Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of the University in the Entrepreneurial Intention of Female Students


Affiliations
1 Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
 

Many researchers have studied gender differences in the entrepreneurial intention of students by analyzing the influence of several intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention. Fewer researchers have analyzed the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of the entrepreneurial intention of students in general and of female students in particular. This study aims to fill that gap by analyzing the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of entrepreneurial intention of female students at a university in Atlantic Canada. Findings of this study confirm that two precursors of entrepreneurial intention—i.e., attitude toward behavior and perceived behavioral control—mediate the effects of the university’s environment and support system on the entrepreneurial intention of female students. They also confirm that the university’s environment and support system comprises three distinct but interrelated dimensions, namely entrepreneurship training, start-up support, and entrepreneurial milieu. Results of this study also suggest that the university’s environment and support system has a positive relation with the perceived behavioral control of female students. However, findings of this study also suggest that the university’s environment and support system has a positive but negligible influence on the attitude toward the behavior of the same students. The outcomes of this study will help the university assess the efficacy of its innovation and entrepreneurship initiatives in promoting entrepreneurial activities. By understanding its entrepreneurial efficacy, the institution will be better equipped to raise the perceptions of venture feasibility and desirability, thus increasing students’ perceptions of opportunity.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial Intention, University Environment and Support System, Theory of Planned Behavior, Female Student Entrepreneurs, Regional Development.
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Joo, H. (2013). Best-Practice Recommendations for Defining, Identifying, and Handling Outliers. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428112470848
  • Ajzen, I. (1987). Attitudes, traits, and actions: Dispositional prediction of behavior in personality and social psychology. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 20(C), 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60411-6
  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27
  • Akaike, H. (1998). Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-1694-0_15
  • Amentie, C., & Negash, E. (2015). The Study on Female Undergraduates’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Entrepreneurship Development (Comparison Public and Private Universities in Ethiopia). Journal of Accounting & Marketing, 04(01), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.4172/2168-9601.1000123
  • Arora, S., & Jain, S. (2019). Influence of Gender on Entrepreneurial Intentions among Business Management Students. Indian Journal of Industrial Relations, 54(3).
  • Arshad, M., Farooq, O., Sultana, N., & Farooq, M. (2016). Determinants of individuals’ entrepreneurial intentions: a gender-comparative study. Career Development International, 21(4), 318–339. https://doi.org/10.1108/CDI-10-2015-0135
  • Ashkezari, M. R. D., & Ashkezari, A. Z. (2013). Identification, analysis and ranking the barriers to women’s entrepreneurship in industry from the perspective of female students. case study: The female students of Islamic Azad University, Yazd branch. Metalurgia International.
  • Audretsch, D. B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(3), 313–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1
  • Bae, T. J., Qian, S., Miao, C., & Fiet, J. O. (2014). The Relationship Between Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions: A Meta-Analytic Review. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 38(2), 217–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12095
  • Bagheri, A., & Lope Pihie, Z. A. (2014). The moderating role of gender in shaping entrepreneurial intentions: Implications for vocational guidance. International Journal for Educational and Vocational Guidance. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10775-014-9269-z
  • Baron, R. A. (1998). Cognitive mechanisms in entrepreneurship: Why and when entrepreneurs think differently than other people. Journal of Business Venturing, 13(4), 275–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00031-1
  • Baron, R. A. (2004). The cognitive perspective: A valuable tool for answering entrepreneurship’s basic “why” questions. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(2), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(03)00008-9
  • Bazan, C., Shaikh, A., Frederick, S., Amjad, A., Yap, S., Finn, C., & Rayner, J. (2019). Effect of Memorial University’s Environment & Support System in Shaping Entrepreneurial Intention of Students. Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 22(1), 1–35.
  • Bird, B. (1988). Implementing Entrepreneurial Ideas: The Case for Intention. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 442–453. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1988.4306970
  • Blunch, N. J. (2013). Introduction to structural equation modelling using IBM SPSS statistics and AMOS. SAGE.
  • Bollen, K. A., & Stine, R. (2006). Direct and Indirect Effects: Classical and Bootstrap Estimates of Variability. Sociological Methodology. https://doi.org/10.2307/271084
  • Boyd, N. G., & Vozikis, G. S. (1994). The Influence of Self-Efficacy on the Development of Entrepreneurial Intentions and Actions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 18, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879401800404
  • Bray, M. J., & Lee, J. N. (2000). University revenues from technology transfer: Licensing fees vs. equity positions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5–6), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00034-2
  • Byrne, B. M. (2001). Structural Equation Modeling With AMOS, EQS, and LISREL: Comparative Approaches to Testing for the Factorial Validity of a Measuring Instrument. International Journal of Testing. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0101_4
  • Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied Multiple Regression / Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd ed Hillsdale NJ Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.2307/2064799
  • Dabic, M., Daim, T., Bayraktaroglu, E., Novak, I., & Basic, M. (2012). Exploring gender differences in attitudes of university students towards entrepreneurship: An international survey. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261211264172
  • deLeeuw, J. (2011). Introduction to Akaike (1973) Information Theory and an Extension of the Maximum Likelihood Principle. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4612-0919-5_37
  • Delmar, F., & Davidsson, P. (2000). Where do they come from? prevalence and characteristics of nascent entrepreneurs. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 12(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856200283063
  • Dempsey, D., & Jennings, J. (2014). Gender and entrepreneurial self-efficacy: A learning perspective. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-02-2013-0013
  • Etzkowitz, H. (1998). The norms of entrepreneurial science: cognitive effects of the new university–industry linkages. Research Policy, 27(8), 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00093-6
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2003). Research groups as ‘quasi- firms’: the invention of the entrepreneurial university. Research Policy, 32(1), 109–121.
  • Etzkowitz, H. (2014). The second academic revolution: The rise of the entrepreneurial university and impetuses to firm foundation. In Building Technology Transfer Within Research Universities: An Entrepreneurial Approach (pp. 12–32). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139046930.004
  • Fayolle, A., Gailly, B. B., Lassas‐Clerc, N., & Lassas-Clerc, N. (2006). Assessing the impact of entrepreneurship education programmes: a new methodology. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(9), 701–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590610715022
  • Feder, E. S., & Niţu-Antonie, R. D. (2017). Connecting gender identity, entrepreneurial training, role models and intentions. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-08-2016-0028
  • Ferri, L., Ginesti, G., Spanò, R., & Zampella, A. (2018). Exploring the Entrepreneurial Intention of Female Students in Italy. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity. https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc4030027
  • Franke, N., & Lüthje, C. (2004). Entrepreneurial intentions of business students—A benchmarking study. International Journal of Innovation and and Technology Management, 1(3), 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0925-7
  • George, D., & Mallery, P. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference. British Journal of Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191112446654
  • Gupta, V. K., Turban, D. B., & Bhawe, N. M. (2008). The Effect of Gender Stereotype Activation on Entrepreneurial Intentions. Journal of Applied Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.5.1053
  • Gür, U., Oylumlu, İ. S., & Kunday, Ö. (2017). Critical assessment of entrepreneurial and innovative universities index of Turkey: Future directions. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 123, 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.09.008
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis. Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpharm.2011.02.019
  • Haus, I., Steinmetz, H., Isidor, R., & Kabst, R. (2013). Gender effects on entrepreneurial intention: A meta-analytical structural equation model. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/17566261311328828
  • Henderson, R., & Robertson, M. (1999). Who wants to be an entrepreneur? Young adult attitudes to entrepreneurship as a career. Education + Training, 41(5), 236–245. https://doi.org/10.1108/00400919910279973
  • Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis with IBM SPSS. CRC Press.
  • Hussain, A., & Hashim, N. (2016). Gender entrepreneurial intentions: A developing countries perspective. Paradigms, 10(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.24312/paradigms100205
  • Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, 32(9), 1555–1568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00024-6
  • Judd, C. M., & Kenny, D. A. (2015). Data Analysis in Social Psychology: Recent and Recurring Issues. In Handbook of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470561119.socpsy001004
  • Karimi, S., Biemans, H. J. A., Lans, T., Chizari, M., Mulder, M., & Mahdei, K. N. (2013). Understanding role Models and Gender Influences on Entrepreneurial Intentions Among College Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.09.179
  • Katz, J., & Gartner, W. (1988). Properties of Emerging Organizations. Academy of Management Review, 13(3), 429–441. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1988.4306967
  • Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Fink, M. (2015). Robustness of the theory of planned behavior in predicting entrepreneurial intentions and actions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 39(3), 655–674. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12056
  • Kautonen, T., van Gelderen, M., & Tornikoski, E. T. (2013). Predicting entrepreneurial behaviour: A test of the theory of planned behaviour. Applied Economics, 45(6), 697–707. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036846.2011.610750
  • Kirby, D. A. (2006a). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities : A Consideration. Management.
  • Kirby, D. A. (2006b). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599–603. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-006-9061-4
  • Kirby, D. A., Guerrero, M., & Urbano, D. (2011). Making universities more entrepreneurial: Development of a model. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1002/CJAS.220
  • Kolvereid, L. (1996a). Organizational Employment versus Self-Employment: Reasons for Career Choice Intentions. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 21(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.31.1.161461
  • Kolvereid, L. (1996b). Prediction of employment status choice intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice. Retrieved from http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&se=gglsc&d=5002278812%5Cnhttp://web.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?sid=520195f2-f364-4fe8-afa6-c2e9016bfa2c@sessionmgr111&vid=5&hid=118
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., Bos, G., & Groen, A. (2010). What do students think of the entrepreneurial support given by their universities? International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Small Business, 9(1), 110. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJESB.2010.029512
  • Kraaijenbrink, J., & Wijnhoven, F. (2008). Managing heterogeneous knowledge: A theory of external knowledge integration. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 6(4), 274–286. https://doi.org/10.1057/kmrp.2008.26
  • Krueger, N., & Carsrud, A. (1993). Entrepreneurial intentions: Applying the theory of planned behaviour. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 5(4), 315–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629300000020
  • Krueger, N., Reilly, M., & Carsrud, A. (2000). Competing models of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 15(5), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00033-0
  • Ledermann, T., & Macho, S. (2015). Assessing Mediation in Simple And Complex Models. International Journal of Mathematics, Game Theory and Algebra (Vol. 24). Retrieved from http://thomasledermann.com/mscm/.
  • Lee, S. H., & Wong, P. K. (2004). An exploratory study of technopreneurial intentions: A career anchor perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00112-X
  • Liñán, F., & Chen, Y. W. (2009). Development and cross-cultural application of a specific instrument to measure entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3), 593–617. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00318.x
  • Liñán, F., Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2011). Regional variations in entrepreneurial cognitions: Start-up intentions of university students in Spain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 23(3–4), 187–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985620903233929
  • Maassen, G. H., & Bakker, A. B. (2001). Suppressor variables in path models: Definitions and interpretations. Sociological Methods and Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124101030002004
  • MacKinnon, D. P., Krull, J. L., & Lockwood, C. M. (2000). Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prevention Science. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026595011371
  • Macmillan, I., & Katz, J. (1992). Idiosyncratic milieus of entrepreneurial research: The need for comprehensive theories. In Journal of Business Venturing (Vol. 7, pp. 1–8). https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(92)90031-L
  • Maes, J., Leroy, H., & Sels, L. (2014). Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: A TPB multi-group analysis at factor and indicator level. European Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2014.01.001
  • McGowan, P., van der Sijde, P., & Kirby, D. (2008). The Role of Universities in the Entrepreneurship Industry: Promoting the Entrepreneurship Agenda in HEIs. Industry and Higher Education, 22(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000008783876986
  • Mueller, S. L., & Dato-On, M. C. (2008). Gender-role orientation as a determinant of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1142/S108494670800082X
  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R and D Management, 37(1). https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9310.2007.00454.x
  • Ojewumi, A. K., Oyeleke, J. T., Agberotimi, F., & Adedayo, O. (2018). Obafemi Awolowo University Undergraduate Students : The Influence of Gender and Self- Efficacy on Entrepreneurial Intentions. The Journal of Pan African Studies.
  • Perez-Quintana, A., Hormiga, E., Martori, J. C., & Madariaga, R. (2017). The influence of sex and gender-role orientation in the decision to become an entrepreneur. International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJGE-12-2015-0047
  • Peterman, N. E., & Kennedy, J. (2003). Enterprise Education: Influencing Students’ Perceptions of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 28(2), 129–144. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1540-6520.2003.00035.x
  • Phipps, S. T. A. (2012). Contributors to an enterprising gender: Examining the influence of creativity on entrepreneurial intentions and the moderating role of political skill controlling for gender. Academy of Entrepreneurship Journal.
  • Poole, D., & Robertson, B. (2003). Hunting the snark or leading with purpose? Managing the enterprise university. Journal of Management and Organization, 9(3), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2003.9.3.8
  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods.
  • Rae, D., & Woodier-Harris, N. R. (2013). How does enterprise and entrepreneurship education influence postgraduate students’ career intentions in the New Era economy? Education and Training. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-07-2013-0095
  • Rauch, A., & Hulsink, W. (2015). Putting entrepreneurship Education where the intention to Act lies: An investigation into the impact of entrepreneurship education on entrepreneurial behavior. Academy of Management Learning and Education. https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2012.0293
  • Sahban, M. A., Ramalu, S. S., & Syahputra, R. (2016). The Influence of Social Support on Entrepreneurial Inclination among Business Students in Indonesia. Information Management and Business Review, 8(3), 32–46.
  • Sánchez, J. C. (2011). University training for entrepreneurial competencies: Its impact on intention of venture creation. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-010-0156-x
  • Sesen, H. (2013). Personality or environment? A comprehensive study on the entrepreneurial intentions of university students. Education and Training, 55(7), 624–640. https://doi.org/10.1108/ET-05-2012-0059
  • Shaver, K. G., & Scott, L. R. (1991). Person, process, choice: The psychology of new venture creation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16(2), 23–45. https://doi.org/Article
  • Shirokova, G., Osiyevskyy, O., & Bogatyreva, K. (2016). Exploring the intention–behavior link in student entrepreneurship: Moderating effects of individual and environmental characteristics. European Management Journal, 34(4), 386–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2015.12.007
  • Shneor, R., Metin Camgöz, S., & Bayhan Karapinar, P. (2013). The interaction between culture and sex in the formation of entrepreneurial intentions. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985626.2013.862973
  • Sörbom, D. (1974). A General Method for Studying Differences in Factor Means and Factor Structure Between Groups. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1974.tb00543.x
  • Souitaris, V., Zerbinati, S., & Al-Laham, A. (2007). Do entrepreneurship programmes raise entrepreneurial intention of science and engineering students? The effect of learning, inspiration and resources. Journal of Business Venturing, 22(4), 566–591. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
  • Srivastava, S., & Misra, R. (2017). Exploring antecedents of entrepreneurial intentions of young women in India: A multi-method analysis. Journal of Entrepreneurship in Emerging Economies. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEEE-04-2016-0012
  • Steffensen, M., Rogers, E. M., & Speakman, K. (2000). Spin-offs from research centers at a research university. Journal of Business Venturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(98)00006-8
  • Tijssen, R. J. W. (2006). Universities and industrially relevant science: Towards measurement models and indicators of entrepreneurial orientation. Research Policy, 35(10), 1569–1585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.025
  • Tkachev, A., & Kolvereid, L. (1999). Self-employment intentions among russian students. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 11(3), 269–280. https://doi.org/10.1080/089856299283209
  • Tolentino, L. R., Sedoglavich, V., Lu, V. N., Garcia, P. R. J. M., & Restubog, S. L. D. (2014). The role of career adaptability in predicting entrepreneurial intentions: A moderated mediation model. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 85(3), 403–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2014.09.002
  • Trivedi, R. (2016). Does university play significant role in shaping entrepreneurial intention? A cross-country comparative analysis. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 23(3), 790–811. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-10-2015-0149
  • Trivedi, R. (2017). Entrepreneurial-intention constraint model: A comparative analysis among post-graduate management students in India, Singapore and Malaysia. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1239–1261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0449-4
  • Tubbs, M. E., & Ekeberg, S. E. (1991). The Role of Intentions in Work Motivation: Implications for Goal-Setting Theory and Research. Academy of Management Review, 16(1), 180–199. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1991.4279004
  • Turker, D., & Selcuk, S. S. (2009). Which factors affect entrepreneurial intention of university students? Journal of European Industrial Training, 33(2), 142–159. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090590910939049
  • Urbano, D., & Guerrero, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial Universities: Socioeconomic Impacts of Academic Entrepreneurship in a European Region. Gender and Society, 27(1), 40–55. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891242412471973
  • Varamäki, E., Tornikoski, E., Joensuu, S., Ristimäki, K., Blesa, A., & Ripolles, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial intentions among higher education students in Finland and Spain: Developing and piloting a survey instrument. International Journal of Information Systems in the Service Sector, 5(4), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijisss.2013100101
  • Villasana, M., Alcaraz-Rodríguez, R., & Alvarez, M. M. (2016). Examining entrepreneurial attributes of Latin American female university students. Gender and Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540253.2015.1093100
  • Westhead, P., & Solesvik, M. Z. (2016). Entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention: Do female students benefit? International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242615612534
  • Wilson, F., Kickul, J., Marlino, D., Barbosa, S. D., & Griffiths, M. D. (2009). An analysis of the role of gender and self-efficacy in developing female entrepreneurial interest and behavior. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946709001247
  • Wright, M., Lockett, A., Clarysse, B., & Binks, M. (2006). University spin-out companies and venture capital. Research Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2006.01.005
  • Yordanova, D. I., & Tarrazon, M. A. (2010). Gender differences in entrepreneurial intentions: Evidence from Bulgaria. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1084946710001543
  • Zaharia, S. E., & Gibert, E. (2005). The entrepreneurial university in the knowledge society. Higher Education in Europe. https://doi.org/10.1080/03797720500088038
  • Zeffane, R. (2015). Trust, personality, risk taking and entrepreneurship. World Journal of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development. https://doi.org/10.1108/wjemsd-08-2014-0025
  • Zhang, Y., Duysters, G., & Cloodt, M. (2014). The role of entrepreneurship education as a predictor of university students’ entrepreneurial intention. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10(3), 623–641. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z

Abstract Views: 42

PDF Views: 18




  • Effect of the University in the Entrepreneurial Intention of Female Students

Abstract Views: 42  |  PDF Views: 18

Authors

Carlos Bazan
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
Aparajita Datta
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
Hannah Gaultois
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
Arifusalam Shaikh
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
Katie Gillespie
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada
Jada Jones
Memorial University of Newfoundland, St. John’s, Canada

Abstract


Many researchers have studied gender differences in the entrepreneurial intention of students by analyzing the influence of several intrinsic and extrinsic factors on the antecedents of entrepreneurial intention. Fewer researchers have analyzed the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of the entrepreneurial intention of students in general and of female students in particular. This study aims to fill that gap by analyzing the influence of the university’s environment and support system on the precursors of entrepreneurial intention of female students at a university in Atlantic Canada. Findings of this study confirm that two precursors of entrepreneurial intention—i.e., attitude toward behavior and perceived behavioral control—mediate the effects of the university’s environment and support system on the entrepreneurial intention of female students. They also confirm that the university’s environment and support system comprises three distinct but interrelated dimensions, namely entrepreneurship training, start-up support, and entrepreneurial milieu. Results of this study also suggest that the university’s environment and support system has a positive relation with the perceived behavioral control of female students. However, findings of this study also suggest that the university’s environment and support system has a positive but negligible influence on the attitude toward the behavior of the same students. The outcomes of this study will help the university assess the efficacy of its innovation and entrepreneurship initiatives in promoting entrepreneurial activities. By understanding its entrepreneurial efficacy, the institution will be better equipped to raise the perceptions of venture feasibility and desirability, thus increasing students’ perceptions of opportunity.

Keywords


Entrepreneurial Intention, University Environment and Support System, Theory of Planned Behavior, Female Student Entrepreneurs, Regional Development.

References





DOI: https://doi.org/10.15759/ijek%2F2019%2Fv7i2%2F190249