Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing

Ratnesh Dwivedi ¹, Abha Singh ², Sarah Partlow ³, Anuradha Sharma ²

Affiliations
1 Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Amity Institute of Psychology and Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN
3 Dept. of Communication, Idaho State University, Idaho, US

Abstract

There are numerous parameters that have to be taken into consideration when considering the relationship between the media and terrorism. The relationship is complicated by the use of the media by terrorists to optimize the psychological impact of their acts of terror beyond the immediate location of the act itself, and what could cynically be described as the media's use of terrorism to attract audiences. The invasion of a terrorist victim's privacy is the most direct and visible harm from media coverage of terrorism. The invasion of privacy by the media both during and following a terrorist event such as kidnapping, for instance, can be as traumatic to victims and their families as the actual kidnapping itself. If business executives dicker about ransom, for instance, company management will be perceived as insensitive or materialistic in its concern. Thus, publicized ransom decisions can adversely effect executive morale and increase exposure to future terrorist attacks. The public has a valid interest in preserving domestic order.' The media, especially the broadcaster, can often frustrate police management by interfering with on-going operations, compounding the pressure on authorities, and impairing their ability to make decisions. By its very nature, terrorism is meant to capture the attention of the public. It is directed at changing the way society thinks. Modern technology, through television and the capabilities of global satellite communications systems, has provided terror groups with a critical communications instrument through which the terrorist receives instantaneous worldwide publicity. Terrorists use the media as a form of political advertising. Since they cannot buy television time, they gain coverage through commission of terrorist acts. Just as early television sponsors produced shows as vehicles for their commercials, 30 media terrorists now provide live drama-murder and kidnapping-in return for "advertising time".

Keywords

Terrorism, Media, Regulation, 9/11, Media Coverage, Self Constraint.

Full Text

     

Ratnesh Dwivedi ¹, Abha Singh ², Sarah Partlow ³, Anuradha Sharma ²

Affiliations
1 Amity School of Communication, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN
2 Amity Institute of Psychology and Allied Sciences, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, IN
3 Department of Communication, Idaho State University, Idaho, US

Abstract

The concept of globalization or internationalization of certain wars, which were result of terrorist activities worldwide, as well as the high attention of terrorism coverage broadcast worldwide might open up better opportunities to journalists particularly to those who work in democratic countries like U.S.Aand India to improve their coverage. The context is the key: the context of the operation methodology, follow of guidelines of regulatory bodies, and of the journalistic culture and of the global environment. It is very important how media presents consequences of terrorist acts, how information is transmitted to public. Television and press have had a significant impact on how public receives terrorist acts and their consequences. As a result, nearly each public survey indicates that responders almost anywhere put fear of terrorist acts o the top of their priority list. In order to reach out on a conclusion on this paper, researcher has gone through number of books related to terrorism and media, has examined significant number of journals which deals with core issue of terrorism and its coverage by media.

Keywords

Terrorism, BBC, CNN, CNN-IBN, Coverage, Regulation.

Full Text