A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z All
Preethi, R. M.
- RFA:Reanalyze Requests for ADMINSHIP over the Wikipedia
Authors
1 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Sanketika Institute of Technology and Management, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, IN
2 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Avanthi Institute of Engineering & Technology, KOTABHOGAPURAM, Andhra Pradesh 535006, IN
3 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Andhra University College of Engineering (A), Visakhapatnam, IN
4 Department of Computer Science and Engineering, AVANTHI Institute of Engineering & Technology, NARSIPATNAM, Andhra Pradesh, IN
Source
Indian Journal of Automation and Artificial Intelligence, Vol 4, No 1 (2017), Pagination: 1-8Abstract
Objectives: Requests for ADMINSHIP (RFA) within Wikipedia are primarily focused on the impact of the relationship between ADMINSHIP candidates and voters on RFA success. Very few studies, however, have investigated how candidates’ contributions may predict their success in the RFA process.
Methods/Statistical Analysis: In this examination, we look at the effect of substance and social commitments and in addition add up to commitments made by ADMINSHIP hopefuls on the group's general choice in the matter of whether to elevate the possibility to head.
Findings: We also assess the influence of clarity of contribution on RFA success. To do so, we collected data on 754 RFA cases and used logistic regression to test four hypotheses.
Application/Improvements: Our results highlight the important role that user contribution behaviors and activity history have on the user’s success in the RFA process. The outcomes additionally propose that residency and number of RFA endeavors assume a part in the RFA procedure. Our discoveries have suggestions for hypothesis and practice.
Keywords
Requests for ADMINSHIP (RFA), Content Contribution, Administrators, Trust, Wikipedia, Social Contribution.Full Text
References
- A. Aaltonen, G.F. Lanzara. Building Governance capability in online social production: insights from Wikipedia. Organization Studies. 2015; 36(12), 1649-1673.
- Administrators/Tools.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators/Tools. Date accessed: 27/10/2017.
- Y. Algan, Y. Benkler, M.F. Morell, J. Hergueux. Cooperation in peer production economy experimental evidence from Wikipedia. Paper presented at the Workshop on Information Systems and Economics. 2013; 1-31.
- The Nature of the Firm. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Nature_of_the_Firm. Date accessed: 03/04/2017.
- M. Burke, R. Kraut. Mopping up: modeling Wikipedia promotion decisions. Proceedings of the 2008 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. 2008; 1-10.
- M. Burke, R. Kraut. Taking up the mop: identifying future Wikipedia administrators. Proceedings of the CHI'08 extended abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 2008; 3441-3446.
- G. Cabunducan, R. Castillo, J.B. Lee. Voting behavior analysis in the election of Wikipedia admins. Proceedings of the 2011 International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). 2011; 545-547.
- B. Collier, M. Burk, N. Kittur, R. Kraut. Retrospective versus prospective evidence for promotion: The case of Wikipedia. Proceedings of the 2008 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. 2008; 1-29.
- K. Derthick, P. Tsao, T. Kriplean, A. Borning, M. Zachry, D.W, McDonald. Collaborative sensemaking during admin permission granting in Wikipedia, in Ant OZOK and Panayiotis ZAPHIRIS (Eds.) Online Communities and Social Computing. 2011; 100-109.
- N. Desai, R. Liu, C. Mullings. Result prediction of Wikipedia administrator elections based on network features. 2014; 1-5.