Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access

Power Sector Development in India:Performance of State Electricity Boards in the Pre-Reform Period


Affiliations
1 Department of Political Science, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102, India
 

Objectives: The objective of this paper is to examine the financial allocations in the plan periods for the power sector and performance of State Electricity Boards before the implementation of reform process in 2003.

Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper the financial outlays during the plan period particularly from first plan to ninth plan for the power sector development of India has be evaluated. In the process how the State Electricity Boards filled with institutional, administrative, infrastructural problems coupled with using the board to get political mileages were misused and organised, resulting in great financial losses. Ultimately under performances of the boards resulted in introduction of reform process in the sector. Historical and descriptive method was used to study the reasons behind various developments in the power sector in India.

Findings: Subsidies to the agricultural sector negatively affected the SEBs. The state governments over-stretched themselves to provide electricity at a sixth of the actual cost of generation, which means 16 paise per unit versus a production cost of 92 paise. Because of this high debt service and operation and maintenance expenses, the revenue flows could not cover not even a small share of investment costs adversely affecting investments in new capacity additions. Deficiencies arise because of the project delays, resulting in time loss and lost over runs, inadequate budgetary support, constraints regarding acquiring land environmental clearances and rehabilitation plans, constitute infinite drains on the SEBs. At the same time there was no comprehensive plan to address the vital matters. Besides these other problems were over employment, poor plant maintenance, lack of financial control and accountability resulted in low plant load factor and low productivity.

Application/Improvements: This study is relevant for policymakers concerned with the power sector in India and in States on how the sector can enter into problems unless using it as a professional body to address the power supply efficiently without political interference.


Keywords

Power Sector, Five Year Plans, State Electricity Boards, Pre-Reform Period, Subsidies.
User
Notifications

  • CEA (Central Electricity Authority). All India Electricity Statistics: General Review. Ministry of Power, Government of India: New Delhi, 2006, 16.
  • Planning Commission. Annual Report on the Working of State Electricity Boards and Electricity Departments, 2000-01. Government of India: New Delhi, 2002, 38.
  • The World Bank. World Development Report. The World Bank: Washington D.C., 1993, 45-67.
  • CEA (Central Electricity Authority). Public Electricity Supply-All India Statistics- General Review. Ministry of Power, Government of India: New Delhi, 1995-1996.
  • K.P. Kannan, Vijayamohanan Pillai. Plight of the Power Sector in India: Inefficiencies, Reform and Political Economy. Centre for Development Studies: Thiruvananthapuram, 2000, 305
  • Census of India. Annual Report. Government of India: New Delhi, 1992.
  • Planning Commission. Annual Report on the Working of State Electricity Boards and Electricity Departments, 2011-12. Government of India: New Delhi, 2011, 7-8.
  • Ministry of Finance. Economic Survery. Government of India: New Delhi, 2000-2001. http://indiabudget.nic.in/es2000-01/welcome.html.
  • M. Govinda Rao, K.P. Karajan, Ric Shand. The Economics of Electricity Supply in India. Macmillan India Limited: New Delhi, 1998.
  • Mahendra P. Lama, A. R. Kemal, Musleh-ud Din, Siddique, Rehana. Power Sector Reforms in India and Pakistan: Scope for Cross Border Trade in Power. Jawaharlal Nehru University: New Delhi, 2004, 2.
  • Mohsen Akbari, P. Khazaee, Sabetghadam, P. Karimifard. Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Power Transformers. Power Transmission & Distribution Research Center Niroo Research Institute (NRI): Tehran, 2013, 3.
  • Shrikant Akolkar. Industry Primer: Thermal Power Generation. http://www.dsij.in/article-details/articleid/4201/industry-primer-thermal-power-generation.aspx. Date accessed: 12/01/2016.
  • K.V. Pavithran. Economics of Power Generation, Transmission and Distribution. Serials Publications: New Delhi, 2005, 123.
  • Planning Commission. Power and Energy. http://planningcommission.nic.in/sectors/index.php?sectors=energy. Date accessed: 20/06/2014.
  • PriyabrataSantra, P.C. Pande , A.K. Singh, Pradeep Kumar. Solar PV pumping system for irrigation purpose and its economic comparison with grid- connected electricity and diesel operated pumps. Indian Journal of Economics and Development.2016; 4(4), 1-7.
  • Byrne John, Chandrashekar Govindarajan. Power Sector Reform: Key Elements of a Regulatory Framework. Economic and Political Weekly. August 1997, 2219.
  • Government of India. The Electricity (Supply) Act, 1948. New Delhi, 1996.
  • Surinder Kumar. Electricity Theft: Empowering People and Reforming Power Sector. Manohar Publishers: New Delhi, 2004, 21.
  • Ministry of Finance. Economic Survey. Government of India: New Delhi, 2006.
  • Planning Commission. Annual Reports on the Working of State Electricity Boards and Electricity Departments,1988- 2001. Government of India: New Delhi.
  • Mohsin S. Khan.Economic Development in South Asia.Tata McGraw-Hill Publishing Company Limited, New Delhi. 2002; 120.
  • Navroz K. Dubashi, Sudhir Chellarajan. Power Politics: Process of Power Sector Reforms in India. Economic and Political Weekly. September 2001, 3367.
  • M. Govinda Rao, K.P. Karajan, Ric Shand. The Economics of Electricity Supply in India. Macmillan India Limited: New Delhi, 1998, 43.
  • R.V. Shahi. Power Sector Reform Strategy. Power Line. 2002, 7(1), 6.
  • Department of Power. Report of the committee on power [the Rajadhyaksha Committee report]. Ministry of Energy, Government of India. Delhi: 1980.
  • Department of Power. Report of the Committee on Power. Ministry of Energy, Government of India: New Delhi, 1980, 9.
  • C. Taylor. India: Economic Issues in the Power Sector. The World Bank: Washington D.C., 1979, 27.
  • B. N. Banerjee. Economic Reforms and Vital Sectors of India. Gyan Publishing House: New Delhi, 1993, 135.
  • URF (Urja Research Foundation). IBPL Urja Year Book, 1991. Bombay, 1991, 18.

Abstract Views: 231

PDF Views: 133




  • Power Sector Development in India:Performance of State Electricity Boards in the Pre-Reform Period

Abstract Views: 231  |  PDF Views: 133

Authors

Omprasad Gadde
Department of Political Science, Sikkim University, Gangtok, Sikkim-737102, India

Abstract


Objectives: The objective of this paper is to examine the financial allocations in the plan periods for the power sector and performance of State Electricity Boards before the implementation of reform process in 2003.

Methods/Statistical analysis: In this paper the financial outlays during the plan period particularly from first plan to ninth plan for the power sector development of India has be evaluated. In the process how the State Electricity Boards filled with institutional, administrative, infrastructural problems coupled with using the board to get political mileages were misused and organised, resulting in great financial losses. Ultimately under performances of the boards resulted in introduction of reform process in the sector. Historical and descriptive method was used to study the reasons behind various developments in the power sector in India.

Findings: Subsidies to the agricultural sector negatively affected the SEBs. The state governments over-stretched themselves to provide electricity at a sixth of the actual cost of generation, which means 16 paise per unit versus a production cost of 92 paise. Because of this high debt service and operation and maintenance expenses, the revenue flows could not cover not even a small share of investment costs adversely affecting investments in new capacity additions. Deficiencies arise because of the project delays, resulting in time loss and lost over runs, inadequate budgetary support, constraints regarding acquiring land environmental clearances and rehabilitation plans, constitute infinite drains on the SEBs. At the same time there was no comprehensive plan to address the vital matters. Besides these other problems were over employment, poor plant maintenance, lack of financial control and accountability resulted in low plant load factor and low productivity.

Application/Improvements: This study is relevant for policymakers concerned with the power sector in India and in States on how the sector can enter into problems unless using it as a professional body to address the power supply efficiently without political interference.


Keywords


Power Sector, Five Year Plans, State Electricity Boards, Pre-Reform Period, Subsidies.

References