Indian Journal of Economics and Development

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

A Critical Evaluation On Forest Dependence And Forest Out Comes In West Bengal In The Context Of Joint Forest Management Programme- A Case Study Of Bankura District


Affiliations
1 Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan-731235, West Bengal, India
 

Objectives: The present study based on a field survey in Bankura district, West Bengal tries to find out that to what extent, the member households under the JFM program depend on the concerned forests for their subsistence and to what extent the program has benefited them in terms of forest outcomes.

Methods: The study mainly involves descriptive analysis based on a field survey in the district of Bankura, West Bengal across four Forest Protection Committees (FPCs) using multi-stage stratified sampling technique. The survey covers a total of 155 households. The data collected throughout the survey have been put into tabular form after doing some basic calculations.

Findings: The study finds that after the implementation of the program, the households, especially those from Female FPC village and those of the landless have been benefited a lot in accessing free bio-mass fuel from the concerned forest areas. Apart from head loading, the households earn a certain sum of money from usufructs share and forestry works. However, on average, a major portion of forest income for all the households (irrespective of village category or land holding status) comes from biomass fuel (along with few NTFPs). It seems that, JFM’s role in terms of tangible economic outcomes is not sufficient, as a major portion of the outcomes is limited in bio-mass fuel. It could hamper the very motive behind sustainable forest management in the coming years, since it is clearly evident that, forest protection is highly linked to people’s willingness and participation, which in turn depends on forest outcomes. In this regard the study suggests yielding of some quick growing NTFPs, like bamboos, cashew nuts along with honey and some medicinal plants that can give the people an additional option for generating extra income to some extent. Besides, increasing forestry working days can also give the people some extra money.

Applications/Improvements: JFM has provided the member households with little legitimate access to forest outcomes. However, since forest protection is highly linked to forest outcomes, the concerned forest departments should adopt some initiatives to make them financially availed.


Keywords

Joint Forest Management, Forest Protection Committee, Bio-mass Fuel, Head Loading, Female Forest Protection Committee.
User
Notifications

  • Das Nimai, Sarkar Debnarayana. Distributional aspect of forest income: a study on JFM and non-JFM forest dependent households. Working Paper No. 06. 2008.

  • Das Nimai, Sarkar Debnarayana. A study of economic outcome of joint forest management programme in west Bengal: the strategic decisions between government and forest fringe community. Indian Economic Review. 2008; 43(1), 17-45.

  • Pratap Dinesh. Community participation and forest policies in India: an overview. Social Change. 2010; 40(3), 235-256.

  • S. Rawat Tajbar, B.L. Menaria, D. Dugaya, P.C. Kotwal. Sustainable forest management in India. Current Science. 2008; 94(8), 1-7.

  • Report of the National Committee on Forest Rights Act. http://pib.nic.in/newsite/PrintRelease.aspx?relid=68853. Date accessed: 03/01/2011.

  • Banerjee Ajit. Participatory forest management in west Bengal: a review of policies and implementation. Understanding Livelihood Impacts of Participatory Forest Management Implementation in India and Nepal: Working Paper No: 3. 2004; 1-61.

  • Data base on environment and forestry statistics of West Bengal. Buero of applied economics and statistics-department of statistics and program implementation. Government of West Bengal. 2015.

  • A.K. Ghosh. Joint forest management. Status of Environment in West Bengal: A Citizen’s Report.2008; 1-10.

  • Singh Katar. People's Participation in managing common pool natural resources: lessons of success in India. Institute of Rural Management. 1991; 1-24.

  • West Bengal State Forest Report. http://www.indiaenvironmentportal.org.in/content/394360/west-bengal-state-forest-report-2011-2012/. Date accessed: 01/09/2013.

  • K. Arvind, Sarin Madhu, N.C. Saxena, Palit Subhabrata, Bathla Seema, Vania Farhad, M. Satyanarayan. Joint forest management: policy, practice and prospects. Policy That Works For Forests and People. 2000; 1-5.

  • Resolution on JFM committees in the districts of South West Bengal. Government of West Bengal Forest. 2008; 1-5.

  • Joshi Anuradha. Progressive bureaucracy: an oxymoron? The case of joint forest management in India. Rural Development Forestry Network. 1999.

  • Sundar Nandini. Unpacking the ‘Joint’ in joint forest management. Development and Change. 2000; 31(1), 255-279.

  • District Census Handbook: Bankura, West Bengal. Census of India. 2011.


Abstract Views: 340

PDF Views: 120




  • A Critical Evaluation On Forest Dependence And Forest Out Comes In West Bengal In The Context Of Joint Forest Management Programme- A Case Study Of Bankura District

Abstract Views: 340  |  PDF Views: 120

Authors

Ananya Mazumder
Visva-Bharati University, Santiniketan-731235, West Bengal, India

Abstract


Objectives: The present study based on a field survey in Bankura district, West Bengal tries to find out that to what extent, the member households under the JFM program depend on the concerned forests for their subsistence and to what extent the program has benefited them in terms of forest outcomes.

Methods: The study mainly involves descriptive analysis based on a field survey in the district of Bankura, West Bengal across four Forest Protection Committees (FPCs) using multi-stage stratified sampling technique. The survey covers a total of 155 households. The data collected throughout the survey have been put into tabular form after doing some basic calculations.

Findings: The study finds that after the implementation of the program, the households, especially those from Female FPC village and those of the landless have been benefited a lot in accessing free bio-mass fuel from the concerned forest areas. Apart from head loading, the households earn a certain sum of money from usufructs share and forestry works. However, on average, a major portion of forest income for all the households (irrespective of village category or land holding status) comes from biomass fuel (along with few NTFPs). It seems that, JFM’s role in terms of tangible economic outcomes is not sufficient, as a major portion of the outcomes is limited in bio-mass fuel. It could hamper the very motive behind sustainable forest management in the coming years, since it is clearly evident that, forest protection is highly linked to people’s willingness and participation, which in turn depends on forest outcomes. In this regard the study suggests yielding of some quick growing NTFPs, like bamboos, cashew nuts along with honey and some medicinal plants that can give the people an additional option for generating extra income to some extent. Besides, increasing forestry working days can also give the people some extra money.

Applications/Improvements: JFM has provided the member households with little legitimate access to forest outcomes. However, since forest protection is highly linked to forest outcomes, the concerned forest departments should adopt some initiatives to make them financially availed.


Keywords


Joint Forest Management, Forest Protection Committee, Bio-mass Fuel, Head Loading, Female Forest Protection Committee.

References