Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Migration and Public Policy in INDIA:Revisiting the HARRIS-TODARO Model


Affiliations
1 Department of Economics, Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad-500046, Telangana, India
 

Objective: The paper is to draw lessons from theoretical and empirical research and also critically examine the mainstream theoretical model of migration to propose an alternative framework that presents migrants into the city not as nuisance, but as important contributors to productivity and growth for the economy as a whole.

Methodology: It is a review article which focuses on the existing literature on migration in Classical Economics, Urban Economics, New Growth Theory and New Economic Geography.

Findings: The paper argues that when migration is associated with positive externalities in cities, a strong case exists for accommodating migrants in urban areas subject to appropriate policies for urban planning and development incentivized by the national government duly involving the city government. The findings state that when positive externalities of cities are considered, the conclusions from the theories of over-urbanization and over-migration as presented by models such as Harris-Todaro model will need to be drastically modified. Thus, there will be a need to have a positive view of migration calling for effort optimize the contribution of migrants to cities by taking measures to provide them affordable housing, workplaces, basic services, security of tenure, etc. This should be possible by harnessing the benefits of agglomeration and knowledge externalities in cities and using them as resource.

Application: The paper can open new research avenues on how an increasing number of migrants can be adapted into the cities by bringing the paradigm shifts in the planning process of the urban centers. The paper also provides the in depth analysis of the varying positions of learners and policy maker over the decades about rural urban migration which can help in systematic study of migrants and their conditions in the cities.


Keywords

Urbanization, Migration, Rural and Urban Development, Agglomeration Externalities.
User
Notifications

  • P. Mohanty. Cities and public policy. Sage. 2014.
  • World urbanization prospects. United Nation. 2014; 1-32.
  • Census of India. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Census_of_India. Date accessed: 01.11.2017.
  • S.V. Lall, H. Selod, Z. Shalizi. Rural-urban migration in developing countries: a survey of theoretical predictions and empirical findings. World Bank. 2006.
  • M. Todaro. Internal migration in the developing countries: a survey. Population and Economic Change in Developing Countries. 1980; 361-402.
  • K.M. Bahns. Rural to urban migration in developing countries- the applicability of the harris todaro model with special focus on chinese economy. 2005.
  • J. Williamson. Coping with city growth during the British industrial revolution. Cambridge University. 1990.
  • D.S. Massey. Worlds in motion: understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 1998; 1-376.
  • G. Beijer. International and national migratory movements. International Migration. 1980; 8, 93-109.
  • R.H. Adams. Remittances and poverty in ghana. World Bank Policy Research. 2006.
  • D. Mckenzie, H. Rapoport. Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: theory and Evidence from Mexico. World Bank. 2004.
  • Overcoming barriers: human mobility and development.. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/events/pdf/8/UNDP_OHDR_Klugmann.pdf. Date accessed: 16/11/2009.
  • X. Meng, D. Zhang, D. Social impact of rural urban migration on urban natives. 2013; 1-45.
  • J.K. Brueckner, H.A. Kim. Land market in the Harris Todaro model: a new factor equilibrium rural-urban migration. Journal of Regional Science. 2001; 41, 507-520.
  • O. Stark. Migration of labour. Oxford. 1991.
  • H.D. Hass. Migration and development: a thereotical perspective. International Migration Review. 2010; 44, 227-264.
  • J.N. Bhagwati, T.N. Srinivasan. On reanalysing the harris todaro model: policy ranking in case of sector specific sticky wages. The American Economic Review. 1974; 502-508.
  • K.C. Basu. Optimal policies in dual economies. The Quarterly Journal Of Economics. 1980; 187-196.
  • A.W. Khandker, S. Rashid. Wage subsidy and full-employment in a dual economy with open unemployment and surplus labor. Journal of Development Economics. 1995; 205-223.
  • C.C. Au, V. Henderson. How migration restrictions limit agglomerotion and productivity in China. Journal of Development Economics. 2004; 350-388.
  • P. Deshingkar, S. Grimm. Internal migration and development: a global perspective. IOM. 2005; 1-84.
  • C. Tumbe. Remittances in India: facts and issues. 2011; 1-38.
  • J.K. Brueckner, S.V. Lall. Cities in developing countries: fueled by rural urban migration, lacking in tenure security, and short of affordable housing. Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics. 2014; 5, 1-77.
  • Ahluwalia. HPEC report on Indian infrastructure and services. Government of India. 2011.

Abstract Views: 365

PDF Views: 284




  • Migration and Public Policy in INDIA:Revisiting the HARRIS-TODARO Model

Abstract Views: 365  |  PDF Views: 284

Authors

Namrata Singh Panwar
Department of Economics, Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad-500046, Telangana, India
Alok Mishra
Department of Economics, Hyderabad Central University, Hyderabad-500046, Telangana, India

Abstract


Objective: The paper is to draw lessons from theoretical and empirical research and also critically examine the mainstream theoretical model of migration to propose an alternative framework that presents migrants into the city not as nuisance, but as important contributors to productivity and growth for the economy as a whole.

Methodology: It is a review article which focuses on the existing literature on migration in Classical Economics, Urban Economics, New Growth Theory and New Economic Geography.

Findings: The paper argues that when migration is associated with positive externalities in cities, a strong case exists for accommodating migrants in urban areas subject to appropriate policies for urban planning and development incentivized by the national government duly involving the city government. The findings state that when positive externalities of cities are considered, the conclusions from the theories of over-urbanization and over-migration as presented by models such as Harris-Todaro model will need to be drastically modified. Thus, there will be a need to have a positive view of migration calling for effort optimize the contribution of migrants to cities by taking measures to provide them affordable housing, workplaces, basic services, security of tenure, etc. This should be possible by harnessing the benefits of agglomeration and knowledge externalities in cities and using them as resource.

Application: The paper can open new research avenues on how an increasing number of migrants can be adapted into the cities by bringing the paradigm shifts in the planning process of the urban centers. The paper also provides the in depth analysis of the varying positions of learners and policy maker over the decades about rural urban migration which can help in systematic study of migrants and their conditions in the cities.


Keywords


Urbanization, Migration, Rural and Urban Development, Agglomeration Externalities.

References