Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Disclosure of Corporate Voluntary Board Governance Practices in India


Affiliations
1 Khalsa College, Amritsar, Punjab, India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


The present paper deals with the current as well as hotly debated issue of increasing attention on the extent of governance practices followed by the corporates. In particular, it investigates the disclosure of sound board practices followed by the top listed companies in India by relying upon a Voluntary Board Governance Disclosure Index (VBGDI) developed in the study. The index has been constructed by following the requirements stated under Revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement (2004) and Corporate Governance Voluntary Guidelines (2009). In addition, the study has covered two time points in its dataset in order to examine an improvement in the disclosure of board governance practices by the corporates from the time point 1 (2005-06) to the time point 2 (2009-10). The testing has been performed by means of paired samples t-test and Wilcoxen signed rank test (for robustness testing) which has reported significant improvement for some selected board practices in particular and for overall disclosure score as a whole. Overall, the analysis suggests that the corporate voluntary disclosure of the board governance practices has been improved (but only for some items), however, there are certain influential practices which should be covered by the companies in the ambit of their governance frameworks so that the level of governance standards in India can be upraised. On the whole, it suggests the companies to incorporate more board governance practices in the spectrum of their governance disclosures.

Keywords

Corporate Governance, Board Practices, Voluntary Guidelines, Disclosure Index, Time Points.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akhtaruddin, M., Hossain, M. A., Hossain, M., & Yao, L. (2009). Corporate governance and voluntary disclosure in corporate annual reports of Malaysian listed firms. JAMAR, 7(1), 1-20.
  • Al-Haddad, W., Alzurqan, S. T., & Al-Sufy, F. J. (2011). The effect of corporate governance on the performance of Jordanian industrial companies: An empirical study on Amman Stock Exchange. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1(4), 55-69.
  • Bai, C., Liu, Q., Lu, J., Song, F. M., & Zhang, J. (2004). Corporate governance and market valuation in China. Journal of Comparative Economics, 32(4), 599-616.
  • Batth, V., Nayak, B., & Sarangi, P. (2016). Role of independent directors in the changing business scenario in India. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 4(2), 3878-3882.
  • Bhana, N. (2010). The stock market reaction to criticism of corporate governance practices of companies listed on the JSE. Investment Analysts Journal, 39(72), 1-12.
  • Bhardwaj, N., & Rao, B. R. (2014). Corporate governance practices in India - A case study. Asia Pacific Journal of Research, 1(13), 43-54.
  • Bhuiyan, H. U., & Biswas, P. K. (2007). Corporate governance and reporting: An empirical study of the listed companies in Bangladesh. Journal of Business Studies, 28(1), 1-32.
  • Black, B. S., Jang, H., & Kim, W. (2006). Does corporate governance predict firms’ market values? Evidence from Korea. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 22(2), 366-413.
  • Brown, L. D., & Caylor, M. L. (2004). Corporate governance and firm performance. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=586423
  • Brown, W. A. (2007). Board development practices and competent board members: Implications for performance. Nonprofit Management & Leadership, 17(3), 301-317.
  • Chang, Y. W., Chang, R. D., & Wei, J. T. (2008). The effects of corporate governance mechanisms on investment decisions. Taiwan Academy of Management Journal, 8(2), 1-16.
  • Corporate Governance in Listed Companies - Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement (2004). (2004, October 29). Retrieved from http://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/oct-2004/corporate-governance-in-listed-companies-clause-49-of-the-listing-agreement_13153.html
  • Corporate Governance in Listed Entities - Amendments to Clauses 35B and 49 of the Equity Listing Agreement (2014). (2014, April 17). Retrieved from http://www.sebi.gov.in/legal/circulars/apr-2014/corporate-governance-in-listed-entities-amendments-to-clauses-35b-and-49-of-the-equity-listing-agreement_26 674.html
  • Corporate Governance Voluntary Guidelines (2009). (2009, December 14-21). Retrieved from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/latestnews/CG_Voluntary_Guidelines_2009_24dec2009.pdf
  • Drobetz, W., Schillhofer, A., & Zimmermann, H. (2004). Corporate governance and expected stock returns: Evidence from Germany. European Financial Management, 10(2), 267-293.
  • Dube, I., & Pakhira, A. (2013). Role of independent director in corporate governance - Reference to India. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 9(1), 50-83.
  • Fung, B. (2014). The demand and need for transparency and disclosure in corporate governance. Universal Journal of Management, 2(2), 72-80.
  • Gupta, A., Hothi, B. S., & Gupta, S. L. (2011). Corporate: Independent directors in the board. Global Journal of Management and Business Research, 11(1), 51-59.
  • Huang, R., & Tompkins, J. G. (2010). Corporate governance and investor reactions to seasoned equity offerings. Managerial Finance, 36(7), 603-628.
  • Kandukuri, R. L., Memdani, L., & Babu, P. R. (2015). Effect of corporate governance on firm performance- A study of selected Indian listed companies. In John W. Kensinger (ed.) Overlaps of private sector with public sector around the globe (pp. 47-64). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
  • Katragadda, R. (2013). Corporate governance and firm performance: A theoretical review. International Journal of Advance Research in Computer Science and Management Studies, 1(7), 368-371.
  • Kaur, J., Upadyay, G., & Pareek, A. (2014). Corporate governance: An Indian perspective on disclosure and transparency issues. Journal of Contemporary Research in Management, 9(2), 35-43.
  • Khatab, H., Masood, M., Zaman, K., Saleem, S., & Saeed, B. (2011). Corporate governance and firm performance: A case study of Karachi stock market. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 2(1), 39-43.
  • Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2005). Evaluating boards and directors. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 13(5), 613-631.
  • Kotra, R. (2015). Role of independent directors in corporate governance. Indian Journal of Applied Research, 5(11). Retrieved from https://www.worldwidejournals.com/indian-journal-of-applied-research-(IJAR)/articles.php?val=NzkyMg==&b1=277&k=70
  • Mangala, D., & Isha (2015). Disclosure through annual reports: A study of Indian corporate sector. International Journal of Research in Management, Science & Technology, 3(2), 148-155.
  • Sachdeva, S. K., Batra, G. S., & Walia, N. (2015). Corporate disclosure practices in selected Indian companies. IPASJ International Journal of Management (IIJM), 3(10), 31-38.
  • Sen, A. (2011). Corporate governance in India: Clause 49 of the listing agreement. JM International Journal of Management Research, 1(2), 162-171.
  • Sharma, R., & Singh, F. (2009). Voluntary corporate governance disclosure: A study of selected companies in India. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, 8(3&4), 91-108.
  • Subramanyam, M., & Dasaraju, H. (2014). Corporate governance and disclosure practices in listed information technology (IT) companies in India. Open Journal of Accounting, 3, 89-106.
  • The Companies Act (2013). (2013, August 29). Retrieved from http://www.mca.gov.in/Ministry/pdf/CompaniesAct2013.pdf

Abstract Views: 197

PDF Views: 1




  • Disclosure of Corporate Voluntary Board Governance Practices in India

Abstract Views: 197  |  PDF Views: 1

Authors

Shivan Sarpal
Khalsa College, Amritsar, Punjab, India

Abstract


The present paper deals with the current as well as hotly debated issue of increasing attention on the extent of governance practices followed by the corporates. In particular, it investigates the disclosure of sound board practices followed by the top listed companies in India by relying upon a Voluntary Board Governance Disclosure Index (VBGDI) developed in the study. The index has been constructed by following the requirements stated under Revised Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement (2004) and Corporate Governance Voluntary Guidelines (2009). In addition, the study has covered two time points in its dataset in order to examine an improvement in the disclosure of board governance practices by the corporates from the time point 1 (2005-06) to the time point 2 (2009-10). The testing has been performed by means of paired samples t-test and Wilcoxen signed rank test (for robustness testing) which has reported significant improvement for some selected board practices in particular and for overall disclosure score as a whole. Overall, the analysis suggests that the corporate voluntary disclosure of the board governance practices has been improved (but only for some items), however, there are certain influential practices which should be covered by the companies in the ambit of their governance frameworks so that the level of governance standards in India can be upraised. On the whole, it suggests the companies to incorporate more board governance practices in the spectrum of their governance disclosures.

Keywords


Corporate Governance, Board Practices, Voluntary Guidelines, Disclosure Index, Time Points.

References