and Technology, 5(1), 23-32.
- Savanur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying the degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84(2), 365-371. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-009-0100-4
- Ajiferuke, I., Burrel, Q., & Tague, J. (1988). Collaborative coeficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 14, 421-433.
- Mani, K. T. (2014). Authorship Patterns and Collaborative Research in Malaysian Journal of Library and Information Science, 1996-2012. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 1177. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/1177
- Vivekanandhan, S., & Bathrinarayanan, A. L. (2014). Authorship trends and collaborative research in Bharathiyar University research output: A scienometric study. International Journal of Current Research in Life SciencesV/IJCRLS, 3(12), 91-96.
- Price, D. D. S. (1981). The analysis of scientometric metrics for policy implications, Scientometrics, 3, 47-54.
- Frame, J. D. (1977). Mainstream research in Latin America and Caribbean. Interciencia, 2, 143-148.
- Schubert, A., & Braun, T. (1986). Relative indicators and relational charts for comparative assessment of publication output and citation impact, Scientometrics, 9, 281-291.
- Bordons, M., Gomez, I., Fernandez, M. T., Zulueta, M. A., & Mendez, A. (1996). Local, domestic and international scientific collaboration in biomedical research, Scientometrics, 37, 279–295.
- Lawani, S. M. (1980). Quality, collaboration and citations in cancer research: A bibliometric study (Unpublished Doctoral Thesis). Florida: School of library science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, (United States).
- Krishnappa, S. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. Journal of Information Science, 6(1), 33-8.
- Isola, A., Burell, Q., & Jean, T. (1988). Collaborative coefficient: A single measure of the degree of collaboration in research. Scientometrics, 4(5-6), 421-33.
- Waila, P., Singh, V. K., & Singh, M. K. (2016). A scientometric analysis of research in recommender systems. J Scientometric Res., 5(1), 71-84. Retrieved from http://www.jscires.org/v5/i1
- Ramiah, S. K. (2016). Publications trends in nuclear physics: A global perspective. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). Paper 1361. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/ libphilprac/1361
- Kumar, H. A., Dora, M., & Desai, A. (2015). A bibliometrics profile of Gujarat University, Ahmedabad during 2004-2013. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology, 35(1), 9-16.
- Subramanyam, K. (1983). Bibliometric studies of research collaboration: A review. J. inf. Sci., 6(1), 33-38.
- Savnur, K., & Srikanth, R. (2010). Modified collaborative coefficient: A new measure for quantifying degree of research collaboration. Scientometrics, 84, 365-71.
- Garfield, E. (1979). Is citation analysis a legitimate evaluation tool? Scientometrics, 1(4), 359-375.