Indian Journal of Economics and Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Significance of Rural-Urban Migration in India Post Liberalisation


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, Kharagpur College, India
 

Objective: Based on the Census reports this work analyses the significance of Rural-Urban migration in India since 2001. It attempts to show how rural-urban movement is the most important livelihood strategy among all the migration patterns.

Methods: This study uses the migration series data from Census of India to look into the scenario of internal labour mobility in India post liberalisation. Besides data form Census 1991, 2001 and 2011, few NSSO data have also been included in the study. Migrations categorised by distance, by direction and by sex have been studied together to find interrelationships among them. The study broadly categorises migration reasons as economic and non-economic.

Finding: The examined data reveals that since liberalisation, the population of the country has increased by 43.8% and the fraction of migrants has gone up by 10%. Over 37% of the country’s population are migrants but figures could be misleading because around half of all migrants move for marital reasons. Rural to rural movements are predominant and only just over 10% of the total migration are employment/business related movements.

Application: It is noticed that people choose to move short distances within the state. Volume of intra and inter district movements is high and most of it is of rural to rural nature. Women mostly migrate short distances largely to and from rural region which primarily are for marital reasons. However whenever people move across state borders most of it are urban bound. Inter-state migrations are also more motivated by economic reasons. Larger fractions of inter-state migrations are of rural-urban nature and directly associated to work/employment/business reasons. In fact rural-urban movements are prominent when migrations for only direct economic reasons are considered.


Keywords

Rural-Urban Migration, Post-Liberalisation, Urbanisation, Population, Economic Reasons, Marital Reasons.
User
Notifications

  • Census of India. 1991. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1991_Census_of_India. Date accessed: 18/02/2019.

  • Census of India. 2001. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001_Census_of_India. Date accessed: 19/02/2019.

  • Census of India. 2011. http://www.censusindia.gov.in. Date accessed: 04/06/2019.

  • S. Chandrasekhar. Workers commuting between Rural and Urban; Estimates from NSSO data”, Economic and Political Weekly. 2011; 46(46).

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Department_of_Economic_and_Social_Affairs. Date accessed: 01/05/2019.

  • deHaan, B. Rogaly. Eastward ho! Leapfrogging and seasonal migration in eastern India. In: G. Rodgers et al., eds., The Institutional Approach to Labour andDevelopment, London: Frank Cass, London. 1994; 14(1), 36-61.

  • Sharma, D. Sood. Migration and Informality”, Institute for Human Development, New Delhi, Retrieved from World Population Prospects: The 2017 Revision; United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. 2011; 1-22.

  • deHaan. Inclusive growth? Labour migration and poverty in India. International Institute of Social Studies, Erasmus, Working Paper No. 27. 2011.

  • Shah, A. Kumar. Migration and poverty in India: a multi-patterned and complex reality. Working Paper No. 45, Chronic Poverty and Research Centre, Indian Institute of Public Administration, New Delhi. 2011; 1-39.

  • Mitra, M. Murayama. Rural to Urban Migration: A District Level Analysis for India. Institute of Developing Studies, IDE Discussion Paper No. 137. 2008; 1-29.

  • Kesheri, Bhagat. Temporary and seasonal migration in India. Genus. 2010; 56(3), 25-45.

  • I.P.S. Ahluwalia. Migration, the informal sector and poverty: some Indian evidence”, Rotterdam: Erasmus University, Section International Economics. 2005.

  • R. Jha. Reducing poverty and inequality in India: Has liberalization helped? In: Cornia G. A. (2004), Inequality, growth and poverty in an era of liberalization and globalization, World institute for development economic research, Oxford: Oxford University press. 2004

  • Rogaly. Seasonal migration, social change and migrants’ rights: lessons from West Bengal. Economic and Political Weekly. 2001; 36(49).

  • Migration in India. Report No. 470 (55/10/8), 1999-2000, National Sample Survey Organisation, New Delhi, Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation Government of India. 2001; 1-329.

  • Migration in India 2007-08, NSS 64th Round (July 2007-June 2008), NSS Report No. 533 (64/10.2/2), New Delhi. 2010; 1-429.


Abstract Views: 204

PDF Views: 116




  • Significance of Rural-Urban Migration in India Post Liberalisation

Abstract Views: 204  |  PDF Views: 116

Authors

Pranim Chamling Rai
Department of Economics, Kharagpur College, India

Abstract


Objective: Based on the Census reports this work analyses the significance of Rural-Urban migration in India since 2001. It attempts to show how rural-urban movement is the most important livelihood strategy among all the migration patterns.

Methods: This study uses the migration series data from Census of India to look into the scenario of internal labour mobility in India post liberalisation. Besides data form Census 1991, 2001 and 2011, few NSSO data have also been included in the study. Migrations categorised by distance, by direction and by sex have been studied together to find interrelationships among them. The study broadly categorises migration reasons as economic and non-economic.

Finding: The examined data reveals that since liberalisation, the population of the country has increased by 43.8% and the fraction of migrants has gone up by 10%. Over 37% of the country’s population are migrants but figures could be misleading because around half of all migrants move for marital reasons. Rural to rural movements are predominant and only just over 10% of the total migration are employment/business related movements.

Application: It is noticed that people choose to move short distances within the state. Volume of intra and inter district movements is high and most of it is of rural to rural nature. Women mostly migrate short distances largely to and from rural region which primarily are for marital reasons. However whenever people move across state borders most of it are urban bound. Inter-state migrations are also more motivated by economic reasons. Larger fractions of inter-state migrations are of rural-urban nature and directly associated to work/employment/business reasons. In fact rural-urban movements are prominent when migrations for only direct economic reasons are considered.


Keywords


Rural-Urban Migration, Post-Liberalisation, Urbanisation, Population, Economic Reasons, Marital Reasons.

References