The Asian Journal of Horticulture

Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Subscription Access
Open Access Open Access Open Access  Restricted Access Restricted Access Subscription Access

Effect of Different Planting Geometry on Yield and Quality of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.)


Affiliations
1 Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Pipalia, Dhoraji (Gujarat), India
2 Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh (Gujarat), India
     

   Subscribe/Renew Journal


A field experiment was conducted at Hi-tech Horticulture Park, Department of Horticulture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during Late Kharif season in the year 2010 with mulch to study the effect of planting geometry on yield and quality of watermelon. It consists of twelve treatment combinations, comprising of three levels of planting geometry viz., diagonally paired row with 80 cm spacing (G1), parallel paired row with 80 cm spacing (G2) and parallel paired row with 40 cm spacing (G3) were embedded in a Split Plot Design in CRD with four replications. The experiment resulted that with maximum yield and quality attributing characters under study were significantly affected by planting geometry treatments. Highest fruit length (21.25 cm), fruit girth (13.81 cm), yield tons per hectare (44.33 t/ha), pulp weight (1712.57 g), lowest rag weight (610.90 g), total soluble solids (10.98 °B), non-reducing sugars (3.91 %), reducing sugars (1.72 %), total sugars (5.25 %) and ascorbic acid content (7.90 mg/100 g pulp) were recorded under G1 (Diagonally paired row with 80 cm spacing). While, superior fruit yield in terms of kg per plot (38.38 kg) was found in G3 (Parallel paired row with 40 cm spacing).

Keywords

Watermelon, Planting Geometry, Yield, Quality, Spacing, Mulch.
Subscription Login to verify subscription
User
Notifications
Font Size


  • Akintoyea, H.A., Kintomo, A. A. and Adekunleb, A. A. (2009). Yield and fruit quality of watermelon in response to plant population. Internat. J. Veg. Sci., 15(4): 369–380.

  • Ban, D., Goreta, S. and Borosic, J. (2006). Plant spacing and cultivar affect melon growth and yield components. Sci. Hort., 109(3): 238-243.

  • Bhatia, A.K., Arora, S.K., Malik, T.P., Singh, Vijaypal and Yadav, S.P.S. (2007). Growth and yield of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) hybrids/varities in response greenhouse conditions. Haryana J. Hort. Sci., 36(1&2): 150-152.

  • Brinen, G.H., Locascio, S.J. and Elmstrom, G.W. (1979). Plant and row spacing, mulch, and fertilizer rate effects on watermelon production. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci., 104: 724-726.

  • Devi, M.J. and Gopalakrishnan, T.R. (2004). Spacing influences growth and productivity of less spreading and short duration oriental pickling melon (Cucumis melo var. conomon Mak.), cv. ‘SAUBHAGYA’. J. Trop. Agric., 42 (1/2): 59-61.

  • Gualberto, R., Resende, F.V. and Losasso, P.H.L. (2001). Greenhouse net melon fruits yield and yield quality in response to spacing and cultivation system. Horticultura Brasileira, 19(3) : 373-376.

  • Kultur, F., Harrison, H.C. and Staub, J.E. (2001). Spacing and genotype affect on fruit sugar concentration, yield, and fruit size of muskmelon. Hort. Sci., 36(2) : 274-278.

  • Lima-e-Silva, P.S., Fonseca, J.R. da, Mota, J.C.A. and Silva, J. da. (2003). Plant density and fruit yield of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.). Revista Brasilieira de Fruticulutra, 25(2): 245-247.

  • Motsenbocker, C.E. and Arancibia, R.A. (2002). In-row spacing influences triploid watermelon yield and crop value. Hort. Technol., 12(3): 437-440.

  • Nerson, H. (1999). Effects of population density on fruit and seed production in muskmelons.Acta Hort., (492): 65-70.

  • Panse, V.G. and Sukhatme, P.V. (1967). Statistical methods for agricultural workers. I.C.A.R. Pub., New Delhi, 369 pp.

  • Qudeimat, E.A., Abu-Rayyan, A.M. and Abu Awwad, A.M. (2004). The effects of plant spacing and irrigation levels on muskmelon fruit yield and quality. Dirasat Agric. Sci., 31(2) : 229-238.

  • Ranganna, S. (1979). Manual of analysis of fruits and vegetables. Tata MC Graw Hill Pub. Co. Ltd., New Delhi.

  • Resende, G.M. and de Costa, N.D. (2003). Yield and fruit quality of melon in different planting densities. Horticultura Brasileira, 21(4): 690-694.

  • Sanders D.C., Cure, J.D. and Schultheis, J.R. (1999). Yield response of watermelon to planting density, planting pattern, and polythene mulch. Hort. Sci., 34(7): 1221-1223.

  • Singh, Daljit, Chopra, Sandeep and Sandhu, K.S. (2001). Effect of population density on the growth and yield attributes of muskmelon (Cucumis melo L.) “hybrid MH-10”. J. Res., Punjab Agric. Univ., 38 (3/4) : 202-206.

  • Smiljana, Goreta, SlavkoPerica, GvozdenDumicic, Lovre, Bucan and Katja, Zanic (2005). Growth and yield of watermelon on polyethylene mulch with different spacings and nitrogen rates.Hort. Sci., 40(2): 366-369.

  • Soltani, N., Anderson, J.L. and Hamson, A.R. (1995). Growth analysis of watermelon plants grown with mulches and row covers. J. Amer. Hort. Soc., 20 : 1001-1009.


Abstract Views: 255

PDF Views: 0




  • Effect of Different Planting Geometry on Yield and Quality of Watermelon (Citrullus lanatus Thunb.)

Abstract Views: 255  |  PDF Views: 0

Authors

F. P. Kargatiya
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Pipalia, Dhoraji (Gujarat), India
V. R. Malam
Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh (Gujarat), India
V. S. Prajapati
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Pipalia, Dhoraji (Gujarat), India
P. S. Sharma
Krishi Vigyan Kendra (J.A.U.), Pipalia, Dhoraji (Gujarat), India

Abstract


A field experiment was conducted at Hi-tech Horticulture Park, Department of Horticulture, Junagadh Agricultural University, Junagadh during Late Kharif season in the year 2010 with mulch to study the effect of planting geometry on yield and quality of watermelon. It consists of twelve treatment combinations, comprising of three levels of planting geometry viz., diagonally paired row with 80 cm spacing (G1), parallel paired row with 80 cm spacing (G2) and parallel paired row with 40 cm spacing (G3) were embedded in a Split Plot Design in CRD with four replications. The experiment resulted that with maximum yield and quality attributing characters under study were significantly affected by planting geometry treatments. Highest fruit length (21.25 cm), fruit girth (13.81 cm), yield tons per hectare (44.33 t/ha), pulp weight (1712.57 g), lowest rag weight (610.90 g), total soluble solids (10.98 °B), non-reducing sugars (3.91 %), reducing sugars (1.72 %), total sugars (5.25 %) and ascorbic acid content (7.90 mg/100 g pulp) were recorded under G1 (Diagonally paired row with 80 cm spacing). While, superior fruit yield in terms of kg per plot (38.38 kg) was found in G3 (Parallel paired row with 40 cm spacing).

Keywords


Watermelon, Planting Geometry, Yield, Quality, Spacing, Mulch.

References