Refine your search
Collections
Co-Authors
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Ninaniya, Pinki
- Attitude towards Modernization of Senior Secondary School Students
Abstract Views :587 |
PDF Views:0
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, COHS, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, COHS, CCS Haiyana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
1 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, COHS, CCS Haryana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
2 Department of Human Development and Family Studies, COHS, CCS Haiyana Agricultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 8, No 7 (2017), Pagination: 716-719Abstract
Modernization is the process of social transition, use of new technology, tools, adoption of new values and practices in organizations are all aspects of change and modernization. Adolescence is very important stage in the process of development as adolescent face internal crises because of cognitive social and biological changes. The present study was carried out in Hisar district of Haryana state. The sample consisted 100 adolescents from rural and lOO trom urban between the age group of 16-17 years (both boys&girls). Comprehensive Modernization Inventory developed by Ahluwalia and Kalia (1998) was used to assess attitude of adolescents towards modernization. Results observed that girls had more positive attitude in all the components of modernization than their counterparts except politics where boys possessing higher percentage as compare to girls. Further mean scores indicated that significant difference were obtained in education, F-C relationship, status of women and as well as politics. Further girls respondents had more positive attitude towards education, P-C relationship as well as status of women as compared to boys.Keywords
Modernization, Education, P-C Relationship, Attitude, Students.
- Perception of Adolescents about their Family Environment:A Comparative Study
Abstract Views :244 |
PDF Views:1
Authors
Affiliations
1 Department ofHuman Development and Family Studies, COHS CCS Haryana Agrieultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
2 Government College for Women Seetor 14, Punehkula, Haryana, IN
1 Department ofHuman Development and Family Studies, COHS CCS Haryana Agrieultural University, Hisar, Haryana, IN
2 Government College for Women Seetor 14, Punehkula, Haryana, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Health and Wellbeing, Vol 9, No 5 (2018), Pagination: 721-723Abstract
Family is the most important institute in whole society where a person related by blood with each other and this is the place of security, promise and comfort and with the help of marriage they live together. The present study was carried out in Hisar district of Haryana state. For the study 200 adolescents i.e 100 trom rural and 100 trom urban between the age group of 16-18 years were selected. Family Environment Scale developed by Bhatia and Chadha (1993) was used to assess home environment of the adolescents. Results revealed that significant differences were noted between cohesion, acceptance and caring and control aspects of family environment and living area of respondents. Results further revealed that urban respondents had better quality of family environment, as they were showing higher percentages as compare to rural respondents on all the aspects except active recreational orientation and conflict, who had showing poor quality of family environment.Keywords
Adolescents, Family Environment, Rural, Urban.References
- Bandhana, S.P.D. (2012). Home environment, mental health and academic achievement among higher secondary school students. International Journal of Scientific and Research, 2, Issue 5.
- Bhatia, H., & Chadha, N.K. (1993). Family Environment Scale (FES). Ankur PsychologicalAgency, 22/481, IndraNagar, Lucknow.
- Deepshikha & Bhanot, S. (2011). Role of family environment on socio-emotional adjustment of adolescent girls in rural areas of Eastern Uttar Pradesh. Journal of Psychology, 2(1), 53-56.
- Farell, M.P., & Branes, G.M. (1993). Family system and social support. A test ofthe effects of cohesion and adaptability on functioning of parents and adolescents. Journal of Marriage and Famil-y, 55, 119-132.
- Grolnick, W.S.,Benjet, C.,Kurowick, C.O., & Apostoleries, N.H. (1997). Predictors of parent involvement. Children's schooling. Journal of Educational Psychology, 59(3), 538-548.
- McKeown, R. E., Garrison, C. Z., Jackson, K. L., Cuffe, S. P.,Addy, C. L., & Waller, J. L. (1997). Family structure and cohesion, and depressive symptoms in adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 7, 267-282.
- Mohanraj, R. L. (2005). Perceived family environment in relation to adjustment and academic achievement. .Journal of the Indian Academy ofApplied Psychology, 51, 18-23.
- Ozcinar, Z. 2006. The instructional communicative qualification of parents with students. C-ypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 1,24-30.
- Uma, L., & Kiran, K.V. (2014). Astudy on the adolescent's perception about their family QnvironmQnt. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 19, 1-4.
- Van Wei, F. (2000). The parental bond and the well-being of adolescents and young a.AFi.Xs. JournalofYouth a-ndAdolescence, 28,307-318.
- Varsha, S. {2QV5). Parenting style as determination of children's behavior Department of family studies, I.C. College of Home Science, CCS HAU, Hisar. Unpublished Thesis, pp. 1-45.
- Wentzel, K.R., & Feldman, S. S. (1996). Relations of cohesion and power in family dyads to social and emotional adjustment during early adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 6(2) 225-244.
- Wissink, I., Dekovic, M., & Meijer, A. (2006). Parenting behaviour, quality of the parent-adolescent relationship, and adolescent functioning in four ethnic groups. Journal of Early Adolescence, 26, 133-159.