Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Relationship of Corporate Governance With Firm’s Performance and Dividend Payout:A Literature Review


Affiliations
1 Department of Commerce, School of Commerce and Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
2 School of Commerce and Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present study aims to find the research gap between corporate governance, firm performance, and dividend payout through available literature and develop future scope of the study. The study reviewed 100 research papers covering time from 1995 to 2016. The papers were classified and analyzed based on various approaches.

The review of literature indicates that research work on area of corporate governance has increased after 2007-08 crises. The study reveals that the relationship of different variables of corporate governance with dividend payout and firm performance are mixed in nature. It also indicates that different countries have different socio-economic, cultural, political, and legal dimensions that in turn affect the governance regulations of any country. Present study classifies, summarizes, and analyzes the past literature and provides a comprehensive review on corporate governance mechanism, which may be helpful for future research in same area.


Keywords

Corporate Governance, Dividend Payout, Firm Performance, Literature Review.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Abdelsalam, O., El-Masry, A., & Elsegini, S. (2008). Board composition, ownership structure and dividend policies in an emerging market: further evidence from CASE 50. Managerial Finance, 34(12), 953-964.
  • Abor, J., & Fiador, V. (2013). Does corporate governance explain dividend policy in Sub-Saharan Africa? International Journal of Law and Management, 55(3), 201-225.
  • Aggarwal, P. (2013). Impact of corporate governance on corporate financial performance. IOSR Journal of Business and Management (IOSR-JBM), 13(3), 01-05.
  • Alipour, M. (2013). An investigation of the association between ownership structure and corporate performance: Empirical evidence from Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE). Management Research Review, 36(11), 1137-1166.
  • Aljifri, K., & Moustafa, M. (2007). The impact of corporate governance mechanisms on the performance of UAE firms: An empirical analysis. Journal of Economic and Administrative Sciences, 23(2), 71-93.
  • Al-Najjar, B., & Belghitar, Y. (2014). Do corporate governance mechanisms affect cash dividends? An empirical investigation of UK firms. International Review of Applied Economics, 28(4), 524-538.
  • Al-Najjar, B., & Hussainey, K. (2011). Revisiting the capital-structure puzzle: UK evidence. The Journal of Risk Finance, 12(4), 329-338.
  • Al-Najjar, B., & Kilincarslan, E. (2016). The effect of ownership structure on dividend policy: Evidence from Turkey. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 16(1), 135-161.
  • Al-Saidi, M., & Al-Shammari, B. (2013). Board composition and bank performance in Kuwait: An empirical study. Managerial Auditing Journal, 28(6), 472-494.
  • Al-Saidi, M., & Al-Shammari, B. (2015). Ownership concentration, ownership composition and the performance of the Kuwaiti listed non-financial firms. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 25(1), 108-132.
  • Ashraf, B. N., & Zheng, C. (2015). Shareholder protection, creditor rights and bank dividend policies. China Finance Review International, 5(2), 161-186.
  • Batool, Z., & Javid, A. Y. (2014). Dividend Policy and Role of Corporate Governance in Manufacturing Sector of Pakistan. Working Paper [No. 109], Pakistan Institute of Development Economics. Islamabad, July.
  • Bebchuk, L. A., & Weisbach, M. S. (2010). The state of corporate governance research. Review of Financial Studies, 23(3), 939-961.
  • Benjamin, S. J., & Zain, M. M. (2015). Corporate governance and dividends payout: are they substitutes or complementary? Journal of Asia Business Studies, 9(2), 177-194.
  • Berthelot, S., Morris, T., & Morrill, C. (2010). Corporate governance rating and financial performance: A Canadian study. Corporate Governance: International Journal of Managerial Finance, 10(5), 635-646.
  • Bhagat, S., & Bolton, B. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 14(3), 257-273.
  • Bokpin, G. A. (2011). Ownership structure, corporate governance and dividend performance on the Ghana Stock Exchange. Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 12(1), 61-73.
  • Bokpin, G. A., Isshaq, Z., & Aboagye-Otchere, F. (2011). Ownership structure, corporate governance and corporate liquidity policy: Evidence from the Ghana Stock Exchange. Managerial Finance, 3(3), 262-279.
  • Bradford, W., Chen, C., & Zhu, S. (2013). Cash dividend policy, corporate pyramids, and ownership structure: Evidence from China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 27, 445-464.
  • Brick, I. E., Palmon, O., & Wald, J. K. (2006). CEO compensation, director compensation, and firm performance: Evidence of cronyism? Journal of Corporate Finance, 12(3), 403-423.
  • Byoun, S., Chang, K., & Kim, Y. S. (2016). Does corporate board diversity affect corporate payout policy?”, Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies, 45(1), 48–101. Available at SSRN 1786510.
  • Carter, D. A., Simkins, B. J., & Simpson, W. G. (2003). Corporate governance, board diversity, and firm value. Financial Review, 38(1), 33-53.
  • Chauhan, K. O. (2015). A study of corporate governance and dividend payout: evidence from Indian firms. ESEARCH HUB – International Multidisciplinary Research Journal, 2(2). Retrieved from www.rhimrj.com
  • Chen, S. K., Chen, X., Lin, B. X., & Zhong, R. (2005). The impact of government regulation and ownership on the performance of securities companies: Evidences from China. Global Finance Journal, 16(2), 113-124.
  • Chen, Z., Cheung, Y. L., Stouraitis, A., & Wong, A.W. (2005). Ownership concentration, firm performance, and dividend policy in Hong Kong. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 13(4), 431-449.
  • Chhillar, P., & Lellapalli, R. V. (2015). Divergence or convergence: Paradoxes in corporate governance? Corporate Governance, 15(5), 693-705.
  • Claessens, S., & Fan, J. P. (2002). Corporate governance in Asia: A survey. International Review of Finance, 3(2), 71-103.
  • Claessens, S., & Laeven, L. (2005). Financial dependence, banking sector competition, and economic growth. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(1), 179-207.
  • Core, J. E., Holthausen, R. W., & Larcker, D. F. (1999). Corporate governance, chief executive officer compensation, and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 51(3), 371-406.
  • Cunat, V., Gine, M., & Guadalupe, M. (2010). The vote is cast: The effect of corporate governance on shareholder value. The Journal of Finance, 67(5), 1943-1977.
  • Dedu, V., & Chitan, G. (2013). The influence of internal corporate governance on bank performance-an empirical analysis for Romania. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 99(6), 1114-1123.
  • Dustas, S. (2008). Of board characteristics, information technology maturity and transparency on company Performance, (Doctoral Dissertation, Yeditepe University).
  • Dalwai, T. A. R., Basiruddin, R., & Rasid, S. Z. A. (2015). A critical review of relationship between corporate governance and firm performance: GCC banking sector perspective. Corporate Governance, 15(1), 18-30.
  • Dwivedi, N., & Jain, A. K. (2005). Corporate governance and performance of Indian firms: The effect of board size and ownership. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 17(3), 161-172.
  • Ehikioya, B. I. (2009). sCorporate governance structure and firm performance in developing economies: evidence from Nigeria. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 9(3), 231-243.
  • Erkens, D. H., Hung, M., & Matos, P. (2012). Corporate governance in the 2007-2008 financial crises: Evidence from financial institutions worldwide. Journal of Corporate Finance, 18(2), 389-411.
  • Firth, M., Gao, J., Shen, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Institutional stock ownership and firms’ cash dividend policies: Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 65, 91-107.
  • Gugler, K. (2003). Corporate governance, dividend payout policy, and the interrelation between dividends, R&D and capital investment. Journal of Banking & Finance, 27(7), 1297-1321.
  • Guo, Z., & Kga, U. K. (2012). Corporate governance and firm performance of listed firms in Sri Lanka. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 40, 664-667.
  • Gupta, P., & Sharma, A. M. (2014). A study of the impact of corporate governance practices on firm performance in Indian and South Korean companies. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 133, 4-11.
  • Haldar, A., & Rao, S. N. (2014). Corporate Governance in India. Corporate Ownership & Control, 12(1), 287-297.
  • Isshaq, Z., Bokpin, G. A., & Onumah, J. M. (2009). Corporate governance, ownership structure, cash holdings, and firm value on the Ghana Stock Exchange. The Journal of Risk Finance, 10(5), 488-499.
  • Javed, A. Y., & Iqbal, R. (2007). Relationship between corporate governance indicators and firm value: A case study of Karachi stock exchange. Working Paper [No. 2007:14], Pakistan Institute of Development Economics, Islamabad.
  • Joshi, A. B. (2010). A Study on Corporate Governance and the Financial Performance of Selected Indian Companies, (Doctoral dissertation, Saurashtra University).
  • Ji, X., Ahmed, K., & Lu, W. (2015). The impact of corporate governance and ownership structure reforms on earnings quality in China. International Journal of Accounting & Information Management, 23(2), 169-198.
  • Kim, D. H., Kim, J., Byun, Y., & Chun, S. H. (2013). A study on the effect of governance adequacy on the corporate performance. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 107, 59-66.
  • Klapper, L. F., & Love, I. (2004). Corporate governance, investor protection, and performance in emerging markets. Journal of Corporate Finance, 10(5), 703-728.
  • Kowalewski, O., Stetsyuk, I., & Talavera, O. (2007). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Poland. Working Paper [No. 07-09], German Institute for Economic Research, Wharton Financial Institutions Center, Berlin.
  • Kyereboah-Coleman, A., & Biekpe, N. (2006). The link between corporate governance and performance of the non-traditional export sector: Evidence from Ghana. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 6(5), 609-623.
  • Levine, R. (2004). The corporate governance of banks: A concise discussion of concepts and evidence. Working Paper [No. 3404], World Bank Publications.
  • Leung, N. W., & Cheng, M. A. (2013). Corporate governance and firm value: Evidence from Chinese state-controlled listed firm. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 89-112.
  • Liu, C., Uchida, K., & Yang, Y. (2012). Corporate governance and firm value during the global financial crisis: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 70-80.
  • Mancinelli, L., & Ozkan, A. (2006). Ownership structure and dividend policy: Evidence from Italian firms. European Journal of Finance, 12(3), 265-282.
  • Manawaduge, A.S.P.G. (2012). Corporate Governance Practices their impacts on corporate. Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/theses/3676/
  • McGee, R. W. (2009). Corporate governance in developing economies, Springer.
  • Mehar, A. (2005). Corporate governance and dividend policy. Pakistan Economic and Social Review, 43(1) 93-106.
  • Mehran, H. (1995). Executive compensation structure, ownership, and firm performance. Journal of financial economics, 38(2), 163-184.
  • Mitton, T. (2004). Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets. Emerging Markets Review, 5(4), 409-426.
  • Mollah, S., Farooque, O. A., & Karim, W. (2012). Ownership structure, corporate governance and firm performance: Evidence from an African emerging market. Studies in Economics and Finance, 29(4), 301-319.
  • Niu, F. F. (2006). Corporate governance and the quality of accounting earnings: A Canadian perspective. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 2(4), 302-327.
  • Nguyen, T., Locke, S., & Reddy, K. (2015). Ownership concentration and corporate performance from a dynamic perspective: Does national governance quality matter?. International Review of Financial Analysis, 41, 148-161.
  • Omran, M. M., Bolbol, A., & Fatheldin, A. (2008). Corporate governance and firm performance in Arab equity markets: Does ownership concentration matter?. International Review of Law and Economics, 28(1), 32-45.
  • Panchasara, B. M. (2012). An Empirical Study on Corporate Governance in Indian Banking Sector, (Doctoral dissertation, Saurashtra University).
  • Phung, D. N., & Mishra, A. V. (2016). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Vietnamese listed firms. Australian Economic Papers, 55(1), 63-98.
  • Prommin, P., Jumreornvong, S., & Jiraporn, P. (2014). The effect of corporate governance on stock liquidity: The case of Thailand. International Review of Economics & Finance, 32, 132-142.
  • Rosenberg, M. (2003). Corporate governance mechanisms and firm performance: Evidence from Finland. Working Paper, Swedish School of Economics and Business Administration, Helsinki.
  • Sawicki, J. (2009). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Southeast Asia pre-and post-crisis. The European Journal of Finance, 15(2), 211-230.
  • Setia-Atmaja, L. (2010). Dividend and debt policies of family controlled firms: The impact of board independence. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 6(2), 128-142.
  • Shah, A. Z., & Wasim, U. (2011). Impact of ownership structure on dividend policy of firm”, International Conference on E-Business, Management & Economics 2011 Proceeding of the IEDRC, IPEDR Press, Hong Kong.
  • Srinivasan, P., & Srinivasan, V. (2011). Status of Corporate Governance Research on India: An Exploratory Study. Working Paper [No. 334], IIM Bangalore Research Paper, Bangalore.
  • Subramaniam, R., & Devi, S. S. (2011). Corporate governance and dividend policy in Malaysia. In International Conference on Business and Economics Research 2010 Proceeding of the ICBER 2010 International Conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, November 2010, IACSIT Press, Kuala Lumpur.
  • Von-Lilienfeld-Toal, U., & Ruenzi, S. (2010). CEO ownership, stock market performance, and managerial discretion, Working Paper. Retrieved from http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.Cfm
  • Yarram, S. R., & Dollery, B. (2015). Corporate governance and financial policies: Influence of board characteristics on the dividend policy of Australian firms. Managerial Finance, 41(3), 267-285.
  • Yu, M. (2013). State ownership and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Chinese listed companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 6(2), 75-87.
  • Zagorchev, A., & Gao, L. (2015). Corporate governance and performance of financial institution. Journal of Economics and Business, 82, 17-41.
  • Zeitun, R., & Tian, G. G. (2007). Does ownership affect a firm’s performance and default risk in Jordan?. Corporate Governance: The International Journal of Business in Society, 7(1), 66-82.
  • Zhang, H. (2008). Corporate governance and dividend policy: A comparison of Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong and in the Mainland. China Economic Review, 19(3), 437-459.

Abstract Views: 201

PDF Views: 1




  • Relationship of Corporate Governance With Firm’s Performance and Dividend Payout:A Literature Review

Abstract Views: 201  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Sushila Soriya
Department of Commerce, School of Commerce and Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India
Narender Kumar
School of Commerce and Management, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, Rajasthan, India

Abstract


The present study aims to find the research gap between corporate governance, firm performance, and dividend payout through available literature and develop future scope of the study. The study reviewed 100 research papers covering time from 1995 to 2016. The papers were classified and analyzed based on various approaches.

The review of literature indicates that research work on area of corporate governance has increased after 2007-08 crises. The study reveals that the relationship of different variables of corporate governance with dividend payout and firm performance are mixed in nature. It also indicates that different countries have different socio-economic, cultural, political, and legal dimensions that in turn affect the governance regulations of any country. Present study classifies, summarizes, and analyzes the past literature and provides a comprehensive review on corporate governance mechanism, which may be helpful for future research in same area.


Keywords


Corporate Governance, Dividend Payout, Firm Performance, Literature Review.

References